13.07.2015 Views

Medical Aspects of Chemical Warfare (2008) - The Black Vault

Medical Aspects of Chemical Warfare (2008) - The Black Vault

Medical Aspects of Chemical Warfare (2008) - The Black Vault

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Medical</strong> <strong>Aspects</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Chemical</strong> <strong>Warfare</strong>UN monitors withdrew from the country.In 2002 both President George W Bush and BritishPrime Minister Tony Blair publicly warnedthe UN that Iraq had reinstated its weapons <strong>of</strong>mass destruction program. <strong>The</strong> UN, however,was unconvinced <strong>of</strong> the charges and debated theneed for a new resolution concerning Iraq. In themeantime, the US Congress authorized PresidentBush to use force against Iraq if necessary. A largecoalition force assembled in Kuwait in preparationfor future military action. This force was wellequipped with the latest chemical defense equipment.Unable to obtain UN support for a military attack,the Unites States launched Operation Iraqi Freedomin 2003 with an unsuccessful attempt to eliminateSaddam Hussein. Allied troops then invaded Iraq, takinggreat precautions in case chemical weapons wereused against them. Although a few Scud missiles werelaunched against forces in Kuwait, none containedchemical agents. <strong>The</strong> occupation <strong>of</strong> Iraq was quicklyaccomplished without any known use <strong>of</strong> chemicalweapons. On May 1 President Bush publicly declaredthe end <strong>of</strong> hostilities; however, US casualties continuedto occur. At least one roadside attack involved thedetonation <strong>of</strong> a sarin-filled artillery projectile, but nocasualties resulted.Despite an extensive search, no large stockpiles <strong>of</strong>chemical weapons were discovered in Iraq. Investigatorsdid find protective masks, nerve agent antidoteinjectors, decontamination kits, and protective clothing.Interviews with captured Iraqi scientists andother leaders indicated that the chemical weaponsprograms had been shut down prior to the invasion.Some commentators speculated that the Iraqis hadpurposely misled the world about their weapons <strong>of</strong>mass destruction as a bluff to prevent military actionagainst them. Other reports indicated that some <strong>of</strong> thechemical weapons may have been shipped to Syria orother countries friendly to Iraq. Because the <strong>Chemical</strong>Weapons Convention prohibited the use <strong>of</strong> tear gas incombat, world debate arose when US forces used teargas during security operations in Iraqi cities. However,the <strong>Chemical</strong> Weapons Convention allowed tear gasuse in domestic riot control, which is how the UnitedStates had used it.Iraqi insurgents stepped up terror attacks on thestreets <strong>of</strong> Taji, north <strong>of</strong> Baghdad, in February andMarch 2007. On February 21, 2007, insurgents usedconventional explosives to detonate a tanker carryingchlorine, creating a toxic cloud. Baghdad securityspokesperson General Qassim Atta reported fivedeaths from the blast and 148 casualties from the gas.<strong>The</strong> following day, suspected Sunni Arab insurgentsdetonated a car carrying an explosive device attachedto chlorine gas canisters on a road leading to Baghdad’sairport. <strong>The</strong> gas cloud killed two and left 33 othersfeeling ill. <strong>The</strong> chlorine gas cloud suggested newand coordinated tactics with unconventional weapons.A raid in Fallujah in late February 2007 revealed ahomegrown factory for car bombs and cylinders <strong>of</strong>toxic chlorine gas and other chemicals. This discoverycaused the United States to fear future tactics withchlorine bombs, and fears were confirmed as additionalattacks involving three chlorine gas car bombswere carried out in western Iraq on March 16, 2007,killing two and injuring hundreds <strong>of</strong> Iraqi civilians.SummaryAlthough chemical warfare has not been repeated onthe scale that occurred during World War I, incidents <strong>of</strong>chemical weapons used on the battlefield have continuedthroughout the 20th and into the 21st century, and thepotential for a major escalation remains. Terrorist attackswith chemical weapons are an even more likely scenario.To prevent such an event, US military forces must continueto learn about chemical warfare and how to accomplishtheir missions on chemical battlefields and chemicalterrorist fronts throughout the world. In the words <strong>of</strong>General Pershing, “we can never afford to neglect thequestion” 48(p77) <strong>of</strong> chemical preparedness again.References1. Department <strong>of</strong> the Army. NATO Handbook on the <strong>Medical</strong> <strong>Aspects</strong> <strong>of</strong> NBC Defensive Operations. AMedP-6, Part 3. Washington,DC: DA; 1996: Field Manual 8-9.2. Osius TG. <strong>The</strong> historic art <strong>of</strong> poisoning. Med Bull (Ann Arbor). 1957;23:111–116.3. Mayor A. Greek Fire, Poison Arrows, and Scorpion Bombs: Biological and <strong>Chemical</strong> <strong>Warfare</strong> in the Ancient World.Woodstock, NY: Overlook Press; 2003.4. Smart JK. History <strong>of</strong> <strong>Chemical</strong> and Biological <strong>Warfare</strong> Fact Sheets. Aberdeen Proving Ground, Md: US Army <strong>Chemical</strong>and Biological Defense Command; 1996. Special Study 50.66

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!