13.07.2015 Views

Medical Aspects of Chemical Warfare (2008) - The Black Vault

Medical Aspects of Chemical Warfare (2008) - The Black Vault

Medical Aspects of Chemical Warfare (2008) - The Black Vault

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Medical</strong> <strong>Aspects</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Chemical</strong> <strong>Warfare</strong>the Iran-Iraq war, a small number <strong>of</strong> samples from individualsexposed to sulfur mustard in laboratory andfield situations were collected, stored, and analyzedusing more recently developed methods.Some <strong>of</strong> sulfur mustard’s physical properties andbiochemical reactions are addressed in this volume(see Chapter 8, Vesicants) and have been reviewedextensively elsewhere. 78 Of primary importance inthe development <strong>of</strong> assays for sulfur mustard is theformation <strong>of</strong> a highly reactive sulfonium ion that isproduced following cyclization <strong>of</strong> an ethylene group <strong>of</strong>sulfur mustard. <strong>The</strong> sulfonium ion readily reacts withnucleophiles, such as water, or combines with a variety<strong>of</strong> nucleophilic sites in macromolecules. <strong>The</strong> resultingchemical reactions are able to produce a number <strong>of</strong> freemetabolites and stable adducts that can be exploitedfor analysis in blood, urine, and tissue samples. 7,79,80This section focuses primarily on metabolites thathave been identified in biomedical samples from sulfurmustard casualties.Before the early 1990s analytical methods for verifyingexposure to sulfur mustard consisted <strong>of</strong> assaysfor the unmetabolized compound or the hydrolysisproduct TDG. Since 1995 a number <strong>of</strong> significantadvances have occurred. Many new metabolites havebeen identified from specimens <strong>of</strong> sulfur-mustard–exposedindividuals, and instrument advances, suchas the ability to interface LC with MS and the use <strong>of</strong>tandem MS, have resulted in significant increases intest sensitivity and selectivity. Most newer methods<strong>of</strong> verifying exposure to sulfur mustard require extensivesample processing prior to introduction intothe analytical system. <strong>The</strong> use <strong>of</strong> MS has enabled theincorporation <strong>of</strong> isotopically labeled forms <strong>of</strong> analytesfor use as internal standards during the earliest stages<strong>of</strong> sample preparation. This has resulted in greaterreproducibility <strong>of</strong> assays and made them more amenableto quantitative analysis. Although the laboratorymethods presented in this section are not consideredroutine or standard, the efforts by a small number <strong>of</strong>laboratories worldwide that are active in this area <strong>of</strong>research have made the methods more attainable to awider range <strong>of</strong> laboratories.Analysis <strong>of</strong> Urine Samples<strong>The</strong>re are currently five urinary metabolites <strong>of</strong> primaryinterest in verifying exposure to sulfur mustard.Two <strong>of</strong> the metabolites, TDG and thiodiglycol sulfoxide(TDG-sulfoxide), are derived from chemical hydrolysisreactions (Figure 22-6). <strong>The</strong> other three productsare formed following sulfur mustard’s reaction withglutathione (GSH). Each <strong>of</strong> the five analytes has beenidentified in the urine <strong>of</strong> sulfur-mustard–exposedindividuals.Analytical MethodsEfforts to analyze specific biomarkers <strong>of</strong> sulfur mustardexposure in urine samples prior to 1995 targetedeither unmetabolized sulfur mustard or TDG (Table22-6). Vycudilik prepared urine samples by initiallysaturating them with sodium chloride followed byorganic extraction using diethylether. <strong>The</strong> organic portionwas evaporated under nitrogen and reconstitutedwith methylene chloride. After the addition <strong>of</strong> silicagel, the methylene chloride was evaporated undernitrogen, reconstituted with solvent, and analyzedusing GC-MS. 81 Vycudilik later modified the methodto isolate possible conjugates <strong>of</strong> sulfur mustard. 82 <strong>The</strong>primary difference in the latter study was the addition<strong>of</strong> strong acid to the urine samples. Urine sampleswere mixed with an equal amount <strong>of</strong> concentratedhydrochloric acid and saturated with sodium chloride.Using steam distillation, the distillate was collectedin ether. Following sodium chloride saturation <strong>of</strong>the aqueous layer, the ether layer was dried and theresidue dissolved in methylene chloride and silica gel.Samples were analyzed using GC and high-resolutionMS. Vycudilik reported that the methods could not distinguishbetween sulfur mustard and its hydroxyethylmetabolites present in the urine samples. 82Wils et al treated urine with concentrated hydrochloricacid to convert TDG back to sulfur mustard. 83,84Two methods were reported, only the later methodis described here. <strong>The</strong> urine was passed through twoC18 solid phase extraction cartridges. Next, a solutionCH 2 CH 2 ClCH 2 CH 2 OHCH 2 CH 2 OHO CH 2 CH 2 OHSSOSSCH 2 CH 2 ClSulfur Mustard (HD)CH 2 CH 2 OHThiodiglycol (TDG)CH 2 CH 2 OHTDG sulfoxideO CH 2 CH 2 OHTDG sulfoneFig. 22-6. Hydrolysis <strong>of</strong> sulfur mustard to produce thiodiglycol, followed by oxidation reactions.HD: sulfur mustardTDG: thiodiglycol708

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!