landslide management using geospatial technology (lmgt)
landslide management using geospatial technology (lmgt) landslide management using geospatial technology (lmgt)
(Cont’d)Geological mapLandslide distributions map‣ 0 o – 20 o ” (49 %)‣ 21 o – 40 o (5 % )‣ 41 o – 60 o (33%)‣ 61 o – 80 o (12%)‣> 80 o (1%)Digital elevation model (DEM)Slope gradient map
(Cont’d)Hydrology mapGeohydrology map‣ Residential sector(15%)‣ Commercial sector(10%)‣ Industrial sector(8%)‣ Higher educationinstitutions & schoolssector (7%)‣ Public infrastructuresector (5%)Land use mapSoil types map
- Page 1 and 2: LANDSLIDE MANAGEMENT USING GEOSPATI
- Page 3 and 4: INTRODUCTION Landslide - Geohazards
- Page 5 and 6: DEVELOPMENT ISSUES AND LANDSLIDE IN
- Page 7 and 8: (Cont’d)Reality….?
- Page 9 and 10: (Cont’d)IN SABAH….. ?
- Page 11 and 12: (Cont’d)Karambunai ResortKg. Lok
- Page 13 and 14: Landslide records in MalaysiaBil Ta
- Page 15: LANDSLIDE MORPHOLOGYVarnes (1978)
- Page 18 and 19: LANDSLIDE CAUSING FACTORSNatural Fa
- Page 20 and 21: (Cont’d)Non-Natural Factors: Inco
- Page 22 and 23: MATERIALS AND METHODS
- Page 24 and 25: (Cont’d)LRM Cycles (Taubenb¨ock
- Page 26 and 27: (Cont’d)
- Page 28 and 29: Rating value for landslide hazard a
- Page 30 and 31: (Cont’d)No6Landslide HazardIdenti
- Page 32 and 33: RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS
- Page 36 and 37: (Cont’d)Analysis results of rock
- Page 38 and 39: (Cont’d)Analysis results of soil
- Page 40 and 41: (Cont’d)Population Map (PM) Kota
- Page 42 and 43: (Cont’d)Family of F-N curves by P
- Page 44 and 45: (Cont’d)Definitions of "acceptanc
- Page 46 and 47: (Cont’d)3. Due to its generalized
(Cont’d)Geological mapLandslide distributions map‣ 0 o – 20 o ” (49 %)‣ 21 o – 40 o (5 % )‣ 41 o – 60 o (33%)‣ 61 o – 80 o (12%)‣> 80 o (1%)Digital elevation model (DEM)Slope gradient map