13.07.2015 Views

Medical Aspects of Chemical Warfare (2008) - The Black Vault

Medical Aspects of Chemical Warfare (2008) - The Black Vault

Medical Aspects of Chemical Warfare (2008) - The Black Vault

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

History <strong>of</strong> <strong>Chemical</strong> <strong>Warfare</strong>assigned to the new Combat Development Command;and the logistical function, including all arsenals,laboratories, and proving grounds, was assigned tothe new Army Materiel Command. 145<strong>The</strong> effects <strong>of</strong> the reorganization were quickly felt.Within 2 years, the chemical warfare training programhad significantly improved. One junior <strong>of</strong>ficer, A Harrigan,described the changes:We have set up special 40-hour or 80-hour schoolsso that we can have a trained CBR [chemical-biological-radiological]<strong>of</strong>ficer and noncommissioned <strong>of</strong>ficerin every company-sized unit. We have assigneda chemical <strong>of</strong>ficer down to brigade, and a chemicaloperations sergeant down to battalion. We set asidea certain number <strong>of</strong> hours annually for classroominstruction for the troops. We set up special blocks<strong>of</strong> instruction for surveying and monitoring teams.We list CBR defense as a subject integrated into ourtraining schedules, and we may even throw tear gasgrenades or other agents at troops in the field. 145(p16)Harrigan, however, concluded that more realistic fieldtraining was still required to prepare soldiers for themodern battlefield with nuclear weapons and nerveagents. 145Beginning <strong>of</strong> the Vietnam War<strong>The</strong> growing guerrilla war in South Vietnam madethe Army again reexamine its training program, chemicalwarfare readiness, and no-first-use policy. In 1963one observer stated that, “after years <strong>of</strong> almost totallack <strong>of</strong> interest, the U.S. has taken up guerrilla warfaretraining as though it were something new under thesun.” 146(p12) As part <strong>of</strong> that sudden interest, the role <strong>of</strong>chemical weapons again came under intense scrutinyand debate. That same year, Harrigan wrote in theArmed Forces <strong>Chemical</strong> Journal, “the best way for the U.S.to achieve its military aims in Southeast Asia wouldbe to rely on chemical warfare.” 146(p12) He describedhow soldiers could “sanitize” a large area with gasesand sprays that killed everything from vegetation tohumans. 146In 1966 a retired US Army general suggested thatmustard gas be used to clear Vietnamese tunnels. Hethought the use <strong>of</strong> low-lethality chemicals would saveboth American and Vietnamese lives by rendering thetunnels useless. 147 Other observers and authors alsorecommended revising the no-first-use policy. Publicopinion and national policy opposing the use <strong>of</strong> toxicchemicals was apparently the deciding factor againsttheir employment. <strong>The</strong> Army did, however, utilizedefoliants and nonlethal riot control agents in largequantities. <strong>The</strong> negative worldwide response requiredthe Army to make clear the differences between lethaland nonlethal chemicals.<strong>The</strong> expansion <strong>of</strong> hostilities in Vietnam caused agradual rise in the level <strong>of</strong> development and procurement<strong>of</strong> chemical-warfare–related items. By virtue <strong>of</strong>their training and specialized equipment, <strong>Chemical</strong>Corps personnel were able to make a number <strong>of</strong> contributions,primarily in the areas <strong>of</strong> riot control andflame weapons.Yemen Civil WarWhile the United States was becoming involvedin the Vietnam War, a small war in the Middle Eastbrought the subject <strong>of</strong> chemical warfare back from thehypothetical. In September 1962, just after the death<strong>of</strong> Imam Ahmad, a military coup <strong>of</strong> Yemeni dissidentsoverthrew the royalist monarchy and declared a republic.<strong>The</strong> new imam escaped assassination and retreatedwith his royalist forces into the mountains <strong>of</strong> northernYemen, initiating a counter revolt against the republicanforces. Egyptian President Gamal Abdul Nasserrecognized the new republic and sent military forces tohelp defeat the royalist troops, who were supported bythe kingdoms <strong>of</strong> Saudi Arabia, Iran, and later Jordan,straining inter-Arab tensions, mainly between SaudiArabia and Egypt. 148,149Egyptian efforts to defeat the royalist forces anddestroy their civilian support bases proved particularlydifficult in the mountainous terrain <strong>of</strong> northernYemen. Frustrated by the successful royalist guerrillatactics, Egypt employed chemical weapons they haddeveloped in the 1950s and obtained from the SovietUnion; defensive equipment was also obtained fromthe Soviets. 150 Egypt was the first Arab state to usechemical weapons. Despite having signed the 1925Geneva Convention, which outlawed the use <strong>of</strong> chemicalweapons, Egypt employed chloroacetophenonetear gas, mustard blistering gas, phosgene, and nerveagents repeatedly from 1963 to1967. 151Some <strong>of</strong> these chemical weapons were made in militaryplant no. 801 in Abu-Za’abal, near Cairo. Egypt receivedmustard-gas–filled KHAB-200 R5 aerial bombsand phosgene-filled AOKh-25 aerial bombs from theSoviet air force and secured numerous mustard-filledshells from British stocks abandoned in Egypt afterWorld War II. 149,152,153 Some accounts attributed thechemical weapons to German scientists, usually describedas Nazis, who had been brought to Egypt byPresident Nasser. Several sources reported that theSoviet Union, through its friendship with Egypt, usedYemen as a testing ground for its chemical researchprogram. Other reports mentioned Communist Chinaas the supplier. 154–16157

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!