13.07.2015 Views

Methodology for the Evaluation of Natural Ventilation in ... - Cham

Methodology for the Evaluation of Natural Ventilation in ... - Cham

Methodology for the Evaluation of Natural Ventilation in ... - Cham

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

was less than 12 percent. These values, along with <strong>the</strong> measured velocities <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> w<strong>in</strong>d-drivenflow experiments are presented <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> stacks closed case <strong>in</strong> Table 35 and <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> stacks opencase <strong>in</strong> Table 36. When <strong>the</strong> stacks were closed, <strong>the</strong> only location <strong>of</strong> outflow <strong>of</strong> air was at <strong>the</strong>nor<strong>the</strong>rn façade. The <strong>in</strong>let w<strong>in</strong>dows on <strong>the</strong> south façade were smaller <strong>in</strong> size than <strong>the</strong> outletw<strong>in</strong>dows on <strong>the</strong> north façade. The <strong>in</strong>let w<strong>in</strong>dows were 2 cm tall by 12 cm long, whereas <strong>the</strong>outlet w<strong>in</strong>dows were 2 cm tall by 17 cm long. There were an equal number <strong>of</strong> w<strong>in</strong>dows on <strong>the</strong>north and south façades.Table 35. Average Inlet and Outlet Velocities <strong>for</strong> W<strong>in</strong>d-Driven Case: Stacks ClosedSett<strong>in</strong>g 3 Sett<strong>in</strong>g 2 Sett<strong>in</strong>g 1 Sett<strong>in</strong>g 1-83% Sett<strong>in</strong>g 1-57%W<strong>in</strong>dow Inlet 5.1 m/s 4.0 m/s 2.9 m/s 2.0 m/s 1.0 m/sW<strong>in</strong>dow Outlet 3.2 m/s 2.6 m/s 1.8 m/s 1.3 m/s 0.7 m/sAirflow Balance 10.6% 7.4% 11.6% 7.4% 0.2%Table 36. Average Inlet and Outlet Velocities <strong>for</strong> W<strong>in</strong>d-Driven Case: Stacks OpenSett<strong>in</strong>g 3 Sett<strong>in</strong>g 2 Sett<strong>in</strong>g 1 Sett<strong>in</strong>g 1-83% Sett<strong>in</strong>g 1-57%W<strong>in</strong>dow Inlet 5.1 m/s 4.1 m/s 3.0 m/s 2.0 m/s 1.0 m/sW<strong>in</strong>dow Outlet 2.8 m/s 2.3 m/s 1.7 m/s 1.1 m/s 0.6 m/sStack Outlet 3.1 m/s 2.2 m/s 1.9 m/s 1.0 m/s 0.5 m/sAirflow Balance 6.5% 6.6% 3.3% 9.1% 1.9%The air entered through all <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> w<strong>in</strong>dow open<strong>in</strong>gs on <strong>the</strong> south façade at <strong>the</strong> same velocity, andexited <strong>the</strong> north façade with uni<strong>for</strong>m velocity. In <strong>the</strong> stacks open scenario, approximately 85percent <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> air exited at <strong>the</strong> north façade and <strong>the</strong> rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g 15 percent <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> air exited through<strong>the</strong> stack open<strong>in</strong>gs. This was consistent over <strong>the</strong> range <strong>of</strong> w<strong>in</strong>d velocities used <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> w<strong>in</strong>d-onlycase.7.2.2 Comb<strong>in</strong>ed W<strong>in</strong>d-Buoyancy Driven CaseThe addition <strong>of</strong> heaters to mimic <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>ternal loads to <strong>the</strong> w<strong>in</strong>d cases resulted <strong>in</strong> a comb<strong>in</strong>edw<strong>in</strong>d-buoyancy airflow. The heaters were left on at full strength, while <strong>the</strong> speed <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> fans wasadjusted, from 5 m/s down to 0.5 m/s. Both temperature measurements and <strong>in</strong>let and outletvelocity measurements were recorded and an airflow balance calculated.The w<strong>in</strong>d speeds that were utilized <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> w<strong>in</strong>d-only cases were used <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> comb<strong>in</strong>ed w<strong>in</strong>dbuoyancycase. However, with <strong>the</strong>se <strong>in</strong>let velocities <strong>the</strong> w<strong>in</strong>d-driv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>for</strong>ce dom<strong>in</strong>ated <strong>the</strong>airflow. So reduced fan speeds were used to achieve w<strong>in</strong>d speeds at <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>let w<strong>in</strong>dows on <strong>the</strong>south façade <strong>of</strong> 2 m/s, 1 m/s, 0.7 m/s and 0.5 m/s. The measured <strong>in</strong>let and outlet air velocities<strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> stacks open case are presented <strong>in</strong> Table 37. As <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>let air velocity decreased, <strong>the</strong>percentage <strong>of</strong> air exit<strong>in</strong>g through <strong>the</strong> stacks <strong>in</strong>creased. This is shown graphically <strong>in</strong> Figure 68,where <strong>the</strong> dashed l<strong>in</strong>es represent <strong>the</strong> buoyancy case <strong>for</strong> reference. For <strong>the</strong> stacks closed case, all<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> enter<strong>in</strong>g air from <strong>the</strong> south façade where <strong>the</strong> w<strong>in</strong>d device is located exited throughw<strong>in</strong>dows located on <strong>the</strong> north façade. When <strong>the</strong>re is no w<strong>in</strong>d present, under pure buoyancydrivenflow, a greater percentage <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> outflow exits through <strong>the</strong> stacks. As <strong>the</strong> applied w<strong>in</strong>dspeed <strong>in</strong>creases, <strong>the</strong> percentage <strong>of</strong> outflow that exits through <strong>the</strong> stacks decreases.140

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!