13.07.2015 Views

1985-1987 - Population Studies Center - University of Michigan

1985-1987 - Population Studies Center - University of Michigan

1985-1987 - Population Studies Center - University of Michigan

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

important role in the research productivity<strong>of</strong> the <strong>Center</strong>. While theseare too numerous to list, 1 do wantto note Lolagene Coombs, who formany years was my principal collaboratorboth in research on U.S.fertility and on Taiwan's population.What <strong>of</strong> the future <strong>of</strong>the <strong>Center</strong>?A note <strong>of</strong> optimism for the nearterm is justified by the fact that the<strong>Center</strong> is probably at a historicalhigh point in productivity, recognizedleadership in the field, and resources.I can make such a boldstatement without immodesty, sincethe achievements <strong>of</strong>the period from1972to <strong>1987</strong> have been made underthe leadership <strong>of</strong> Albert Hermalinand David Goldberg, following myretirement as Director. Since July<strong>1987</strong>, The <strong>Center</strong> has had anothercapable director, William Mason.The recognition <strong>of</strong> the status <strong>of</strong> the<strong>Center</strong> by its peers is evident in therenewal in1986 <strong>of</strong> its major institutionalsupport grant from theNational Institute for Child Healthand Human Development, a renewal<strong>of</strong> the grant from the HewlettFoundation, and the substantialfunding <strong>of</strong> peer-reviewed grants to•members <strong>of</strong> the PSC staff.It is an intrinsic part <strong>of</strong> a centerlike ours thatthe research andteachingstaff are under heavy timepressures, especially in view <strong>of</strong> thetime and energy needed for traveland field work. The future strength<strong>of</strong> the <strong>Center</strong> will depend on ourability to have enough highlyqualified personnel tomeet all <strong>of</strong> the<strong>Center</strong>'s obligations, especially forcontinuing interaction with studentsin residence.The basic principles and emphaseson which the <strong>Center</strong> wasfounded appear still tobe operatingand valid. We are likely tobe moreinvolved in cooperative work withcolleaguesat other institutionsathome and abroad, because thenetwork <strong>of</strong> people and the communicationsystems to make thispossible and the size <strong>of</strong> data setshave all been growing, in partthrough our efforts. Our owngrowing data archives are animportant resource for this growingworldwide network. The long-termfuture <strong>of</strong>the <strong>Center</strong>, as inthe past,depends on the quality <strong>of</strong> the staffand students, rather than on facilitiesand equipment. Resources willflow to excellent people working byhigh standards and with personalintegrity.The politics <strong>of</strong> population policyand frequent reports on populationmatters are day-to-day headlinesand media events that were definitelynot the case when the <strong>Center</strong>began. These engage our emotionsand may affect funding and dataaccess in some areas in the nearfuture. My guess is thatthesepossible short-run problems will notprevail in the long run, becausesocial policies, whether liberal orconservative, whether federal orlocal, inevitably involve demographicparameters. Inthe long runthe cumulative result <strong>of</strong> the dailyfacts <strong>of</strong> birth, death, and migrationwill outweigh short-run politicalnews and will demand attention inour world <strong>of</strong> growing interdependence,across ideological lines.— Ronald FreedmanNovember <strong>1987</strong>42 <strong>Population</strong> <strong>Studies</strong> <strong>Center</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!