landslide management using geospatial technology (lmgt)

More documents

Recommendations

Info

(Cont’d)Definitions of "acceptance criteria" for landslidesNo. Risk QualifierDefinition1 Acceptable Level society desires to achieve2 TolerableLevel society accepts to live with tosecure certain benefits3 Individual Imposed on an individual4 Societal Imposed to society as a whole5 VoluntaryRisk voluntarily faced to gainbenefits6 Involuntary Risk imposed by a body7 Specific Risk for a specific element8 Total Sum of specific risks
CONCLUSIONS1. In terms of landslide hazards, the resulted LHM of Kota Kinabalu areasuggests that 10% of the area can be categorised as Very Low Hazard, 16%as Low Hazard, 14% as Moderate Hazard, 48% as High Hazard and 12% asVery High Hazard. Whereas, in terms of landslide risks, the LRM indicatesthat 14% of the area is in Very Low Risk zone, 10% in Low Risk zone, 52%in Medium Risk zone, 22% in High Risk zone and 2% in Very High Riskzone. Areas with low degree of landslides hazard does not mean have thelow risk to experience landslides, and vice-versa.2. The benefit of a LMGT is to provide insight and options for decision-makingin practical problems. The benefits includes: It encourages a rational, systematic approach for assessing the safety of slopes, and aframework to put uncertainties and engineering judgment into a system and allowscomparison of hazards and risks for different slopes. It focuses attention or what happens if the slope fails and liabilities and responsibilities ofthe parties involved and provides an open and transparent process on the nature and keycontributors of risk and uncertainty for discussion with the regulators, owners, stakeholders,etc. (Fell et al., 2005). It increases awareness of the need to consider uncertainties, and insight on what can gowrong and their potential consequences.
Page 1 and 2: LANDSLIDE MANAGEMENT USING GEOSPATI
Page 3 and 4: INTRODUCTION Landslide - Geohazards
Page 5 and 6: DEVELOPMENT ISSUES AND LANDSLIDE IN
Page 7 and 8: (Cont’d)Reality….?
Page 9 and 10: (Cont’d)IN SABAH….. ?
Page 11 and 12: (Cont’d)Karambunai ResortKg. Lok
Page 13 and 14: Landslide records in MalaysiaBil Ta
Page 15: LANDSLIDE MORPHOLOGYVarnes (1978)
Page 18 and 19: LANDSLIDE CAUSING FACTORSNatural Fa
Page 20 and 21: (Cont’d)Non-Natural Factors: Inco
Page 22 and 23: MATERIALS AND METHODS
Page 24 and 25: (Cont’d)LRM Cycles (Taubenb¨ock
Page 26 and 27: (Cont’d)
Page 28 and 29: Rating value for landslide hazard a
Page 30 and 31: (Cont’d)No6Landslide HazardIdenti
Page 32 and 33: RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS
Page 34 and 35: (Cont’d)Geological mapLandslide d
Page 36 and 37: (Cont’d)Analysis results of rock
Page 38 and 39: (Cont’d)Analysis results of soil
Page 40 and 41: (Cont’d)Population Map (PM) Kota
Page 42 and 43: (Cont’d)Family of F-N curves by P
Page 46 and 47: (Cont’d)3. Due to its generalized

landslide management using geospatial technology (lmgt)

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?