13.07.2015 Views

Medical Aspects of Chemical Warfare (2008) - The Black Vault

Medical Aspects of Chemical Warfare (2008) - The Black Vault

Medical Aspects of Chemical Warfare (2008) - The Black Vault

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Medical</strong> <strong>Aspects</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Chemical</strong> <strong>Warfare</strong><strong>The</strong> network first became operational in 1999 in accordancewith Presidential Decision Directive 39 under theDHHS and CDC. 1 <strong>The</strong> network brings together expertsfrom various agencies to coordinate sample testing andto increase laboratory capability. Agencies participatingin this program include the CDC, the DHS, the USEnvironmental Protection Agency, the US Department<strong>of</strong> Agriculture, the US Food and Drug Administration,the DoD, the DHHS, and other federal agencies,as well as international, state, and local public healthlaboratories. <strong>The</strong>re are currently over 100 laboratoriesparticipating in the network. 33Laboratories are categorized according to their capabilitiesand responses into sentinel, reference, andnational laboratories. Sentinel laboratories processsamples for routine diagnostic purposes and determineif the samples should be shipped to reference and nationallaboratories. Reference laboratories (there are approximately140) are federal, military, and internationallaboratories that specialize in veterinary, agricultural,food, water, or soil testing. National laboratories (eg,the CDC or military labs) perform definitive testingwhen required. 33 Some examples <strong>of</strong> these tests includecholinesterase testing done at USACHPPM, thiodiglycoltesting at USAMRICD, and several biological testsperformed at the CDC and USAMRIID.<strong>Chemical</strong> Preparedness Programs and InitiativesIn 1985 Congress mandated destroying all the USchemical agent and munitions stockpiles. <strong>The</strong> originaldate <strong>of</strong> completion for this project was 1994; however,the date was extended to 2007 after the US Senateratified the destruction <strong>of</strong> chemical weapons duringthe <strong>Chemical</strong> Weapons Convention in April 1997.Congress also directed that the well being and safety<strong>of</strong> the environment and the general public be protectedin and around the areas <strong>of</strong> the eight chemical weaponsstorage sites. This direction led to the <strong>Chemical</strong>Stockpile Emergency Preparedness Program (CSEPP),established in 1988 and revised in 1995. 34A memorandum <strong>of</strong> understanding (MOU), issued inMarch 2004, directs the Department <strong>of</strong> the Army andDHS (through FEMA) to identify their respective rolesand efforts in emergency response preparedness in theareas surrounding the remaining seven stockpile sites<strong>of</strong> chemical munitions. 35,36 <strong>The</strong> Army is the custodianfor these stockpiles and FEMA provides guidance,funding, resources, and training. Other agencies lendsupport as needed through expert consultants. <strong>The</strong>seagencies include the US Environmental ProtectionAgency and the DHHS. Currently the Army stockpilessites are:• Anniston <strong>Chemical</strong> Activity (Anniston, Alabama)• Blue Grass <strong>Chemical</strong> Activity (Richmond,Kentucky)• Newport <strong>Chemical</strong> Depot (Newport, Indiana)• Pine Bluff <strong>Chemical</strong> Activity (Pine Bluff Arsenal,Arkansas)• Pueblo <strong>Chemical</strong> Depot (Pueblo, Colorado)• Tooele <strong>Chemical</strong> Activity (Tooele Army Depot,Utah)• Umatilla <strong>Chemical</strong> Depot (Hermiston, Oregon)<strong>The</strong> risk to the local communities in and aroundthe seven chemical storage sites in the United Statesremains. <strong>The</strong> greatest risk is a natural or humanmadeevent that causes the release <strong>of</strong> chemical agentsfrom these storage facilities. <strong>The</strong>re is a direct linkbetween destroying the stockpiles under the chemicaldemilitarization program (see Chapter 4, History<strong>of</strong> the <strong>Chemical</strong> Threat, <strong>Chemical</strong> Terrorism, and ItsImplications for Military Medicine) and the emergencypreparedness plan. Officials in states and countieswhere these demilitarization sites are located musthave emergency preparedness initiatives in placebefore destruction operations begin. Budgeting andfunding for CSEPP are primarily approved throughthe Army after funding requirements are outlined bythe states and counties. <strong>The</strong> Army, FEMA, and stateand local communities need a constant, proactiveapproach to disaster preparedness. Several areas <strong>of</strong>continuous improvement are crucial to the success <strong>of</strong>the demilitarization program, such as applying lessonslearned, having better relations with state and localcommunities, and providing assistance and guidanceto states on technical assistance and leadership. 36<strong>The</strong>se chemical depot communities exercise preparednessand assess the effectiveness and capabilities<strong>of</strong> federal, state, and local response organizations.CSEPP exercises consist <strong>of</strong> two types: federally managedexercises and alternative year exercises. Federallymanaged exercises, led by Army and FEMA codirectors,involve mobilization <strong>of</strong> emergency facilities,command posts, and communications centers and arefederally mandated evaluations <strong>of</strong> a community’s capabilityto respond to a chemical accident or incident.<strong>The</strong> alternative year exercise is used by the communityto assess its training needs, review standard operatingprocedures, and evaluate resources, equipment, andpersonnel. Other exercises include tabletop reme-766

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!