Methodology for the Evaluation of Natural Ventilation in ... - Cham
Methodology for the Evaluation of Natural Ventilation in ... - Cham
Methodology for the Evaluation of Natural Ventilation in ... - Cham
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
model case us<strong>in</strong>g CFD simulations was completed with <strong>the</strong> stacks open and stacks closed, todeterm<strong>in</strong>e <strong>the</strong> result<strong>in</strong>g airflow patterns and temperature distributions. The stack open<strong>in</strong>gs werea design characteristic that affected <strong>the</strong> airflow <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> build<strong>in</strong>g, reduc<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> temperatures <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>upper-most floor. The w<strong>in</strong>d and w<strong>in</strong>d-buoyancy driven cases were carried out over a widerange<strong>of</strong> w<strong>in</strong>d speeds. The w<strong>in</strong>d-driven cases were used to determ<strong>in</strong>e <strong>the</strong> percentage <strong>of</strong> air thatexited through <strong>the</strong> stack without any buoyancy effects. A uni<strong>for</strong>m velocity was achieved at <strong>the</strong>south façade <strong>for</strong> each <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> w<strong>in</strong>d speeds from 1 to 5m/s <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> w<strong>in</strong>d-driven case and <strong>the</strong> exit<strong>in</strong>gair velocities at <strong>the</strong> north façade were uni<strong>for</strong>m as well. A wide range <strong>of</strong> w<strong>in</strong>d speeds were used,from 0.5 m/s to 5.0 m/s, to determ<strong>in</strong>e when <strong>the</strong> flow was dom<strong>in</strong>ated by w<strong>in</strong>d versus a more equalbalance between w<strong>in</strong>d and buoyancy flows through analysis us<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> Archimedes number.The key results from <strong>the</strong> experiments were presented <strong>in</strong> chapter seven. Temperaturedistributions, both measured from <strong>the</strong> physical model and <strong>the</strong> numerical simulation werecompared. The data were presented <strong>for</strong> all <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> experimental cases as <strong>the</strong> scaled build<strong>in</strong>gtemperatures, us<strong>in</strong>g calculated reference temperatures. The temperature distributions and airvelocities <strong>for</strong> each case were shown, along with descriptions <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> flow phenomena.Comparisons <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> result<strong>in</strong>g reduced-scale air model and selected data from <strong>the</strong> full-scaleprototype were discussed. The reduced-scale model showed comparable results <strong>for</strong> conditionswith stacks open when evaluated with data recorded from <strong>the</strong> prototype build<strong>in</strong>g <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> summercase. The comparisons <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> experimental data to <strong>the</strong> numerical simulations provided <strong>in</strong>sight<strong>in</strong>to some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> model<strong>in</strong>g attributes <strong>of</strong> computational fluid dynamics simulations.8.2 ConclusionsThe validation <strong>of</strong> this reduced-scale air model through comparisons with data obta<strong>in</strong>ed from <strong>the</strong>prototype build<strong>in</strong>g and numerical simulations provides an additional tool <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> prediction <strong>of</strong>airflow and temperature distribution <strong>in</strong> naturally ventilated build<strong>in</strong>gs. With careful attention torequirements <strong>of</strong> similitude to ensure scalability between <strong>the</strong> results recorded <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> reduced-scalemodel and <strong>the</strong> prototype build<strong>in</strong>g, this experimental reduced-scale model was able to predictaverage temperatures <strong>in</strong> each zone.Model<strong>in</strong>g airflow and temperature distribution <strong>in</strong> build<strong>in</strong>gs is a complex problem that researcherscont<strong>in</strong>ue to pursue. The variety <strong>of</strong> techniques available has applicability to <strong>the</strong> design <strong>of</strong>passively ventilated build<strong>in</strong>gs, but <strong>the</strong> user must be aware <strong>of</strong> limitations <strong>of</strong> each technique.There are several key factors to address when model<strong>in</strong>g airflow <strong>in</strong> build<strong>in</strong>gs: Clearly identify <strong>the</strong> problem Identify <strong>the</strong> govern<strong>in</strong>g phenomena Determ<strong>in</strong>e <strong>the</strong> desired detail <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> results Understand limitations <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> method usedFirst, <strong>the</strong> problem must be clearly identified. Whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> goal is to model <strong>in</strong> detail a specificspace or an entire build<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> purpose chosen can affect <strong>the</strong> selection <strong>of</strong> model<strong>in</strong>g technique. Ifan entire build<strong>in</strong>g is to be modeled, <strong>the</strong>n <strong>the</strong>re are limitations <strong>in</strong> terms <strong>of</strong> complexity <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> modelthat can be used regard<strong>in</strong>g analytical methods, space required <strong>for</strong> physical models, and timerequired <strong>for</strong> numerical models. Important values <strong>for</strong> model<strong>in</strong>g, both physical model<strong>in</strong>g andnumerical model<strong>in</strong>g, were identified <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> boundary conditions and level <strong>of</strong> detail. It is163