13.07.2015 Views

historic context of maryland highway bridges built between 1948 ...

historic context of maryland highway bridges built between 1948 ...

historic context of maryland highway bridges built between 1948 ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

SECTIONSIXResults <strong>of</strong> Field InvestigationsCriterion D“Properties can be eligible for the National Register if they have yielded or are likely to yieldinformation important in prehistory or history.”Because this Criterion applies ordinarily to archeological resources, eligibility under thisCriterion was not evaluated as part <strong>of</strong> this study.The Historic Highway Bridges in Maryland: 1631 – 1960, Historic Context Report containsadditional criteria for common bridge types and technologies found in Maryland. The fieldworkand <strong>context</strong>ual research conducted by URS and Hardlines as part <strong>of</strong> the Historic HighwayBridges <strong>of</strong> the <strong>1948</strong>-1960 Period Project revealed that the following factors are particularlyimportant in evaluating postwar <strong>bridges</strong> in Maryland, and may be used to augment the abovementionedNational Register Criteria. These evaluation factors include:Association with statewide transportation planning efforts:- Private automotive clubs or local/county governments constructed many <strong>bridges</strong> inthe nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. As transportation planning matured bymid-century, postwar transportation planning projects were <strong>of</strong>ten initiated on the statelevel (following federal planning guidelines). This is indicative <strong>of</strong> new transportationlaws that took a more standardized approach to transportation planning.Association with large transportation infrastructure projects:Scale:- Many <strong>of</strong> these <strong>bridges</strong> may not be significant examples when evaluated individually.However, postwar transportation planning in Maryland was sometimes characterizedby larger projects that encompassed more than one bridge. It is important to evaluatethe thematic and design relationships <strong>between</strong> an individual bridge and any potentiallarger transportation project (which may include an evaluation <strong>of</strong> the larger resource).An individual bridge, while lacking individual significance, could be evaluated as acontributing resource within a larger district <strong>of</strong> related resources.- Bridges that display a larger scale should be more carefully evaluated. The postwarperiod <strong>of</strong> transportation planning in Maryland was frequently associated with thedesign and construction <strong>of</strong> wider, dualized roadway design. This effort later includedlimited access interstate <strong>highway</strong>s, which were preceded by the design <strong>of</strong> roadwaysthat were larger—and wider—and could better accommodate a higher rate <strong>of</strong> traveland a larger capacity.Safety improvements:- Many postwar <strong>bridges</strong> were designed to replace smaller, earlier structures. Roadwayimprovements in Maryland <strong>of</strong>ten demonstrate an increased sense <strong>of</strong> safety; tight,narrow, and dangerous curves associated with earlier roadways (intended for a slowerrate <strong>of</strong> speed) were <strong>of</strong>ten replaced in the postwar era. Postwar automotive travel (andtransportation design) was distinctly different than prewar travel—much <strong>of</strong> thisrelates to different life-safety features associated with a higher rate <strong>of</strong> speed.-\15-SEP-11\\ 7-4

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!