13.07.2015 Views

Medical Aspects of Chemical Warfare (2008) - The Black Vault

Medical Aspects of Chemical Warfare (2008) - The Black Vault

Medical Aspects of Chemical Warfare (2008) - The Black Vault

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Medical</strong> <strong>Aspects</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Chemical</strong> <strong>Warfare</strong>AEF created the Second Army. By mid October 1918,chemical casualty management was becoming moreroutine. <strong>The</strong> Fourth Corps’ Field Hospital No. 34 (thetriage station) received 3,121 patients, including 935chemical casualties (30%), while it operated at thefront. Field Hospital No. 35 practiced routine chemicalcasualty management for all chemical casualtieswho had not been treated at the dressing stations.<strong>The</strong>se casualties were undressed by personnel wearingprotective ensembles. <strong>Chemical</strong> casualties’ eyes weretreated with a saturated solution <strong>of</strong> boric acid or a 1%solution <strong>of</strong> sodium bicarbonate, followed by liquidpetrolatum. Casualties were then transferred to roomswhere they were bathed first with soap and water andthen with a 2% solution <strong>of</strong> sodium bicarbonate. <strong>The</strong>ywere dried, warmed, given hot drinks, and taken to award. After receiving treatment, patients usually sleptfor 24 hours. 58In the Third Corps, two companies <strong>of</strong> the 1st GasRegiment were assigned in support <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>fensivechemical operations. <strong>Chemical</strong> casualties were to besent to the gas hospital at Souhesme le Grande. 59 <strong>The</strong>few chemical casualties from corps troops were sentto an improvised gas hospital at Rambluzin. 60 In the4th Division, one field hospital was located as far forwardas possible to receive, classify, and distribute allpatients from the front. A field hospital for the primarytreatment <strong>of</strong> chemical casualties and one that receivedslightly gassed and doubtful cases were nearby. <strong>The</strong>gas hospital was augmented with a mobile degassingunit. 39Experience on the eastern border <strong>of</strong> the ArgonneForest demonstrated the difficulty <strong>of</strong> carrying “antigas”medical equipment to the forwardly positionedbattalion aid stations, as well as the impracticality <strong>of</strong>administering antigas treatment to patients in theseexposed areas. <strong>The</strong> nearest point at which such treatmentcould be given effectively was the more rearwarddressing station. Even there, only the most acute managementcould be addressed. It was observed that, inmany cases, chemically contaminated clothing couldbe removed at a dressing station, thereby preparing thechemical casualty for “clean” evacuation to the fieldhospital, where more elaborate antigas equipment wasavailable. 45 <strong>The</strong> commanding <strong>of</strong>ficer <strong>of</strong> Field HospitalNo. 328 gave the following description <strong>of</strong> his establishmentat Apremont:<strong>The</strong> hospital in the forest 1 km southwest <strong>of</strong> Apremontwas situated back about 200 yards from the mainhighway and connected with it by an excellent road.It occupied nine wooden buildings, a large dugout,and an abandoned ward tent. All, in excellent condition,were wired for electricity and provided withmany modern conveniences. A complete laboratoryand dispensary were found intact. <strong>The</strong> immediatevicinity <strong>of</strong> the hospital was strewn with equipment,dead horses, and a few dead men. During the first 24hours 480 patients were admitted and evacuated.On October 13 Field Hospital 326 joined to act as a gashospital, operating under canvas. With the exception<strong>of</strong> a lull <strong>of</strong> three days, the two following weeks sawan endless procession <strong>of</strong> wounded. <strong>The</strong> great majority<strong>of</strong> these were only slightly wounded and able towalk, with the result that the two wards set apartfor these cases were exceptionally busy. <strong>The</strong> heaviestdays were October 15–18, when the admissionsand evacuations averaged one patient every one anda half minutes. 61(p34)Withdrawing German forces <strong>of</strong>ten used persistentagents to deny terrain and contaminate personnel andequipment. To handle the resulting casualties, fieldhospital personnel performing triage were given guidanceon how to establish a departmental “gas group.”It was suggested that the following personnel comprisea triage group that would work a 12-hour shift: twoMOs, two noncommissioned <strong>of</strong>ficers, two clerks, onestenographer, twelve litter bearers, two soldiers forkitchen detail, one ward attendant for each patienttent, and two soldiers for the dispensary and dressingroom (Figure 3-14). 62Fig. 3-14. This photograph from Gilchrist’s study <strong>of</strong> WorldWar I gas casualties has the following figure legend: “Warphotograph–An old ruin heavily contaminated with mustard.Warning sign on ruin; place guarded by troops toprevent entrance.” Often contaminated sites were not soclearly identified.Reproduced from: Gilchrist HL. A Comparative Study <strong>of</strong> WorldWar Casualties from Gas and Other Weapons. Edgewood Arsenal,Md: <strong>Chemical</strong> <strong>Warfare</strong> School; 1928: 26.96

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!