historic context of maryland highway bridges built between 1948 ...
historic context of maryland highway bridges built between 1948 ...
historic context of maryland highway bridges built between 1948 ...
- No tags were found...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
SECTIONSIXResults <strong>of</strong> Field InvestigationsFalls and Herrington Manor State Parks in the 1930s. Increased automobile traffic <strong>between</strong> US219 and the two state parks necessitated the building <strong>of</strong> the present Sang Run Road Bridge in1955.An example <strong>of</strong> a <strong>highway</strong> bridge in Maryland dating from the <strong>1948</strong>-1960 period eligible for theNational Register under Criterion A on the state level is the MD 213 Bridge over the Chesapeake& Delaware Canal (Bridge CE0100). The bridge is associated with the <strong>historic</strong>ally significantChesapeake & Delaware Canal and the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway <strong>of</strong> which the canal is nowa part. The canal, completed in 1829 and widened numerous times during the twentieth century,links the Delaware River and the Chesapeake Bay, and was <strong>built</strong> to provide a shortened inlandroute <strong>between</strong> Philadelphia and Baltimore. The MD 213 Bridge, completed in 1949, is associatedwith the canal‘s period <strong>of</strong> ownership (1919-present) by the US Army Corps <strong>of</strong> Engineers, whichmaintains and operates the canal and the several <strong>bridges</strong> that cross over it in both Delaware andMaryland. The present MD 213 Bridge was <strong>built</strong> to replace an earlier mechanical lift bridge also<strong>built</strong> by the USACE and destroyed following a 1942 freighter collision.Criterion B“Properties can be eligible for the National Register if they are associated with the lives <strong>of</strong>persons significant in our past.”A bridge may be eligible for the National Register under Criterion B if it is associated withindividuals or groups important to the history <strong>of</strong> a Maryland community, region, the State <strong>of</strong>Maryland or the nation (Spero and Berger & Associates 1995: C-5). A bridge may also beeligible if it can be associated with persons <strong>of</strong> local, state, or national importance if they areassociated with political, economic, military or social <strong>historic</strong>al events. Evaluating a singlestructure, such as a bridge, for the National Register under Criterion B involves conductingintensive research on the bridge‘s construction history, and its association with prominentindividuals. A bridge may be considered eligible for the National Register under Criterion B forits association with individual engineers, architects and builders or like commercial firms <strong>of</strong>local, state or national importance. However, because this association is almost always in the<strong>context</strong> <strong>of</strong> the individual‘s capacity as a designer, Criterion C (see below) is usually moreapplicable. For this reason, application <strong>of</strong> Criterion B in evaluating the eligibility <strong>of</strong> an individualbridge for listing in the National Register is rare.Criterion C“Properties can be eligible for the National Register if they embody the distinctivecharacteristics <strong>of</strong> a type, period, or method <strong>of</strong> construction, or that represent the work <strong>of</strong> amaster, or that possess high artistic value, or that represent a significant and distinguishableentity whose components may lack individual distinction.”Evaluating a single structure, such as a bridge, for the National Register under Criterion Cinvolves conducting intensive research on the bridge‘s construction history and its associationwith prominent bridge designers or design/engineering companies. Research should establishboth the rarity and importance <strong>of</strong> the bridge type during the study period. For example, metaltruss <strong>highway</strong> <strong>bridges</strong> are associated with the adoption <strong>of</strong> uniform engineering standards and theuse <strong>of</strong> simplified, functional (primarily Warren and Pratt type truss) designs during the early and\15-SEP-11\\ 7-2