historic context of maryland highway bridges built between 1948 ...
historic context of maryland highway bridges built between 1948 ...
historic context of maryland highway bridges built between 1948 ...
- No tags were found...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
SECTIONSIXResults <strong>of</strong> Field Investigationsmid-twentieth century. The use <strong>of</strong> truss technology is increasingly rare in Maryland after WorldWar II and thus a truss bridge from this period would more likely be considered eligible for theNational Register under Criterion C than would a similar bridge from the pre-World War IIperiod. The MD 144 Bridge over the Monocacy River (Bridge 1003803) in Frederick County isNational Register-eligible under Criterion C on the state level, as it is one <strong>of</strong> only two deck truss<strong>highway</strong> <strong>bridges</strong> <strong>built</strong> in Maryland during the <strong>1948</strong>-1960 period, and is distinguished by itsarched Warren truss design.Metal truss <strong>bridges</strong> may also be considered eligible if they reflect a unique design or a significantdevelopment in the history <strong>of</strong> bridge engineering (Spero and Berger & Associates 1995: C-14).One such bridge is the I 895 Bridge (BC07800) over the CSX tracks in Baltimore County whichis National Register-eligible under Criterion C on the state level as the only <strong>highway</strong> bridgeusing a ―K‖ truss design <strong>built</strong> in Maryland.Historic research also can reveal the bridge‘s attribution to a particular designer, design firm, orgovernment entity. This is particularly true for <strong>bridges</strong> not prepared according to standardizedplans or that spanned particularly challenging waterways or land forms. In these cases, the StateRoads Commission usually contracted out the bridge design to a commercial engineering designfirm, such as the well-known J.E. Greiner firm <strong>of</strong> Baltimore. The Wise Avenue over Bear CreekBridge (B0079) in Baltimore is National Register-eligible under Criterion C, not only as a rareexample <strong>of</strong> a bascule bridge in Maryland, but also for its design association with the J.E. Greinerfirm.A bridge may be National Register-eligible if it is associated with designers who developedpatented or proprietary bridge features. These bridge types may be examples <strong>of</strong> rare or commontypes used on spans across the State <strong>of</strong> Maryland. The Kent Narrows Bridge (Bridge 1700600) inQueen Anne‘s County is National Register-eligible under Criterion C as it is one <strong>of</strong> only twomovable <strong>bridges</strong> in Maryland designed by the New York engineering firm <strong>of</strong> Hardesty &Hanover. Hardesty & Hanover and its predecessor firms were national leaders in thedevelopment <strong>of</strong> movable bridge technology from the late nineteenth century through the present.Carrying equal weight with a bridge‘s <strong>historic</strong>al (Criterion A or B) or engineering significance(Criterion C) is the bridge‘s integrity. Integrity is usually defined as the ability <strong>of</strong> a resource toconvey its <strong>historic</strong>al significance. Within the concept <strong>of</strong> integrity, the National Register Criteriarecognize seven aspects <strong>of</strong> integrity that in various degrees define integrity: location, design,workmanship, materials, setting, feeling, and association.In evaluating the aspects <strong>of</strong> integrity for a <strong>historic</strong> bridge, it is necessary to define those characterdefining elements <strong>of</strong> a bridge which are necessary components <strong>of</strong> its type. The most prominentfeature <strong>of</strong> a metal arch bridge is its bowstring arch, but additional elements include the approachspans, the substructure <strong>of</strong> piers and abutments, and the railing if any. Character-definingelements <strong>of</strong> a concrete beam bridge would include the superstructure <strong>of</strong> slab, beams, and parapet,and the substructure elements <strong>of</strong> abutments and piers. Alterations <strong>of</strong> these features detract fromthe integrity <strong>of</strong> the bridge as a whole and thus its National Register eligibility, while meresurface changes such as a redecking <strong>of</strong> a truss bridge would not.\15-SEP-11\\ 7-3