13.07.2015 Views

Medical Aspects of Chemical Warfare (2008) - The Black Vault

Medical Aspects of Chemical Warfare (2008) - The Black Vault

Medical Aspects of Chemical Warfare (2008) - The Black Vault

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Medical</strong> <strong>Aspects</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Chemical</strong> <strong>Warfare</strong>Projections for the Future <strong>of</strong> <strong>Chemical</strong> Casualty management<strong>The</strong> historical key to the success <strong>of</strong> managingchemical casualties has unfortunately been hands-onexperience. Today’s military medical community hasno residency or specialty training in disaster or terrormedicine other than that <strong>of</strong>fered at the US Army <strong>Medical</strong>Research Institute <strong>of</strong> <strong>Chemical</strong> Defense. LieutenantColonel Edward Vedder’s “course for medical <strong>of</strong>ficers”has evolved into comprehensive training for all facets<strong>of</strong> the US government and allied countries as well.Modern audiovisual technologies now bring trainingto the battlefield. When communication elementssupport it, an organizational interface with medicaland chemical experts in personnel, intelligence, operations,research, and logistics can provide “reach-back”capabilities for combat decision-makers and their staffs(Figure 3-19). <strong>The</strong> potential for a trained and confidentchemical casualty manager exists if command is willingto engage.As demand for specialty training increases, the medicalcommunity must modify its organization to encompasschemical casualty managers. Educational communitiesmust consider providing residency in specialtiesincluding disaster or terror medicine and subspecialtiesthat address the spectrum <strong>of</strong> chemical casualty management.As long as soldiers are unprepared to managechemical casualties, sources with the capability to usechemical weapons will engage those capabilities to theirbest strategic and tactical advantage.SUMMARYCombatants respond to a current war in the mannerin which they conducted the previous one. In terms<strong>of</strong> employing medical assets on a chemical battlefield,World War I saw units on both sides <strong>of</strong> the battlefieldperforming reactively rather than proactively. After allthe lessons learned in World War I, the chemical casualties<strong>of</strong> the Bari disaster found themselves medicallymanaged by physicians who were still unable to meetthe minimum standard <strong>of</strong> care for chemical casualties.After World War II, the fate <strong>of</strong> the chemical casualtyfell into the hands <strong>of</strong> medical personnel untrained inthe appropriate medical management. This disconnectamong experts in chemical warfare, military medicine,and military personnel must be addressed so thatcasualties on the chemical battlefield have the servicesupport system that yields the greatest chance for success.Today, when terrorists are sufficiently organizedto bring chemicals to the home front, base hospitals,military medical centers, and other medical treatmentfacilities must be competently prepared for chemicalcasualties.Lieutenant Colonel Vedder studied with medicalhistorian Richard Shryock, who suggested that allsciences must pass through stages <strong>of</strong> development.Vedder said <strong>of</strong> Shryock:Fig. 3-19. This poster from World War I was designed toencourage enthusiasm for quality assurance among womenwho manufactured protective masks.Reproduced from: Pictorial History, Gas Defense Division,<strong>Chemical</strong> <strong>Warfare</strong> Service. Vol 5. Edgewood Historical Files.Located at: <strong>Chemical</strong> and Biological Defense CommandHistorical Research and Response Team, Aberdeen ProvingGround, Md.In his landmark work, <strong>The</strong> Development <strong>of</strong> ModernMedicine, Shryock postulates that all sciences, includingmedicine, must pass through four stages <strong>of</strong>development. <strong>The</strong> first is a period <strong>of</strong> minimal observationand maximal theoretical synthesis. <strong>The</strong> secondis an early attempt at objectivity and measurement.<strong>The</strong> third stage sees a partial lapse <strong>of</strong> quantitativeprocedures due to unforeseen difficulties, while thefourth is a revival <strong>of</strong> such procedures with “a finalvictory for modern technology.”108

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!