landslide management using geospatial technology (lmgt)

More documents

Recommendations

Info

(Cont’d)No6Landslide HazardIdentifica-tionsEngineeringcharacteristics ofsoils and rocksFactors Parameter Soil Shear Strength () (kN/m 2 )‣ < 20‣ 20 – 40‣ 40 – 75‣ 75 – 150‣ 150 – 300‣ > 300 Standard penetration test (SPT) (N) Cohesive soil‣ 0 – 2‣ 2 – 4‣ 4 – 8‣ 8 – 15‣ 15 – 30‣ > 30or, Non-cohesive soil‣ 0 – 4‣ 4 – 10‣ 10 – 30‣ 30 – 50‣ > 50RatingValue5.04.03.02.01.00.55.04.03.02.01.00.55.04.03.02.01.0
(Cont’d)No6LandslideHazardIdentifica-tionsEngineeringcharacteristicsof soils androcksFactors Parameter Rock Shear Stress () (kN/m 2 )‣ < 25‣ 25 – 50‣ 50 – 100‣ 100 – 250‣ > 250 Rock quality designation (RQD) (%)‣ < 25‣ 25 – 50‣ 50 – 75‣ 75 – 90‣ 90 – 100RatingValue5.04.03.02.01.05.04.03.02.01.0
Page 1 and 2: LANDSLIDE MANAGEMENT USING GEOSPATI
Page 3 and 4: INTRODUCTION Landslide - Geohazards
Page 5 and 6: DEVELOPMENT ISSUES AND LANDSLIDE IN
Page 7 and 8: (Cont’d)Reality….?
Page 9 and 10: (Cont’d)IN SABAH….. ?
Page 11 and 12: (Cont’d)Karambunai ResortKg. Lok
Page 13 and 14: Landslide records in MalaysiaBil Ta
Page 15: LANDSLIDE MORPHOLOGYVarnes (1978)
Page 18 and 19: LANDSLIDE CAUSING FACTORSNatural Fa
Page 20 and 21: (Cont’d)Non-Natural Factors: Inco
Page 22 and 23: MATERIALS AND METHODS
Page 24 and 25: (Cont’d)LRM Cycles (Taubenb¨ock
Page 26 and 27: (Cont’d)
Page 28 and 29: Rating value for landslide hazard a
Page 32 and 33: RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS
Page 34 and 35: (Cont’d)Geological mapLandslide d
Page 36 and 37: (Cont’d)Analysis results of rock
Page 38 and 39: (Cont’d)Analysis results of soil
Page 40 and 41: (Cont’d)Population Map (PM) Kota
Page 42 and 43: (Cont’d)Family of F-N curves by P
Page 44 and 45: (Cont’d)Definitions of "acceptanc
Page 46 and 47: (Cont’d)3. Due to its generalized

landslide management using geospatial technology (lmgt)

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?