uxu****** p1 u*u Gr**x1Re**xReB x u* * *BPr x x* (5.14)(5.15)In <strong>the</strong> reduced-scale model, <strong>the</strong> fluid used is air so <strong>the</strong> Prandtl number rema<strong>in</strong>s <strong>the</strong> same as <strong>for</strong><strong>the</strong> prototype build<strong>in</strong>g. This leaves <strong>the</strong> Reynolds number and Grash<strong>of</strong> number to be calculated.Several papers have addressed <strong>the</strong> question <strong>of</strong> which <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se parameters is more important tomatch <strong>in</strong> reduced-scale models (Awbi and Nemri, 1990, Rolloos, 1977, Awbi, 2003). They haveconcluded that if <strong>the</strong> Reynolds number <strong>for</strong> both <strong>the</strong> prototype and model falls with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>turbulent region, i.e. Re>2.3x10 3 , <strong>the</strong>n <strong>the</strong> Grash<strong>of</strong> number is <strong>the</strong> key parameter to match.Hagstrom (2002) cites a critical Rayleigh (Ra=PrxGr) number <strong>of</strong> 2x10 7 when natural convection<strong>of</strong> a plume is modeled under (mechanical) ventilation conditions, result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> turbulentconvection flows.5.3 Similarity RequirementsThere are specific similarity conditions that are required <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> results from <strong>the</strong> scaled model tobe transferable to <strong>the</strong> full-scale prototype. To validate <strong>the</strong> model <strong>for</strong> application <strong>in</strong> build<strong>in</strong>gs,<strong>the</strong>re must be similarity <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> velocity distribution, airflow patterns, and temperaturedistributions between <strong>the</strong> prototype build<strong>in</strong>g and <strong>the</strong> model. The three ma<strong>in</strong> criteria required <strong>for</strong>similarity between a reduced-scale model and prototype are geometric, k<strong>in</strong>ematic or dynamic,and <strong>the</strong>rmal similarity.5.3.1 Geometric SimilarityGeometric similarity is one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> basic criteria used to obta<strong>in</strong> similarity between a prototype andscaled model. Geometric similarity is also <strong>the</strong> easiest <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se criteria to meet by simply scal<strong>in</strong>gdown <strong>the</strong> l<strong>in</strong>ear dimensions <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> full-scale build<strong>in</strong>g. This must be done at least <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> depth(distance from <strong>the</strong> exterior wall to <strong>the</strong> atrium to <strong>the</strong> exterior wall) and height <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> model, whileprovid<strong>in</strong>g some amount <strong>of</strong> width to prevent constriction <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> airflow s<strong>in</strong>ce natural ventilation <strong>in</strong>build<strong>in</strong>gs is not a two-dimensional problem. This scal<strong>in</strong>g must ensure that <strong>the</strong> l<strong>in</strong>ear dimensions<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> prototype are reduced proportionately <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> three dimensions, x, y, and z. The l<strong>in</strong>eardimensions must use <strong>the</strong> same scal<strong>in</strong>g factor <strong>in</strong> all three directions <strong>in</strong> order to meet this criterion.This perta<strong>in</strong>s to all surfaces and open<strong>in</strong>gs with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> model, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g walls, floors, andw<strong>in</strong>dows. The depth <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> space can affect <strong>the</strong> airflow patterns and ability <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> air to mixwith<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> occupied zone; this variable is important, as naturally ventilated build<strong>in</strong>gs are <strong>of</strong>tendesigned us<strong>in</strong>g a guidel<strong>in</strong>e <strong>for</strong> determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> maximum depth and ratio <strong>of</strong> depth to floor-toceil<strong>in</strong>gheight that will still allow <strong>for</strong> adequate penetration <strong>of</strong> outdoor air <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> space. Lack <strong>of</strong>geometric similarity can <strong>in</strong>fluence <strong>the</strong> flow patterns and temperature distribution with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> spaceunder analysis. In natural ventilation, <strong>the</strong> ratio <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> depth <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> space to <strong>the</strong> height <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>space <strong>of</strong>ten limits <strong>the</strong> effectiveness with which air can be <strong>in</strong>troduced <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> space. The ratio <strong>of</strong>height <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> space, H, to <strong>the</strong> depth <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> space, X, should rema<strong>in</strong> equal <strong>for</strong> geometric similarityto exist. This is represented <strong>in</strong> equation 5.1, where <strong>the</strong> subscript M <strong>in</strong>dicates <strong>the</strong> model values,and P <strong>the</strong> prototype.86
X HM X HP(5.16)5.3.2 K<strong>in</strong>ematic SimilarityFor k<strong>in</strong>ematic similarity, <strong>the</strong> ratios <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> fluid velocities and accelerations must be equal. Thiswill ensure that <strong>the</strong> streaml<strong>in</strong>es and flow patterns will be similar. This requirement is tiedclosely to <strong>the</strong> dynamic similarity which necessitates that <strong>the</strong> ratio <strong>of</strong> all <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>for</strong>ces that causemotion <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> operat<strong>in</strong>g fluid be equal between <strong>the</strong> model and prototype. From similarity <strong>the</strong>ory,a scale model will replicate <strong>the</strong> k<strong>in</strong>ematic boundary conditions <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> prototype if <strong>the</strong> Prandtl,Reynolds, and Archimedes numbers are identical <strong>for</strong> both cases.The Reynolds number, Re, is <strong>the</strong> dimensionless ratio between <strong>in</strong>ertial and viscous <strong>for</strong>ces, used <strong>in</strong>dynamic similarity <strong>for</strong> evaluat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> magnitude <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se <strong>for</strong>ces.ULRe (5.17)With a low Reynolds number, flow rate has a strong dependence on <strong>the</strong> viscosity, whereas with ahigh Reynolds number <strong>the</strong> viscous <strong>for</strong>ces can <strong>of</strong>ten be neglected. To meet similarityrequirements:Re (5.18)MRe P UL UL (5.19) M PWhen air is used and <strong>the</strong> density <strong>of</strong> air between <strong>the</strong> model and prototype does not varysubstantially, equation 5.19 can be simplified to:UL M UL P(5.20)The Prandtl number describes <strong>the</strong> ratio <strong>of</strong> molecular momentum to <strong>the</strong>rmal diffusivity. Whenevaluat<strong>in</strong>g k<strong>in</strong>ematic similarity <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> case <strong>of</strong> build<strong>in</strong>gs, if air is used as <strong>the</strong> fluid <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> model,<strong>the</strong> Prandlt number is <strong>the</strong>n matched at 0.71. This assumes that <strong>the</strong> operat<strong>in</strong>g temperatures <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong>build<strong>in</strong>g and model fall between 0°C and 100°C. For a Prandtl number less than one, <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>rmaldiffusivity or speed <strong>of</strong> heat propagation is larger than <strong>the</strong> momentum diffusivity. If a fluid o<strong>the</strong>rthan air is used, <strong>the</strong> Prandtl number must be evaluated and compared to <strong>the</strong> prototype value. cPr P(5.21)kF<strong>in</strong>ally, <strong>the</strong> Archimedes number, or <strong>the</strong> measure <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> relative magnitude <strong>of</strong> buoyancy <strong>for</strong>ces to<strong>in</strong>ertial <strong>for</strong>ces act<strong>in</strong>g on a fluid, is used to evaluate <strong>the</strong> motion <strong>of</strong> fluid due to density differences.For ventilation purposes, it provides <strong>the</strong> ratio <strong>of</strong> pressure difference associated with buoyancydriven flow to <strong>the</strong> pressure difference associated with w<strong>in</strong>d driven flow. Recall<strong>in</strong>g equation 2.7<strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> pressure difference due to buoyancy, and equation 2.9 <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> pressure difference due tow<strong>in</strong>d, <strong>the</strong> ratio <strong>of</strong> buoyancy <strong>for</strong>ce to <strong>in</strong>ertial, or w<strong>in</strong>d <strong>for</strong>ce is:PBgHTgHT (5.22)22PUUWFor similar w<strong>in</strong>d pressure differences, Δp w can be simplified to U 2 . The dimensionless ratio <strong>the</strong>nbecomes <strong>the</strong> Archimedes number, Ar:87
- Page 2 and 3:
Thesis Committee:Leon R. Glicksman,
- Page 4 and 5:
Table of ContentsTable of Contents
- Page 6 and 7:
7.1.3 Full Model Case .............
- Page 8 and 9:
Figure 41. Wind Direction Data for
- Page 10 and 11:
List of TablesTable 1. Energy End U
- Page 12 and 13:
Table 64. Comparison of Dimensionle
- Page 15 and 16:
Chapter 1.0IntroductionEnergy consu
- Page 17 and 18:
insulated building envelopes with t
- Page 19 and 20:
energy usage and efficient design.
- Page 21 and 22:
Figure 3. European Patent Office Bu
- Page 23:
selecting boundary conditions) to e
- Page 26 and 27:
2.2.1 Buoyancy-Driven VentilationVe
- Page 28 and 29:
Figure 7. Neutral Pressure Level fo
- Page 30 and 31:
Combined wind-buoyancy flow is more
- Page 32 and 33:
design. The depth of natural ventil
- Page 34 and 35:
of cooling required by 30 percent o
- Page 36 and 37: considered when determining how the
- Page 38 and 39: environmental conditions are examin
- Page 40 and 41: As natural ventilation is prevalent
- Page 43 and 44: Chapter 3.0Evaluation of Prototype
- Page 45 and 46: Figure 12. Interior Atrium ViewFigu
- Page 47 and 48: Table 8. Prototype Building Window
- Page 49 and 50: Figure 15. HOBO® H8 Series Tempera
- Page 51 and 52: Finally, airflow visualization was
- Page 53 and 54: only is the airflow almost never at
- Page 55 and 56: Table 10. Window Bag Device Measure
- Page 57 and 58: Mon 7-21Tue 7-22Wed 7-23Thu 7-24Fri
- Page 59 and 60: 12:00 AM1:00 AM2:00 AM3:00 AM4:00 A
- Page 61 and 62: 27-Jul27-Jul28-Jul28-Jul29-Jul30-Ju
- Page 63 and 64: A range of air exchange rates was f
- Page 65 and 66: the windows on the second floor, or
- Page 67 and 68: Total Electric (kWh/m2)Total Gas (k
- Page 69 and 70: movement, Houghton Hall has much le
- Page 71 and 72: Chapter 4.0Modeling and Visualizati
- Page 73 and 74: for future design of similar type b
- Page 75 and 76: lower and upper openings and natura
- Page 77 and 78: the acceptable diffusion rate, or
- Page 79 and 80: applications involving full-scale b
- Page 81 and 82: digital camera with both manually o
- Page 83 and 84: Chapter 5.0Dimensional Analysis and
- Page 85: u oHgHT2uocu Hpo1Re Ar1Re Pr(5.7)(5
- Page 89 and 90: Radiation was found to have an impa
- Page 91: height is used for the full-scale b
- Page 94 and 95: 6.3 Model Descriptions6.3.1 Physica
- Page 96 and 97: Figure 30. Floor Plan of the Protot
- Page 98 and 99: Figure 31. North Facade of Model wi
- Page 100 and 101: Monitoring data collected from the
- Page 102 and 103: By default, there was no accounting
- Page 104 and 105: 40-location card inserted into the
- Page 106 and 107: 6.5 ExperimentsTo evaluate the mode
- Page 108 and 109: modified to determine the impact of
- Page 110 and 111: Figure 39. Two Heated Zone ModelWit
- Page 112 and 113: minute interval, the model was assu
- Page 114 and 115: Figure 42. Cross-Section of Wind-Ge
- Page 116 and 117: Table 25. Wind-Assisted Ventilation
- Page 118 and 119: Figure 44. Heaters and Zones for a)
- Page 120 and 121: Height from Floor (m)Height from Fl
- Page 122 and 123: Where V is the outlet velocity, A o
- Page 124 and 125: Table 32. Conduction Heat Loss for
- Page 126 and 127: a) Air Modelb) Water ModelFigure 50
- Page 128 and 129: Height from Floor (m)The temperatur
- Page 130 and 131: Height from Floor (m)In the atrium
- Page 132 and 133: First NorthUpper Window 0.17 m/s -0
- Page 134 and 135: Height from Floor (m)the column at
- Page 136 and 137:
Height from Floor (m)Height from Fl
- Page 138 and 139:
Height from Floor (m)3.53.02.52.01.
- Page 140 and 141:
was less than 12 percent. These val
- Page 142 and 143:
Table 39. Variation of Outlet Wind
- Page 144 and 145:
temperature of the air was the same
- Page 146 and 147:
3.532.521.55m/s4m/s3m/s2m/s1m/s1.5m
- Page 148 and 149:
3.532.521.55m/s4m/s3m/s2m/s1m/s1.5m
- Page 150 and 151:
The average and exhaust internal bu
- Page 152 and 153:
Table 43. Calculated Wind and Buoya
- Page 154 and 155:
In the last two lines, for both the
- Page 156 and 157:
Figure 80. CFD Simulation of the Te
- Page 158 and 159:
uoyancy case the air from the groun
- Page 160 and 161:
160
- Page 162 and 163:
windows of naturally ventilated bui
- Page 164 and 165:
difficult to select the boundary co
- Page 166 and 167:
simulations are able to do would al
- Page 168 and 169:
Bordass, W.T., A.K.R. Bromley and A
- Page 170 and 171:
Linddament, M. 1996. Why CO2? Air I
- Page 172 and 173:
172
- Page 174 and 175:
MODEL: K20-8SERIAL: 10047RECORDER_I
- Page 176 and 177:
2 Boiler-3 50.00 C1 N1 1.0 ON ON OF
- Page 178 and 179:
|PW|DESCRIP |KW |KWH|KVA|KVH|------
- Page 180 and 181:
2:5 ;day_ofYr17:P30 ;EOT = 0.000075
- Page 182 and 183:
2:3136:P30 ;DUM2 = -0.040891:-4.089
- Page 184 and 185:
;7:21 ;input location;8:0 ;mulptipl
- Page 186 and 187:
;79:P22 ;EXC w/DELAY (only for dela
- Page 188 and 189:
1:45 ;port5 (homeSense)2:31 ;exit l
- Page 190 and 191:
13:P95 ;ENDIF14:P95 ;ENDIF15:P3 ;pu
- Page 192 and 193:
2:20 ;RH30:P70 ;sample1:12:20 ;RH31
- Page 194 and 195:
194
- Page 196 and 197:
Five Windows Open: Upper versus Low
- Page 198 and 199:
One Window Open: Upper versus Lower
- Page 200 and 201:
25 cm / 3 m 24.33 26.62 22.68 22.93
- Page 202 and 203:
25 cm / 3 m 24.07 25.26 22.65 22.78
- Page 204 and 205:
Two Stacks Open Temperature Stratif
- Page 206 and 207:
Stacks Closed Temperature Stratific
- Page 208 and 209:
2.3 24.31 24.65 24.781.4 23.35 23.6
- Page 210 and 211:
0.6 20.56 20.67 20.94 21.22 21.41 2