nrega - of Planning Commission
nrega - of Planning Commission nrega - of Planning Commission
Table 2.5 : District wise distribution of response of Beneficiary regarding thediscussionin Gram Sabha about the request of Application which were Rejected earlierS.No Districts Application which were Rejected earlierYes No No Response TotalNorthern Region1 Barabanki 55 245 0 3002 Sonbhadra 300 0 0 3003 Sirsa 298 0 2 3004 Karauli 0 297 0 297Sub-Total 653 542 2 1197Eastern Region5 Munger 25 275 0 3006 Kishenganj 8 292 0 3007 Sambalpur 100 200 0 3008 Sundergarh 0 300 0 3009 Gumla 232 68 0 30010 Ranchi 204 96 0 30011 Malda 47 253 0 300Sub-Total 616 1484 0 2100Western Region12 Dahod 252 36 12 30013 Jhabua 237 48 15 30014 Bhandara 248 43 9 300Sub-Total 737 127 36 900Southern Region15 Bilaspur 0 300 0 30016 Devangere 80 208 12 30017 Medak 140 160 0 30018 Palakkad 26 274 0 300Sub-Total 246 942 12 1200North-East Region19 North Lakhimpur 0 300 0 30020 South Garo Hills 197 103 0 300Sub-Total 197 403 0 600Grand Total 2449 3498 50 5997Source : IAMR Survey, 2007
Table 2.6 : District wise Distribution of response of Beneficiaries regarding theFreequencyin which the Gram Sabha Meetings are ConductedS.No Districts Freequency of Grama Sabha MeetingMonthly Biomonthly Quarterly Others* TotalNorthern Region1 Barabanki 110 0 190 0 3002 Sonbhadra 104 144 52 0 3003 Sirsa 0 0 300 0 3004 Karauli 41 77 116 63 297Sub-Total 255 221 658 63 1197Eastern Region5 Munger 11 0 289 0 3006 Kishenganj 20 0 280 0 3007 Sambalpur 57 67 83 93 3008 Sundergarh 25 35 240 0 3009 Gumla 131 0 109 60 30010 Ranchi 197 80 23 0 30011 Malda 73 13 214 0 300Sub-Total 514 195 1238 153 2100Western Region12 Dahod 140 160 0 0 30013 Jhabua 281 17 2 0 30014 Bhandara 300 0 0 0 30015 Bilaspur 0 0 300 0 300Sub-Total 721 177 302 0 1200Southern Region16 Devangere 103 21 85 91 30017 Medak 8 5 3 284 30018 Palakkad 0 0 250 50 300Sub-Total 111 26 338 425 900North-East Region19 North Lakhimpur 33 0 222 45 30020 South Garo Hills 250 0 50 0 300Sub-Total 283 0 272 45 600Grand Total 1884 619 2808 686 5997Note : *Half yearly or yearlySource : IAMR Survey, 2007
- Page 5 and 6: One of the significant objectives o
- Page 7 and 8: output, there are many issues which
- Page 9 and 10: office. Thus in every district 300
- Page 11 and 12: Eighty five percent of respondents
- Page 13: Ten percent of the respondents opin
- Page 16 and 17: The scheme was implemented in a gig
- Page 18 and 19: egistration procedures, and job car
- Page 20 and 21: NREGS is the most significant schem
- Page 22 and 23: An attempt is also made to measure
- Page 24 and 25: illustration of tables, it was desc
- Page 26 and 27: Zone State District Person-daysgene
- Page 28 and 29: Household DetailsTable-1.1: Distric
- Page 30 and 31: 2. Mechanism of Job Card Registrati
- Page 32 and 33: Table 2.3 : District wise showing t
- Page 36 and 37: Table 2.7 : District wise Distribut
- Page 38 and 39: 3. Issue of Job CardTable 3.1 : Dis
- Page 40 and 41: Table 3.3 : District wise Distribut
- Page 42 and 43: Table 3.5 : District wise Distribut
- Page 47 and 48: Table 4.4 District wise Distributio
- Page 49 and 50: Table 4.6 : District wise Distribut
- Page 51 and 52: Table 4.8 : District wise Distribut
- Page 53 and 54: Table 4.10 : District wise Distribu
- Page 55 and 56: Table 4.12 : District wise Distribu
- Page 57 and 58: Table 4.14 : District wise Distribu
- Page 59 and 60: 5. Quality of LifeTable 5.1 : Distr
- Page 61 and 62: Table 5.3 : District wise Distribut
- Page 63 and 64: Table5.5: District wise Distributio
- Page 65 and 66: Table 5.7 District Wise Distributio
- Page 67 and 68: Table 5.9 : District wise Distribut
- Page 69 and 70: Table 5.11 : District wise Distribu
- Page 71 and 72: Table 6.2 : District wise Distribut
- Page 73 and 74: Table 6.4 : District Wise Distribut
- Page 75 and 76: Annexure - IIIGuidelines issued to
Table 2.5 : District wise distribution <strong>of</strong> response <strong>of</strong> Beneficiary regarding thediscussionin Gram Sabha about the request <strong>of</strong> Application which were Rejected earlierS.No Districts Application which were Rejected earlierYes No No Response TotalNorthern Region1 Barabanki 55 245 0 3002 Sonbhadra 300 0 0 3003 Sirsa 298 0 2 3004 Karauli 0 297 0 297Sub-Total 653 542 2 1197Eastern Region5 Munger 25 275 0 3006 Kishenganj 8 292 0 3007 Sambalpur 100 200 0 3008 Sundergarh 0 300 0 3009 Gumla 232 68 0 30010 Ranchi 204 96 0 30011 Malda 47 253 0 300Sub-Total 616 1484 0 2100Western Region12 Dahod 252 36 12 30013 Jhabua 237 48 15 30014 Bhandara 248 43 9 300Sub-Total 737 127 36 900Southern Region15 Bilaspur 0 300 0 30016 Devangere 80 208 12 30017 Medak 140 160 0 30018 Palakkad 26 274 0 300Sub-Total 246 942 12 1200North-East Region19 North Lakhimpur 0 300 0 30020 South Garo Hills 197 103 0 300Sub-Total 197 403 0 600Grand Total 2449 3498 50 5997Source : IAMR Survey, 2007
Change language