An ergonomic assessment of the airline baggage handler

An ergonomic assessment of the airline baggage handler An ergonomic assessment of the airline baggage handler

archives.njit.edu
from archives.njit.edu More from this publisher
13.07.2015 Views

53The fleet service clerks, or baggage handlers, worked in the inside and outsideaircraft, baggage transfer, mail facility, cabin service and the baggage room. Some otherduties of these baggage handlers included but were not limited to manual baggage andmail transfer, from one location to another.The training class consisted of a video, booklet, hands-on training, and a booklet.A video was developed by a medical professional that discussed the anatomy of the backand spine, biomechanics related to lifting, a how-to on warm-up exercises, and home andafter injury care. The video also used real airline employees to keep its degree of realismand relativity.In conjunction with the video, the baggage handlers in this group were required toparticipate in a 30-minute class, where they would perform each lifting exercise andwarm-up technique(s) expressed in the video before an instructor. Lifting props wereprovided. The instructor critiqued the handlers on their abilities to perform eachinstruction. A booklet was used which reiterated of the techniques shown in the videoand was used in class.Data collected and used in the study included a belt questionnaire, lost workdays,restricted workdays, total number of lumbar injuries, number of lost workday case lumbarinjuries, and number of restricted workday case lumbar injuries, total workerscompensation cost, and the number of hours worked.3.6.5 Incident RateOver half of the baggage handlers stopped using the weightlifting back-belt: 158 out of272. Fifty eight percent of them stopped using the back belt before the eight-month studyperiod had ended. Of this fifty eight percent, two new treatment groups were created to

54account for them. These treatment groups now were made up of those who initiallyreceived the belt and training, and the other which initially received a belt only. Thesegroups were called the dropout groups, which were monitored to survey any effects,which may occur after the period of wearing the weightlifting back belt.There were a total of 31 injuries observed during the eight-month study period ofwhich 28 were on-the-job injuries, which were used in the analysis. Three injuries werenon job-related. These three injuries came from a belt group, a training only group, andfrom a control group. It was noted there was no correlation between the incident rate andprevious injury with r=0.0529.Overall, this study indicated that neither the belt nor training group had asignificant effect on decreasing the lumbar injury rate, rendering the question are backbelts helpful in reducing back injury, inconclusive.Statistical analysis of for lost workday case incident rate showed a marginalsignificant difference between the dropout groups, and the training group and the controlgroup. There seemed to be some connection between the increase in the number andseverity of lumbar injuries rates, and those who wore the belt in the beginning, butdecided to stop wearing the belt towards the end of the study. It was concluded that backbelts may increase the risk of injury to the lumbar area on occasion when the user is notwearing the supportive belts. It was noted in their survey that some baggage handlers feltthat they could develop a physical dependency on the belt, thus making lifting withoutthe belt more dangerous. The increase of the intra abdominal pressure (lAP) of thewearer also came with some discomfort according to the baggage handler survey. The

53The fleet service clerks, or <strong>baggage</strong> <strong>handler</strong>s, worked in <strong>the</strong> inside and outsideaircraft, <strong>baggage</strong> transfer, mail facility, cabin service and <strong>the</strong> <strong>baggage</strong> room. Some o<strong>the</strong>rduties <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se <strong>baggage</strong> <strong>handler</strong>s included but were not limited to manual <strong>baggage</strong> andmail transfer, from one location to ano<strong>the</strong>r.The training class consisted <strong>of</strong> a video, booklet, hands-on training, and a booklet.A video was developed by a medical pr<strong>of</strong>essional that discussed <strong>the</strong> anatomy <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> backand spine, biomechanics related to lifting, a how-to on warm-up exercises, and home andafter injury care. The video also used real <strong>airline</strong> employees to keep its degree <strong>of</strong> realismand relativity.In conjunction with <strong>the</strong> video, <strong>the</strong> <strong>baggage</strong> <strong>handler</strong>s in this group were required toparticipate in a 30-minute class, where <strong>the</strong>y would perform each lifting exercise andwarm-up technique(s) expressed in <strong>the</strong> video before an instructor. Lifting props wereprovided. The instructor critiqued <strong>the</strong> <strong>handler</strong>s on <strong>the</strong>ir abilities to perform eachinstruction. A booklet was used which reiterated <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> techniques shown in <strong>the</strong> videoand was used in class.Data collected and used in <strong>the</strong> study included a belt questionnaire, lost workdays,restricted workdays, total number <strong>of</strong> lumbar injuries, number <strong>of</strong> lost workday case lumbarinjuries, and number <strong>of</strong> restricted workday case lumbar injuries, total workerscompensation cost, and <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> hours worked.3.6.5 Incident RateOver half <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>baggage</strong> <strong>handler</strong>s stopped using <strong>the</strong> weightlifting back-belt: 158 out <strong>of</strong>272. Fifty eight percent <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>m stopped using <strong>the</strong> back belt before <strong>the</strong> eight-month studyperiod had ended. Of this fifty eight percent, two new treatment groups were created to

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!