13.07.2015 Views

Medical Aspects of Chemical Warfare (2008) - The Black Vault

Medical Aspects of Chemical Warfare (2008) - The Black Vault

Medical Aspects of Chemical Warfare (2008) - The Black Vault

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Medical</strong> <strong>Aspects</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Chemical</strong> <strong>Warfare</strong>this delivery system by developing the Livens projector,an 8-in, mortar-like tube that shot or projected acylinder into the enemy’s lines (Figures 4-4 and 4-5).Its range was 1,700 yd, with a flight time <strong>of</strong> 25 seconds.<strong>The</strong> Livens system had several problems; a battery <strong>of</strong>the projectors required extensive preparation becausethey were electrically fired and could not be movedonce they were set up, and a battery could normallyonly be emplaced and fired once a day. This limitedmobility required the element <strong>of</strong> surprise to preventthe Germans from taking counter measures.British 4-in trench mortars, called “Stokes mortars”(Figure 4-6), provided a solution to some <strong>of</strong> the problemswith the Livens projectors. Stokes mortars did notrequire extensive preparation and could be moved asneeded. Because it was not rifled, the mortar’s rangewas only 1,200 yd, which meant about a 14-secondflight time. <strong>The</strong> small shell held only about 6 to 9 lb <strong>of</strong>agent, but experienced gunners could fire 25 roundsper minute. American troops used both Livens projectorsand Stokes mortars during the war. An Americanversion <strong>of</strong> the Stokes mortar failed to reach the frontbefore the end <strong>of</strong> the war.In addition to the special chemical weapons, theCWS fired chemical rounds from 75-mm, 4.7-in, 155-mm, and larger caliber guns. Many <strong>of</strong> these guns hadranges <strong>of</strong> 5 to 10 miles and payloads <strong>of</strong> as much as 50lb <strong>of</strong> agent. Because <strong>of</strong> a shortage <strong>of</strong> shell parts and thelate completion <strong>of</strong> US shell-filling plants, US artilleryprimarily fired French chemical rounds. 2,4,5<strong>The</strong> 1920s<strong>The</strong> 1920s brought reports <strong>of</strong> isolated chemicalattacks during the Russian civil war, as well as lateraccounts <strong>of</strong> the British, French, and Spanish usingchemical weapons at various times during the decade(see chapter 2). 6 In addition, reports <strong>of</strong> Italy’s developingchemical warfare service particularly alarmed theUnited States. 7–9 <strong>The</strong> CWS improved various deliverysystems for chemical weapons during the 1920s. Asearly as 1920, Captain Lewis M McBride experimentedwith rifling the barrel <strong>of</strong> the Stokes mortar, and in1924 a rifled Stokes mortar barrel was tested. Truingthe inside diameter <strong>of</strong> the 4-in barrel before riflingexpanded the bore’s diameter to 4.2 in. This increasedthe range <strong>of</strong> the mortar from 1,100 yd (0.63 miles) to2,400 yd (1.3 miles). In 1928 the improved mortar wasstandardized as the M1 4.2-in chemical mortar andbecame the CWS’s prized ground weapon for deliveringtoxic chemical agents as well as smoke and highexplosives. 5An expanded role for airplanes in the next chemicalwar was predicted in 1920:<strong>The</strong> dropping <strong>of</strong> gas bombs <strong>of</strong> all kinds upon assemblypoints, concentration camps, rest areas and theFig. 4-4. A battery <strong>of</strong> dug-in Livens projectors, with one gasshell and its propellant charge shown in the foreground.Electrically-controlled salvo firing was the usual mode <strong>of</strong>operation. Emplacement was a slow process that limited thepossibility <strong>of</strong> a surprise attack.Photograph: Courtesy <strong>of</strong> Research, Development and EngineeringCommand Historical Research and Response Team,Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland.Fig. 4-5. Sectionalized view <strong>of</strong> a Livens projectile. <strong>The</strong> centraltube contains a small explosive charge, which, whendetonated by the contact fuse, breaks the shell, aiding in thedissemination <strong>of</strong> the chemical agent. <strong>The</strong> usual weight <strong>of</strong> thechemical agent was 30 lb; the shell weighed an additional30 lb. Photograph: Courtesy <strong>of</strong> Research, Development andEngineering Command Historical Research and ResponseTeam, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland.118

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!