For airflow visualization, <strong>the</strong> particles must be highly reflective so that <strong>the</strong>y are able to becaptured on film <strong>for</strong> analysis. In general, <strong>for</strong> smoke and fog generat<strong>in</strong>g mach<strong>in</strong>es, <strong>the</strong> particlesize is approximately 0.5μm (Smits and Lim 2000). The work<strong>in</strong>g fluid used to <strong>in</strong>troduce <strong>the</strong>material <strong>for</strong> flow visualization should also be neutrally buoyant. For air, this requires that <strong>the</strong>material <strong>in</strong>troduced be at <strong>the</strong> same temperature as <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>let air <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> model. First orderapproximation <strong>of</strong> buoyancy effects due to particle size becomes negligible when <strong>the</strong> diameter isless than 1μm, and visibility <strong>of</strong> particles is possible when <strong>the</strong> particles are larger than 0.15μm(Merzkirch 1987). A system comprised <strong>of</strong> several outlets is <strong>of</strong>ten used <strong>in</strong> w<strong>in</strong>d tunnels,provid<strong>in</strong>g a series <strong>of</strong> equally spaced l<strong>in</strong>es <strong>of</strong> smoke, parallel to <strong>the</strong> ma<strong>in</strong> air stream.In water bath models, flow visualization and imag<strong>in</strong>g is more easily carried out than with airmodels. The use <strong>of</strong> clear Plexiglas <strong>for</strong> construct<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> model allows light to penetrate through<strong>the</strong> model, easily project<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> flow visualization onto a screen beh<strong>in</strong>d <strong>the</strong> model. Oftenprojectors are used as <strong>the</strong> light source, illum<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> entire water model setup and us<strong>in</strong>g adigital video camera to record flow patterns. Us<strong>in</strong>g water as <strong>the</strong> model<strong>in</strong>g fluid also enables amuch wider range <strong>of</strong> tracer materials to be used <strong>for</strong> visualization <strong>of</strong> flow patterns. Typicallycolored dye, mixed with water at <strong>the</strong> same temperature as <strong>the</strong> ambient fluid is used. Multiplecolors <strong>of</strong> dye can be used to help visualize more complex fluid flow patterns and <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>teractionbetween flows. However, with water models <strong>the</strong>re are potentially problems with match<strong>in</strong>g keydimensionless parameters, which will be discussed <strong>in</strong> Chapter 5.Captur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> flow patterns created with <strong>the</strong> air model<strong>in</strong>g methods requires appropriate light<strong>in</strong>gand imag<strong>in</strong>g equipment. Proper light<strong>in</strong>g can affect <strong>the</strong> visibility <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> flow patterns and <strong>the</strong>ability to record <strong>the</strong>m on film. Two ma<strong>in</strong> light sources are used <strong>for</strong> flow visualization: a)conventional light sources, such as spotlights, halogen lamps, mercury lamps, and b) lasers.Mirrors and lenses can be used with ei<strong>the</strong>r type <strong>of</strong> light source <strong>in</strong> order to brighten, expand, andlocate <strong>the</strong> desired shape <strong>of</strong> light. Us<strong>in</strong>g a comb<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>of</strong> a mirror and cyl<strong>in</strong>drical lens, a circularbeam <strong>of</strong> light from a laser can be trans<strong>for</strong>med <strong>in</strong>to a light sheet to visualize <strong>the</strong> structure <strong>of</strong>flows. This is one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> more common techniques used <strong>in</strong> flow visualization when air is used as<strong>the</strong> fluid. Light sheets are created by aim<strong>in</strong>g a beam from <strong>the</strong> light source at a cyl<strong>in</strong>drical lens,which <strong>the</strong>n, due to its geometry, creates a l<strong>in</strong>ear beam <strong>of</strong> light or a light sheet. The smaller <strong>the</strong>diameter <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> cyl<strong>in</strong>der, <strong>the</strong> larger <strong>the</strong> beam spread.However, captur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>se airflow patterns on film can prove to be a difficult task. Camera andlight source position can affect which cross-section is observed and <strong>the</strong> image quality. Theavailability <strong>of</strong> higher speed 35mm and digital cameras has improved <strong>the</strong> ability to capture flowvisualization images. Often <strong>the</strong> exposure or shutter time, resolution, aperture size can affect <strong>the</strong>quality <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> result<strong>in</strong>g image. High-speed cameras are <strong>of</strong> some concern with reduced-scalemodel<strong>in</strong>g us<strong>in</strong>g air as <strong>the</strong> fluid, as <strong>the</strong>y require <strong>in</strong>creased illum<strong>in</strong>ation, which <strong>of</strong>ten leads toadditional heat dissipation.4.2.2 Application to Build<strong>in</strong>gsEffective ventilation is important to <strong>the</strong>rmal and occupant com<strong>for</strong>t when evaluat<strong>in</strong>g anddesign<strong>in</strong>g spaces <strong>for</strong> use. Indoor air quality is also <strong>in</strong>fluenced by airflow. It is difficult to predict<strong>the</strong>se flow patterns without <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong> visualization techniques. A variety <strong>of</strong> methods have beendeveloped <strong>for</strong> a wide range <strong>of</strong> application types (Merzkirch 1987), but here <strong>the</strong> focus is on78
applications <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g full-scale build<strong>in</strong>gs, scaled models us<strong>in</strong>g water or air, and w<strong>in</strong>d tunnels.These are <strong>the</strong> three areas that are currently used to evaluate build<strong>in</strong>g design, and each has its ownunique requirements <strong>for</strong> flow visualization. There are three methods <strong>of</strong> flow visualizationdef<strong>in</strong>ed by Merzkirch: one which <strong>in</strong>troduces <strong>for</strong>eign material <strong>in</strong>to a flow (<strong>in</strong>direct method), onewhich records <strong>the</strong> vary<strong>in</strong>g density (optical method), and one which <strong>in</strong>troduces energy <strong>in</strong>to a flow.The latter two normally apply to compressible fluids, and are <strong>the</strong>re<strong>for</strong>e not presented here. The<strong>for</strong>mer is applied to <strong>in</strong>compressible fluids, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g air, and does not release fur<strong>the</strong>r energy <strong>in</strong>to<strong>the</strong> flow, which may <strong>in</strong>fluence <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>itial flow.Flow visualization is commonly used to evaluate mechanical systems to ensure that air is be<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>troduced and exhausted properly, and that <strong>the</strong> occupants have a healthy and com<strong>for</strong>tableenvironment <strong>in</strong> which to work. Several studies, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g one sponsored by <strong>the</strong> USDOEBuild<strong>in</strong>g Technologies Program (McWilliams 2002) cover <strong>the</strong> types <strong>of</strong> airflow measurementtechniques used <strong>in</strong> evaluat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>door environments. Fogg<strong>in</strong>g mach<strong>in</strong>es and smoke pencils havebeen used extensively <strong>in</strong> evaluat<strong>in</strong>g such systems as displacement ventilation and under-floorsystems. The airflow rate is controlled, with high enough velocities so that media can be<strong>in</strong>troduced and flow patterns traced and captured on film.When air is <strong>the</strong> fluid used <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> experimental procedure at both small and full scale, issues <strong>of</strong>visualization and neutral buoyancy are important, <strong>in</strong> addition to <strong>the</strong> dissipation rate, or ‗hangtime‘, <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> tracer material. This is <strong>of</strong> note particularly <strong>in</strong> full-scale build<strong>in</strong>gs when largevolumes <strong>of</strong> air and turbulent mix<strong>in</strong>g quickly dilute <strong>the</strong> tracer material and make visualization <strong>of</strong>airflow patterns on a large scale difficult. Localized flow patterns <strong>in</strong> full-scale build<strong>in</strong>gs canmake use <strong>of</strong> methods such as smoke pencils; if <strong>the</strong> local air velocities are relatively slow (lessthan 0.5 m/s).In evaluat<strong>in</strong>g fluid flow patterns <strong>in</strong> air models, <strong>in</strong> full-scale spaces and reduced-scale models, <strong>the</strong>ability <strong>of</strong> a tracer material to visibly follow <strong>the</strong> airflow, without effect<strong>in</strong>g or chang<strong>in</strong>g it, isimportant. This requires <strong>the</strong> tracer material to be neutrally buoyant, be visible, and not dispersetoo quickly. For air models, <strong>the</strong>se requirements leave only a few alternatives that were evaluated<strong>for</strong> use <strong>in</strong> both <strong>the</strong> full-scale prototype build<strong>in</strong>g and <strong>the</strong> reduced-scale air model. They <strong>in</strong>cludedDraeger smoke pencils, fog generat<strong>in</strong>g mach<strong>in</strong>e, and helium bubbles. In develop<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>methodology <strong>for</strong> evaluat<strong>in</strong>g and design<strong>in</strong>g naturally ventilated build<strong>in</strong>gs, <strong>the</strong> ability not only toanalyze <strong>the</strong> temperature pr<strong>of</strong>ile throughout <strong>the</strong> occupied space, but also to visualize <strong>the</strong> flowpatterns with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> space provides a stronger impetus <strong>for</strong> us<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> methodology. With <strong>the</strong>capability to map <strong>the</strong> path <strong>of</strong> outside air as it is <strong>in</strong>troduced, move through <strong>the</strong> space be<strong>in</strong>gventilated, and f<strong>in</strong>ally be exhausted, <strong>the</strong> methodology comb<strong>in</strong>ed with flow visualizationtechniques can fur<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> understand<strong>in</strong>g and improve <strong>the</strong> ventilation effectiveness, <strong>the</strong>rebyimprov<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> design <strong>of</strong> naturally ventilated build<strong>in</strong>gs.4.2.3 Methods UsedFor use <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> MIT test chamber with <strong>the</strong> reduced-scale air model, a marker was needed thatwould be neutrally buoyant, non-toxic, and highly visible. Neutrally buoyant helium bubbleswere <strong>in</strong>itially used <strong>for</strong> both a full-scale and reduced-scale room test case. This method <strong>in</strong>volveda s<strong>in</strong>gle-head Sage Action Helium Bubble Generator, which connected a tank <strong>of</strong> helium gas to areservoir <strong>of</strong> bubble fluid and an air compressor. Through trial and error, neutrally buoyant79
- Page 2 and 3:
Thesis Committee:Leon R. Glicksman,
- Page 4 and 5:
Table of ContentsTable of Contents
- Page 6 and 7:
7.1.3 Full Model Case .............
- Page 8 and 9:
Figure 41. Wind Direction Data for
- Page 10 and 11:
List of TablesTable 1. Energy End U
- Page 12 and 13:
Table 64. Comparison of Dimensionle
- Page 15 and 16:
Chapter 1.0IntroductionEnergy consu
- Page 17 and 18:
insulated building envelopes with t
- Page 19 and 20:
energy usage and efficient design.
- Page 21 and 22:
Figure 3. European Patent Office Bu
- Page 23:
selecting boundary conditions) to e
- Page 26 and 27:
2.2.1 Buoyancy-Driven VentilationVe
- Page 28 and 29: Figure 7. Neutral Pressure Level fo
- Page 30 and 31: Combined wind-buoyancy flow is more
- Page 32 and 33: design. The depth of natural ventil
- Page 34 and 35: of cooling required by 30 percent o
- Page 36 and 37: considered when determining how the
- Page 38 and 39: environmental conditions are examin
- Page 40 and 41: As natural ventilation is prevalent
- Page 43 and 44: Chapter 3.0Evaluation of Prototype
- Page 45 and 46: Figure 12. Interior Atrium ViewFigu
- Page 47 and 48: Table 8. Prototype Building Window
- Page 49 and 50: Figure 15. HOBO® H8 Series Tempera
- Page 51 and 52: Finally, airflow visualization was
- Page 53 and 54: only is the airflow almost never at
- Page 55 and 56: Table 10. Window Bag Device Measure
- Page 57 and 58: Mon 7-21Tue 7-22Wed 7-23Thu 7-24Fri
- Page 59 and 60: 12:00 AM1:00 AM2:00 AM3:00 AM4:00 A
- Page 61 and 62: 27-Jul27-Jul28-Jul28-Jul29-Jul30-Ju
- Page 63 and 64: A range of air exchange rates was f
- Page 65 and 66: the windows on the second floor, or
- Page 67 and 68: Total Electric (kWh/m2)Total Gas (k
- Page 69 and 70: movement, Houghton Hall has much le
- Page 71 and 72: Chapter 4.0Modeling and Visualizati
- Page 73 and 74: for future design of similar type b
- Page 75 and 76: lower and upper openings and natura
- Page 77: the acceptable diffusion rate, or
- Page 81 and 82: digital camera with both manually o
- Page 83 and 84: Chapter 5.0Dimensional Analysis and
- Page 85 and 86: u oHgHT2uocu Hpo1Re Ar1Re Pr(5.7)(5
- Page 87 and 88: X HM X HP(5.16)5.3.2 Kinematic Sim
- Page 89 and 90: Radiation was found to have an impa
- Page 91: height is used for the full-scale b
- Page 94 and 95: 6.3 Model Descriptions6.3.1 Physica
- Page 96 and 97: Figure 30. Floor Plan of the Protot
- Page 98 and 99: Figure 31. North Facade of Model wi
- Page 100 and 101: Monitoring data collected from the
- Page 102 and 103: By default, there was no accounting
- Page 104 and 105: 40-location card inserted into the
- Page 106 and 107: 6.5 ExperimentsTo evaluate the mode
- Page 108 and 109: modified to determine the impact of
- Page 110 and 111: Figure 39. Two Heated Zone ModelWit
- Page 112 and 113: minute interval, the model was assu
- Page 114 and 115: Figure 42. Cross-Section of Wind-Ge
- Page 116 and 117: Table 25. Wind-Assisted Ventilation
- Page 118 and 119: Figure 44. Heaters and Zones for a)
- Page 120 and 121: Height from Floor (m)Height from Fl
- Page 122 and 123: Where V is the outlet velocity, A o
- Page 124 and 125: Table 32. Conduction Heat Loss for
- Page 126 and 127: a) Air Modelb) Water ModelFigure 50
- Page 128 and 129:
Height from Floor (m)The temperatur
- Page 130 and 131:
Height from Floor (m)In the atrium
- Page 132 and 133:
First NorthUpper Window 0.17 m/s -0
- Page 134 and 135:
Height from Floor (m)the column at
- Page 136 and 137:
Height from Floor (m)Height from Fl
- Page 138 and 139:
Height from Floor (m)3.53.02.52.01.
- Page 140 and 141:
was less than 12 percent. These val
- Page 142 and 143:
Table 39. Variation of Outlet Wind
- Page 144 and 145:
temperature of the air was the same
- Page 146 and 147:
3.532.521.55m/s4m/s3m/s2m/s1m/s1.5m
- Page 148 and 149:
3.532.521.55m/s4m/s3m/s2m/s1m/s1.5m
- Page 150 and 151:
The average and exhaust internal bu
- Page 152 and 153:
Table 43. Calculated Wind and Buoya
- Page 154 and 155:
In the last two lines, for both the
- Page 156 and 157:
Figure 80. CFD Simulation of the Te
- Page 158 and 159:
uoyancy case the air from the groun
- Page 160 and 161:
160
- Page 162 and 163:
windows of naturally ventilated bui
- Page 164 and 165:
difficult to select the boundary co
- Page 166 and 167:
simulations are able to do would al
- Page 168 and 169:
Bordass, W.T., A.K.R. Bromley and A
- Page 170 and 171:
Linddament, M. 1996. Why CO2? Air I
- Page 172 and 173:
172
- Page 174 and 175:
MODEL: K20-8SERIAL: 10047RECORDER_I
- Page 176 and 177:
2 Boiler-3 50.00 C1 N1 1.0 ON ON OF
- Page 178 and 179:
|PW|DESCRIP |KW |KWH|KVA|KVH|------
- Page 180 and 181:
2:5 ;day_ofYr17:P30 ;EOT = 0.000075
- Page 182 and 183:
2:3136:P30 ;DUM2 = -0.040891:-4.089
- Page 184 and 185:
;7:21 ;input location;8:0 ;mulptipl
- Page 186 and 187:
;79:P22 ;EXC w/DELAY (only for dela
- Page 188 and 189:
1:45 ;port5 (homeSense)2:31 ;exit l
- Page 190 and 191:
13:P95 ;ENDIF14:P95 ;ENDIF15:P3 ;pu
- Page 192 and 193:
2:20 ;RH30:P70 ;sample1:12:20 ;RH31
- Page 194 and 195:
194
- Page 196 and 197:
Five Windows Open: Upper versus Low
- Page 198 and 199:
One Window Open: Upper versus Lower
- Page 200 and 201:
25 cm / 3 m 24.33 26.62 22.68 22.93
- Page 202 and 203:
25 cm / 3 m 24.07 25.26 22.65 22.78
- Page 204 and 205:
Two Stacks Open Temperature Stratif
- Page 206 and 207:
Stacks Closed Temperature Stratific
- Page 208 and 209:
2.3 24.31 24.65 24.781.4 23.35 23.6
- Page 210 and 211:
0.6 20.56 20.67 20.94 21.22 21.41 2