13.07.2015 Views

Methodology for the Evaluation of Natural Ventilation in ... - Cham

Methodology for the Evaluation of Natural Ventilation in ... - Cham

Methodology for the Evaluation of Natural Ventilation in ... - Cham

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

evaluat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> air exchange rate with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> build<strong>in</strong>gs. The methods used to measure <strong>the</strong>ventilation per<strong>for</strong>mance <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> build<strong>in</strong>g are described <strong>in</strong> this section.Build<strong>in</strong>g location and sit<strong>in</strong>g can <strong>in</strong>fluence <strong>the</strong> ventilation <strong>for</strong> a naturally ventilated build<strong>in</strong>g, but<strong>the</strong> focus <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> assessment was on <strong>the</strong> build<strong>in</strong>g itself and <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>ternal conditions. The w<strong>in</strong>dowgeometry proved to be a challenge. The effect <strong>of</strong> w<strong>in</strong>dow geometry has been studied to a limitedextent (Heiselberg 1999, 2001) but not specifically <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> top hung awn<strong>in</strong>g-type w<strong>in</strong>dows thatare used <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> prototype build<strong>in</strong>g. The awn<strong>in</strong>g-type w<strong>in</strong>dows are h<strong>in</strong>ged at <strong>the</strong> top, and are keptopen by friction at <strong>the</strong> h<strong>in</strong>ge. These w<strong>in</strong>dow types are used both <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> smaller, upper w<strong>in</strong>dowsas well as <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> lower, large occupant controlled w<strong>in</strong>dows. A method <strong>for</strong> determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>airflow rate <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>com<strong>in</strong>g air and exhaust air had to be developed because natural ventilation <strong>in</strong>build<strong>in</strong>gs relies on external conditions to provide fresh air and remove <strong>in</strong>ternal heat ga<strong>in</strong>s, andw<strong>in</strong>d speed and direction can change quickly. This characteristic <strong>in</strong>creases <strong>the</strong> complexity <strong>of</strong>evaluat<strong>in</strong>g ventilation effectiveness. Part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> complexity lies <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> effective open<strong>in</strong>g area <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> w<strong>in</strong>dow; it has both a horizontal area, as well as two vertical pieces, that can all affect <strong>the</strong>total airflow rate. Initially velocity measurements were taken <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> horizontal plane us<strong>in</strong>g handheldhot-wire anemometers, as that dimension was determ<strong>in</strong>ed to be <strong>the</strong> largest contributor to<strong>in</strong>com<strong>in</strong>g and outgo<strong>in</strong>g airflow <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> w<strong>in</strong>dow.The stack vents were a key design characteristic that had to be considered when evaluat<strong>in</strong>gventilation per<strong>for</strong>mance. The fans <strong>in</strong>tegrated <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> stack vents were <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> assessment.Hot-wire anemometers were used to measure <strong>the</strong> air velocity just outside <strong>the</strong> louvers from <strong>the</strong>exterior and just below <strong>the</strong> fan <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>terior. Measurements were taken under two conditions;with <strong>the</strong> fans on and <strong>of</strong>f. In addition, smoke pencils were used when tak<strong>in</strong>g measurements at <strong>the</strong>exterior to determ<strong>in</strong>e <strong>the</strong> direction <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> airflow.Ano<strong>the</strong>r method employed to determ<strong>in</strong>e <strong>the</strong> ventilation rate <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> prototype build<strong>in</strong>g was <strong>the</strong>monitor<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) levels with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> occupied spaces us<strong>in</strong>g a Tel-Aire carbondioxide sensor, comb<strong>in</strong>ed with a HOBO® H8 series data recorder. Measur<strong>in</strong>g CO 2 can be used todeterm<strong>in</strong>e air exchange rates, and to evaluate <strong>in</strong>door air quality. Several groups have def<strong>in</strong>edmaximum acceptable levels <strong>of</strong> CO 2 <strong>for</strong> <strong>of</strong>fice spaces. Levels above 1,000 ppm can lead tolethargy and headaches (ems, 2004). However, both <strong>the</strong> United States OSHA (OccupationalSafety and Health Association) and <strong>the</strong> United K<strong>in</strong>gdome BSRIA (Build<strong>in</strong>g Services Researchand In<strong>for</strong>mation Association) have def<strong>in</strong>ed maximum exposure limits to be 800 ppm over aneight-hour period <strong>for</strong> <strong>of</strong>fice areas. The CO 2 level is dependent on <strong>the</strong> ventilation distribution,occupant density, and amount <strong>of</strong> outside air be<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>troduced <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> space (ASHRAE 2001).When evaluat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>door environment with respect to occupant health, ASHRAE suggeststhat an <strong>in</strong>door level <strong>of</strong> CO 2 650 ppm above <strong>the</strong> outside level is representative <strong>of</strong> an air exchangerate <strong>of</strong> 20 cubic feet per m<strong>in</strong>ute, with an occupant density <strong>of</strong> 100 ft 2 per person (ASHRAE 1997).Occupant com<strong>for</strong>t is also affected by higher CO 2 levels, with 20 percent <strong>of</strong> people dissatisfied atCO 2 concentrations <strong>of</strong> 650 ppm above <strong>the</strong> outdoor level (Liddament, 1996). In <strong>of</strong>fices, carbondioxide levels are primarily due to <strong>the</strong> respiration <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> occupants. Initially <strong>the</strong> CO 2 andtemperature monitor was place outside, away from <strong>the</strong> build<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> order to record <strong>the</strong> externalconditions as a basel<strong>in</strong>e. Then <strong>the</strong> CO 2 sensor was placed at desk level, away from directexposure from an occupant, <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> second floor <strong>of</strong>fice area and data recorded every fifteenm<strong>in</strong>utes over <strong>the</strong> twelve-month monitor<strong>in</strong>g period. On site visits, <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> people <strong>in</strong> each<strong>of</strong>fice area was logged over <strong>the</strong> period <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> day and compared to <strong>the</strong> data recorded <strong>for</strong> that day.50

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!