An ergonomic assessment of the airline baggage handler

More documents

Recommendations

Info

45placed on various joints on the body while performing baggage handling. The results ofthe survey showed that three areas provided the highest problem for baggage handlersand the highest concerns for the evaluators. Table 3.14 provides the summary ofresponses by the baggage handlers regarding pain in lower back, knee, neck and shoulderin the previous 12 months.The analysis of the baggage handlers' task on various conveyor belts concludedthat the handlers' job has a high volume of repetition, heavy weight lifting, improperheight of conveyor belts, along with confided spaces in-between conveyor belts, posed ahigh risk for injury.
463.5.2 The Pilot TestAfter the survey and task analysis were evaluated, the Pearson Airport's two conveyersystems were modified for pilot test. The new pilot conveyer was changed from a twotiersystem to one tier. The former two-tier system had a height of 132 cm for its toplevel and 36 cm for its bottom relative to the floor. The pilot conveyor had a height of 83cm from the floor.
Page 5:
AN ERGONOMIC ASSESSMENTOF THE AIRLI
Page 8 and 9: BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCHAuthor: Stephen
Page 10 and 11: ACKNOWLEDGMENTI would like to expre
Page 12 and 13: TABLE OF CONTENTS(Continued)Chapter
Page 14 and 15: CHAPTER 1INTRODUCTION1.1 Baggage Ha
Page 16 and 17: 31.2.2 Author's PreparationMany tim
Page 18 and 19: 5way in and out of the work area. T
Page 20: 71.3.4.4 Evidence of No Effect of W
Page 23 and 24: Figure 2.1 Principle muscle groups
Page 25 and 26: 12vertebrae are aligned, their cent
Page 27 and 28: 14which obesity, poor conditioning,
Page 29 and 30: Figure 2.4 Musculature of the Later
Page 31 and 32: Figure 2.5 Anatomy of the Shoulder
Page 33 and 34: CHAPTER 3LITERATURE REVIEWS3.1 Summ
Page 35 and 36: 22loading and unloading of narrow-b
Page 37 and 38: 24When the safety professionals wer
Page 39 and 40: 26exceeded 70lbs (32kg). However, 1
Page 41: 28slowing changing along the landsc
Page 44 and 45: 31aircraft on the tarmac, the bagga
Page 46 and 47: 33baggage handlers with 111 (71%) p
Page 48 and 49: 35In response to the training quest
Page 50 and 51: 37question about loading the wide b
Page 52 and 53: 39combinations were calculated. Eac
Page 54 and 55: 41participants from the Royal Dutch
Page 56 and 57: 43The heights, angles, and velociti
Page 60 and 61: 47The purpose of introducing the pi
Page 62 and 63: 493.6 Back Belt LiteratureThe notio
Page 64 and 65: 51It was out of this necessity for
Page 66 and 67: 53The fleet service clerks, or bagg
Page 68 and 69: 55increase in TAP can increase the
Page 70 and 71: 57A concern for this study is the m
Page 72 and 73: 59A body chart diagram to assess wo
Page 74 and 75: 615.2 The Future of Baggage Handlin
Page 76 and 77: 635.2.1 Workstation RedesignThe wor
Page 78 and 79: 65injury because the top and lower
Page 80 and 81: 67baggage handlers as well as aviat
Page 82 and 83: APPENDIXMODEL FOR FUTURE BAGGAGE HA
Page 85 and 86: INSTRUCTION: PLEASE CIRCLE WHICH BO
Page 87 and 88: 74[12] Harman, E A, Rosenstein, RM,
show all

An ergonomic assessment of the airline baggage handler

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?