13.07.2015 Views

Medical Aspects of Chemical Warfare (2008) - The Black Vault

Medical Aspects of Chemical Warfare (2008) - The Black Vault

Medical Aspects of Chemical Warfare (2008) - The Black Vault

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Medical</strong> <strong>Chemical</strong> Defense Acquisition Programsto take the drug.Peculiarities <strong>of</strong> medical chemical drug developmentcreate even greater challenges. For example, unlike anaturally occurring microbial illness, the disorderscaused by chemical warfare agents are not expectedto occur in the general population on a regular basis.Thus, the standard model for testing drugs in clinicaltrials is insufficient because exposing volunteers tochemical warfare agents is unethical. Consequently, theusual route for testing and demonstrating both safetyand efficacy <strong>of</strong> medical countermeasures in humans isnot feasible. In 2002 the FDA recognized this problem,unique to chemical and biological warfare countermeasuredevelopment, and released the animal rule. As aresult, the FDA will consider approving medical chemical,biological, and radiological countermeasures whenhuman safety data and sufficient animal efficacy dataare presented without definitive human efficacy data.This rule allows for the submission <strong>of</strong> well-controlledanimal efficacy data, in multiple species, to demonstratethat the product is likely to have clinical benefitsin humans, in lieu <strong>of</strong> definitive human efficacy studies.So far, only two products have been fully licensed bythe FDA under this rule, pyridostigmine bromide forpretreatment against soman poisoning, approved in2003 (see Chapter 5, Nerve Agents), and hydroxocobalamin,approved as an antidote for cyanide poisoningin 2007. So far, the animal rule has only been used forproducts specifically intended for medical chemical defense,but several products in advanced developmentinclude plans to use the animal rule in their regulatorydevelopment strategies as necessary.Another challenge encountered during medicalchemical drug development concerns the specificindications for which a drug is used in medical chemicaldefense. Although all <strong>of</strong> the classical organophosphorusnerve agents work by inhibiting the enzymeacetylcholinesterase, under a narrow reading <strong>of</strong> thestatute, to obtain FDA approval for all potentially encounteredbattlefield nerve agents, DoD would haveto obtain FDA approval against each individual nerveagent. Instead, DoD plans to seek FDA approval fora whole class <strong>of</strong> acetylcholinesterase inhibitors. Asmentioned earlier, pyridostigmine bromide carriespretreatment licensed indication only against soman.This issue is a matter <strong>of</strong> present discussion with theFDA, but remains unresolved.Specific manufacturing challenges exist and arealso <strong>of</strong> concern to the FDA and the advanced developer.Stereoisomers (chiral forms <strong>of</strong> molecules) andpolymorphisms (multiple crystal forms <strong>of</strong> the samemolecules) must always be considered and the licensedcompound’s purity must be ensured. Impurities mustbe removed or minimized and characterized. A specificmedical chemical defense challenge is that drugs must<strong>of</strong>ten be formulated for compatibility and bioavailabilityin an autoinjector delivery system, which israrely used in other drug development programs. Thischallenge was met by the antidote treatment nerveagent autoinjector (ATNAA) program, in which theactual dose <strong>of</strong> atropine in the autoinjector had to bemodified.STATUS OF ACQUISITION PROGRAMS OF RECORD<strong>The</strong> programs <strong>of</strong> record in medical chemical defensewithin the DoD may be divided into three categories:lifecycle management products (fielded), sustainmentprograms (FDA-approved products; post-marketing orPhase 4 trials required), and advanced developmentprograms (products not yet fielded). 5Lifecycle Management ProductsSeveral products have gained full FDA approvalfor an intended indication and are presently fielded.<strong>The</strong> Mark I (Meridian <strong>Medical</strong> Technologies Inc,Bristol, Tenn) nerve agent antidote kit descends fromthe AtroPen (Meridian <strong>Medical</strong> Technologies Inc), anatropine autoinjector, first developed in the 1950s fornerve agent and insecticide poisoning (see Chapter 5,Nerve Agents). <strong>The</strong> Mark I kit consists <strong>of</strong> an atropineautoinjector and a second autoinjector containing2-pralidoxime chloride (2-PAM Cl). It achieved FDAapproval in the 1980s and is the mainstay <strong>of</strong> fieldednerve agent antidotes. As such, it has a large hold onthe civilian and military markets. <strong>The</strong> Mark I is beingphased out and replaced with the ATNAA.<strong>The</strong> convulsant antidote nerve agent (CANA) is anautoinjector for intramuscular administration <strong>of</strong> 10 mg<strong>of</strong> diazepam. <strong>The</strong> CANA is used as an anticonvulsantfor nerve agent poisoning and was FDA approvedin December 1990. It is the only approved treatmentspecifically for nerve-agent–induced seizures. <strong>The</strong>autoinjector has a unique shape that allows a medicor buddy to distinguish it from Mark I, ATNAA,atropine-only, and other autoinjectors in a situation<strong>of</strong> light discipline.<strong>The</strong> medical aerosolized nerve agent antidote(MANAA) is an aerosol inhaler that contains atropineand was developed as a follow-on treatment fornerve agent casualties under medical supervision.It is intended for use after administration <strong>of</strong> eitherMark I or ATNAA and after the casualty has been decontaminatedand transferred to a clean environment651

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!