13.07.2015 Views

Medical Aspects of Chemical Warfare (2008) - The Black Vault

Medical Aspects of Chemical Warfare (2008) - The Black Vault

Medical Aspects of Chemical Warfare (2008) - The Black Vault

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Medical</strong> <strong>Aspects</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Chemical</strong> <strong>Warfare</strong>stressed the need for a central establishment, one that After 1919 almost all the work <strong>of</strong> the CWS movedcovered all aspects <strong>of</strong> chemical warfare. He drew on to Edgewood Arsenal, Maryland, with only the headquartersremaining in Washington, DC. Edgewoodthe lessons learned from the Great War, saying:became the center <strong>of</strong> training, stockpiling, and researchHad there been a chemical <strong>Warfare</strong> Service in 1915 and development. Initially, the CWS was authorizedwhen the first gas attack was made, we would have to train only its own troops in all aspects <strong>of</strong> chemicalbeen fully prepared with gases and masks, and the warfare while other Army elements were permitteddefensive training only. <strong>The</strong> CWS protested thisArmy would have been trained in its use. This wouldhave saved thousands <strong>of</strong> gas cases, the war mightlimitation and finally in May 1930, the judge advocateeasily have been shortened six months or even a year,and untold misery and wasted wealth might have general ruled that both <strong>of</strong>fensive and defensive trainingwas allowed for all troops. 64been saved. 61(p4)Leftover stocks <strong>of</strong> chemicals from World War I wereFries also disagreed with the premise that treaties deemed sufficient for the Army’s stockpile. In 1922,could prevent warfare:to comply with the Limitation <strong>of</strong> Arms Conference,the War Department ordered that “the filling <strong>of</strong> allResearches into poisonous gases cannot be suppressed.Why? Because they can be carried on in out-discontinued, except for the limited number neededprojectiles and containers with poisonous gas will be<strong>of</strong>-the-way cellar rooms, where complete plans may in perfecting gas-defense appliances.” 65 <strong>The</strong> CWS wasbe worked out to change existing industrial chemical only allowed to continue limited research and developmentbased on predictions <strong>of</strong> future wars. 65,66plants into full capacity poisonous gas plants on afortnight’s notice, and who will be the wiser? 23(p3)At the close <strong>of</strong> the 1920s, the CWS formalized thestandardization <strong>of</strong> chemical agents. Seven chemicalAlthough Fries’s comments were persuasive and agents and smokes were selected as the most important.<strong>The</strong> seven, with their symbols, were as follows:eloquent, a young lieutenant more graphically expressedthe opinion <strong>of</strong> those who understood thenature <strong>of</strong> chemical warfare in a 1919 poem:• mustard agent (HS; “H” for Hun-St<strong>of</strong>fe,“S” for the 25% solvent added to form crude<strong>The</strong>re is nothing in war more important than gasmustard. “D” later replaced the “S,” signifying<strong>The</strong> man who neglects it himself is an assdistilled or purified mustard);<strong>The</strong> unit Commander whose training is slack62(cover iv)Might just as well stab all his men in the back.• methyldifluorarsine (MD);• diphenylaminechlorarsine (DM);Proponents for a chemical warfare service won the• chloroacetophenone (CN);debate. On July 1, 1920, the CWS became a permanent• titanium tetrachloride (FM);part <strong>of</strong> the Regular Army. Its mission included developing,procuring, and supplying all <strong>of</strong>fensive and• white phosphorus (WP); and• hexachlorethane (HC).defensive chemical warfare material, together withsimilar functions in the fields <strong>of</strong> smoke and incendiaryPhosgene (CG) and lewisite (L) were considered lessweapons. In addition, the CWS was made responsibleimportant. Chloropicrin (PS) and chlorine (Cl) werefor training the Army in chemical warfare and for organizing,equipping, training, and employing specialrated the least important. 4chemical troops. 27,63New US PolicyLean Years for the <strong>Chemical</strong> <strong>Warfare</strong> ServiceFurther international attempts to ban not only theuse <strong>of</strong> chemical weapons but also all research, production,and training elicited a response that developedDespite having gained permanent status, the yearsafter 1920 were lean ones for the CWS and the Army asinto a new US policy on chemical warfare. Armya whole. <strong>The</strong> CWS was authorized 100 Regular ArmyChief <strong>of</strong> Staff General Douglas MacArthur stated<strong>of</strong>ficers but never actually achieved that number. <strong>The</strong>the policy in a letter to Secretary <strong>of</strong> State Henry Llow point was 64 <strong>of</strong>ficers in 1923. Enlisted strengthStimson in 1932:dropped to a low <strong>of</strong> 261 in 1919 and averaged about 400In the matter <strong>of</strong> chemical warfare, the War Departmentopposes any restrictions whereby the Unitedthe rest <strong>of</strong> the decade. Civilian employees numberedless than a thousand. <strong>The</strong> low point in funds was in States would refrain from all peacetime preparationor manufacture <strong>of</strong> gases, means <strong>of</strong> 1923, when the budget was $600,000. 27 launching44

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!