13.07.2015 Views

Medical Aspects of Chemical Warfare (2008) - The Black Vault

Medical Aspects of Chemical Warfare (2008) - The Black Vault

Medical Aspects of Chemical Warfare (2008) - The Black Vault

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Medical</strong> <strong>Aspects</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Chemical</strong> <strong>Warfare</strong>Fig. 2-32. American Expeditionary Forces gas casualties in World War I. Casualty statistics reflect those Americans treated inAmerican, French, British, and Belgian field hospitals. <strong>The</strong> categories “Not Distributed” and “Other” reflect those Americanunits not organized into divisions.ber <strong>of</strong> gas cases in the surgeon general’s records. Basehospitals <strong>of</strong> the French and British divisions receivedmany <strong>of</strong> the early AEF chemical casualties. <strong>The</strong>refore,these American casualties were either not statisticallyrecorded as chemical casualties or were counted underBritish or French statistics.In addition, gas <strong>of</strong>ficers, who were responsiblefor compiling chemical casualty statistics, arrivedin Europe after the first few AEF divisions. Consequently,they were unable to tally chemical casualtystatistics early in the war, when lack <strong>of</strong> discipline inthe trenches caused the greatest numbers <strong>of</strong> chemicalcasualties.Also, chemical casualties from inhalation were difficultto prove because only pulmonary signs and symptomswere evident. <strong>Medical</strong> personnel viewed soldierswith no clear dermatological signs and symptoms asneurotic malingerers feigning illnesses to leave the frontlines. Although pulmonary intoxication from chemicalweapons was common, death was <strong>of</strong>ten the result <strong>of</strong>influenza, a major problem in World War I. <strong>Chemical</strong>toxicity as the result <strong>of</strong> inhalational or dermal exposureto agents <strong>of</strong>ten led to bacterial infection and death.Base hospitals underestimated the effects <strong>of</strong> chemicalson casualties because many mortalities were talliedas death secondary to influenza, rather than from theinitial chemical insult. <strong>The</strong> majority <strong>of</strong> the gas casualtyreports filed included immediate deaths only (mostlikely due to a combination <strong>of</strong> shrapnel and gas); they<strong>of</strong>ten did not include deaths from gas exposure thatoccurred days or weeks later. <strong>Chemical</strong> shelling wasalso the cause <strong>of</strong> many cases <strong>of</strong> “psychoneuroses.” Foodcontamination from dispersed chemicals in the air wasa major paranoia among World War I soldiers.<strong>The</strong> 1920sAn international push to ban chemical weaponsfollowed the conclusion <strong>of</strong> the war (see Chapter 4).Despite the treaties, rumors <strong>of</strong> chemical warfare attacksplagued the world throughout the 1920s. Besides theUnited States and the major World War I powers, severalother countries began to develop chemical warfarecapabilities, and some countries put their capabilitiesinto operation. During the Russian civil war and Alliedintervention in the early 1920s, both sides had chemicalweapons and isolated chemical attacks were reported.Later accounts accused the British, French, andSpanish <strong>of</strong> using chemical warfare at various timesduring the 1920s. 4,53 <strong>The</strong> Berber-led resistance movementagainst French and Spanish colonialism in42

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!