nrega - of Planning Commission
nrega - of Planning Commission nrega - of Planning Commission
Household DetailsTable-1.1: District wise Distribution of Head of the Household by Sex and Social GroupS.No. Districts Social GroupSC ST OBC General TotalMale Female Male Female Male Female Male Female Male FemaleNorthern Region1 Barabanki 169 0 0 0 106 1 23 1 298 22 Sonbhadra 60 8 120 50 53 8 1 0 234 663 Sirsa 100 74 0 0 77 6 30 13 207 934 Karauli 51 46 40 40 51 46 16 7 158 139Sub-Total 380 128 160 90 287 61 70 21 897 300Eastern Region5 Munger 103 5 32 4 121 4 31 0 287 136 Kishenganj 34 1 28 2 33 3 188 11 283 177 Sambalpur 37 10 129 51 41 8 24 0 231 698 Sundergarh 13 10 126 108 15 13 8 7 162 1389 Gumla 2 0 241 34 9 3 9 2 261 3910 Ranchi 13 5 211 39 12 14 4 2 240 6011 Malda 89 4 151 28 22 0 6 0 268 32Sub-Total 291 35 918 266 253 45 270 22 1732 368Western Region12 Dahod 1 9 201 18 0 0 69 2 271 2913 Jhabua 0 0 158 142 0 0 0 0 158 14214 Bhandara 40 8 0 6 183 27 31 5 254 4615 Bilaspur 16 5 223 15 25 3 13 0 277 23Sub-Total 57 22 582 181 208 30 113 7 960 240SouthernRegion16 Devangere 68 29 35 24 28 15 81 20 212 8817 Medak 79 66 2 0 42 84 20 7 143 15718 Palakkad 14 66 30 40 22 93 14 21 80 220Sub-Total 161 161 67 64 92 192 115 48 435 465North-EastRegion19 North Lakhimpur 19 2 88 0 91 6 94 0 292 820 South Garo Hills 1 1 232 61 0 2 2 1 235 65Sub-Total 20 3 320 61 91 8 96 1 527 73Grand Total 909 349 2047 662 931 336 664 98 4551 1446Note: SC - Scheduled CasteST - Scheduled TribeOBC - Other Backword ClassSource : IAMR Survey, 2007.
Table1.2: District wise Distribution of Potential NREGS Workers in each HouseholdS.No. Districts Size of the household (Potential worker)4----67----10 Total1-----3Northern Region1 Barabanki 299 1 0 3002 Sonbhadra 293 7 0 3003 Sirsa 260 38 2 3004 Karauli 261 36 0 297Sub-Total 1113 82 2 1197Eastern Region5 Munger 67 190 43 3006 Kishenganj 58 171 71 3007 Sambalpur 188 106 6 3008 Sundergarh 231 66 3 3009 Gumla 282 18 0 30010 Ranchi 270 30 0 30011 Malda 280 18 2 300Sub-Total 1376 599 125 2100Western Region12 Dahod 167 121 12 30013 Jhabua 129 167 4 30014 Bhandara 90 180 30 30015 Bilaspur 177 110 13 300Sub-Total 563 578 59 1200Southem Region16 Devangere 187 109 4 30017 Medak 270 15 15 30018 Palakkad 285 14 1 300Sub-Total 742 138 20 900North-East Region19 North Lakhimpur 296 4 0 30020 South Garo Hills 270 30 0 300SubTotal 566 34 0 600Grand Total 4360 1431 206 5997Source : IAMR Survey, 2007
- Page 5 and 6: One of the significant objectives o
- Page 7 and 8: output, there are many issues which
- Page 9 and 10: office. Thus in every district 300
- Page 11 and 12: Eighty five percent of respondents
- Page 13: Ten percent of the respondents opin
- Page 16 and 17: The scheme was implemented in a gig
- Page 18 and 19: egistration procedures, and job car
- Page 20 and 21: NREGS is the most significant schem
- Page 22 and 23: An attempt is also made to measure
- Page 24 and 25: illustration of tables, it was desc
- Page 26 and 27: Zone State District Person-daysgene
- Page 30 and 31: 2. Mechanism of Job Card Registrati
- Page 32 and 33: Table 2.3 : District wise showing t
- Page 34 and 35: Table 2.5 : District wise distribut
- Page 36 and 37: Table 2.7 : District wise Distribut
- Page 38 and 39: 3. Issue of Job CardTable 3.1 : Dis
- Page 40 and 41: Table 3.3 : District wise Distribut
- Page 42 and 43: Table 3.5 : District wise Distribut
- Page 47 and 48: Table 4.4 District wise Distributio
- Page 49 and 50: Table 4.6 : District wise Distribut
- Page 51 and 52: Table 4.8 : District wise Distribut
- Page 53 and 54: Table 4.10 : District wise Distribu
- Page 55 and 56: Table 4.12 : District wise Distribu
- Page 57 and 58: Table 4.14 : District wise Distribu
- Page 59 and 60: 5. Quality of LifeTable 5.1 : Distr
- Page 61 and 62: Table 5.3 : District wise Distribut
- Page 63 and 64: Table5.5: District wise Distributio
- Page 65 and 66: Table 5.7 District Wise Distributio
- Page 67 and 68: Table 5.9 : District wise Distribut
- Page 69 and 70: Table 5.11 : District wise Distribu
- Page 71 and 72: Table 6.2 : District wise Distribut
- Page 73 and 74: Table 6.4 : District Wise Distribut
- Page 75 and 76: Annexure - IIIGuidelines issued to
Table1.2: District wise Distribution <strong>of</strong> Potential NREGS Workers in each HouseholdS.No. Districts Size <strong>of</strong> the household (Potential worker)4----67----10 Total1-----3Northern Region1 Barabanki 299 1 0 3002 Sonbhadra 293 7 0 3003 Sirsa 260 38 2 3004 Karauli 261 36 0 297Sub-Total 1113 82 2 1197Eastern Region5 Munger 67 190 43 3006 Kishenganj 58 171 71 3007 Sambalpur 188 106 6 3008 Sundergarh 231 66 3 3009 Gumla 282 18 0 30010 Ranchi 270 30 0 30011 Malda 280 18 2 300Sub-Total 1376 599 125 2100Western Region12 Dahod 167 121 12 30013 Jhabua 129 167 4 30014 Bhandara 90 180 30 30015 Bilaspur 177 110 13 300Sub-Total 563 578 59 1200Southem Region16 Devangere 187 109 4 30017 Medak 270 15 15 30018 Palakkad 285 14 1 300Sub-Total 742 138 20 900North-East Region19 North Lakhimpur 296 4 0 30020 South Garo Hills 270 30 0 300SubTotal 566 34 0 600Grand Total 4360 1431 206 5997Source : IAMR Survey, 2007
Change language