nrega - of Planning Commission

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Table 5.8 : District wise Distribution of Loan Position of theBeneficiaryS. No Districts Outstanding LoanYes No TotalNorthern Region1 Barabanki 7 293 3002 Sonbhadra 300 3003 Sirsa - 300 3004 Karauli 18 279 297Sub-Total 25 1172 1197Eastern Region5 Munger 2 298 3006 Kishenganj 25 275 3007 Sambalpur 0 300 3008 Sundergarh 23 277 3009 Gumla 19 281 30010 Ranchi 5 295 30011 Malda 20 280 300Sub-Total 94 2006 2100Western Region12 Dahod 192 108 30013 Jhabua 212 88 30014 Bhandara 189 111 30015 Bilaspur 198 102 300Sub-Total 791 409 1200Southern Region16 Devangere 93 207 30017 Medak 176 124 30018 Palakkad 86 214 300Sub-Total 355 545 900North-East Region19 North Lakhimpur 13 287 30020 South Garo Hills 3 297 300Total 16 584 600Grand Total 1281 4716 5997Source : IAMR Survey, 2007
Table 5.9 : District wise Distribution of Assets Created by the Respondents Before & After Joining the SchemeS.DistrictNoBeforeAfterBicycle Radio Sewing Electric Fan Steel Others Bicycle Radio Sewing Electric Fan Steel OthersMachine Fitting Trunk Machine Fitting TrunkNorthernRegion1 Barabanki 249 126 0 2 3 103 0 19 64 0 0 2 40 292 Sonbhadra 185 78 6 0 0 254 0 2 7 0 0 0 5 03 Sirsa 60 30 60 180 90 60 0 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA4 Karauli 203 204 72 0 10 42 0 13 10 0 0 0 0 0Sub-Total 697 438 138 182 103 459 0 34 81 0 0 2 45 29EasternRegion5 Munger 101 25 1 1 3 10 0 37 12 0 0 0 0 06 Kishenganj 132 118 0 0 0 0 0 14 2 0 0 0 0 07 Sambalpur NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA8 Sundergarh 212 208 15 3 4 31 0 0 14 0 0 0 10 09 Gumla 106 50 2 2 2 29 0 21 28 4 8 10 21 010 Ranchi 162 48 0 0 13 103 0 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA11 Malda 118 13 0 1 1 36 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1Sub-Total 831 462 18 19 23 209 0 72 56 4 8 10 32 1WesternRegion12 Dahod 235 105 31 79 67 52 0 12 42 12 0 0 14 013 Jhabua 88 27 3 87 52 91 21 3 0 0 0 2 5 614 Bhandara 240 180 0 0 0 0 0 10 10 0 0 0 0 015 Bilaspur 208 64 5 92 79 154 13 4 1 0 0 1 58 1Sub-Total 771 376 39 258 198 297 34 38 53 12 0 3 77 7SouthernRegion16 Devangere 60 90 9 30 50 50 30 6 6 0 1 8 8 917 Medak 41 60 14 61 70 4 0 29 14 7 17 7 1 018 Palakkad 41 166 8 16 44 30 4 3 19 4 6 13 14 1Sub-Total 142 316 31 107 164 84 34 38 39 11 24 28 23 10North-EastRegion19NorthLakhimpur 228 83 4 14 15 163 47 20 36 3 5 1 14 3020South GaroHills 79 152 2 69 119 192 50 0 13 1 5 1 5 0Sub-Total 307 235 6 83 134 355 97 20 49 4 10 2 19 30GrandTotal 2748 1827 232 649 622 1404 165 202 278 31 42 45 196 77Source : IAMR Survey, 2007
Page 5 and 6:
One of the significant objectives o
Page 7 and 8:
output, there are many issues which
Page 9 and 10:
office. Thus in every district 300
Page 11 and 12:
Eighty five percent of respondents
Page 13:
Ten percent of the respondents opin
Page 16 and 17: The scheme was implemented in a gig
Page 18 and 19: egistration procedures, and job car
Page 20 and 21: NREGS is the most significant schem
Page 22 and 23: An attempt is also made to measure
Page 24 and 25: illustration of tables, it was desc
Page 26 and 27: Zone State District Person-daysgene
Page 28 and 29: Household DetailsTable-1.1: Distric
Page 30 and 31: 2. Mechanism of Job Card Registrati
Page 32 and 33: Table 2.3 : District wise showing t
Page 34 and 35: Table 2.5 : District wise distribut
Page 36 and 37: Table 2.7 : District wise Distribut
Page 38 and 39: 3. Issue of Job CardTable 3.1 : Dis
Page 47 and 48: Table 4.4 District wise Distributio
Page 53 and 54: Table 4.10 : District wise Distribu
Page 59 and 60: 5. Quality of LifeTable 5.1 : Distr
Page 63 and 64: Table5.5: District wise Distributio
Page 65: Table 5.7 District Wise Distributio
Page 73 and 74: Table 6.4 : District Wise Distribut
Page 75 and 76: Annexure - IIIGuidelines issued to
show all

nrega - of Planning Commission

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?