13.07.2015 Views

Methodology for the Evaluation of Natural Ventilation in ... - Cham

Methodology for the Evaluation of Natural Ventilation in ... - Cham

Methodology for the Evaluation of Natural Ventilation in ... - Cham

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

By default, <strong>the</strong>re was no account<strong>in</strong>g <strong>for</strong> any effects due to radiation <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> CFD model. Throughmeasurements <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> reduced-scale air model, it was determ<strong>in</strong>ed that <strong>the</strong>re was a measurableamount <strong>of</strong> radiation to <strong>the</strong> ceil<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> each heated zone. The CFD model was modified <strong>in</strong> order toaccount <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> radiation that occurred <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>se zones. Additional simulations were carried outto obta<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> percent <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> heat <strong>in</strong>put that was radiated to <strong>the</strong> ceil<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> model. Bymeasur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> temperatures <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> surfaces with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> physical model, approximations <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong>heat transfer due to radiation were made us<strong>in</strong>g grey body assumptions <strong>for</strong> two parallel plates(Incropera and DeWitt 1996). Us<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> measured surface temperatures <strong>of</strong> 70 °C at <strong>the</strong>alum<strong>in</strong>um plate and 55°C at <strong>the</strong> ceil<strong>in</strong>g, and an emissivity <strong>of</strong> 0.7 <strong>for</strong> alum<strong>in</strong>um and 0.89 <strong>for</strong>wood, it was determ<strong>in</strong>ed that 30 percent <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> heat was radiated to <strong>the</strong> ceil<strong>in</strong>g.6.4 Experimental Equipment and MeasurementsThe equipment used <strong>in</strong> evaluat<strong>in</strong>g and monitor<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> reduced-scale air model are presented <strong>in</strong>this section, along with a description <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> facility <strong>in</strong> which <strong>the</strong> physical model was locatedthrough <strong>the</strong> duration <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> experimental procedure. The flow patterns, temperaturedistributions, and heat transfer issues with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> model were evaluated us<strong>in</strong>g a variety <strong>of</strong><strong>in</strong>strumentation and equipment. These pieces <strong>of</strong> equipment helped to quantify <strong>the</strong> temperaturedistribution and air velocities with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> model.Table 21. Summary <strong>of</strong> Equipment Used <strong>in</strong> ExperimentsEquipment Type Experimental UseTest <strong>Cham</strong>berControlled EnvironmentCR10X Data Acquisition System ThermocouplesKeithley Data Acquisition System ThermocouplesHot-wire Anemometer Air VelocityDraeger Smoke Pencils Flow VisualizationFogg<strong>in</strong>g Mach<strong>in</strong>eFlow VisualizationInfrared Temperature Gun Surface TemperaturesOmega® Heaters, 5W/<strong>in</strong> 2 , 500W each Internal Loads6.4.1 EquipmentA well-<strong>in</strong>solated test chamber was used as <strong>the</strong> control environment <strong>in</strong> which <strong>the</strong> scaled-modelwas placed. There<strong>for</strong>e <strong>the</strong> ambient conditions around <strong>the</strong> model and <strong>the</strong> fluctuations normallyseen <strong>in</strong> typical build<strong>in</strong>g environments could be controlled. The MIT test chamber <strong>in</strong> its entiretyconsisted <strong>of</strong> a well-<strong>in</strong>sulated enclosure separated <strong>in</strong>to two rooms by a partition wall with a large,double-glazed w<strong>in</strong>dow. The scale model was located <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> ma<strong>in</strong> room, a well-<strong>in</strong>sulated s<strong>in</strong>gleroom that had a dedicated ventilation and control system to manage <strong>the</strong> conditions with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> testchamber. All walls had an <strong>in</strong>sulat<strong>in</strong>g value <strong>of</strong> R-30, or 5.3 Km 2 /W. The test chamber wasoutfitted with a comb<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>of</strong> permanent monitor<strong>in</strong>g equipment and portable measur<strong>in</strong>gdevices.The supply air entered <strong>the</strong> test chamber through a s<strong>in</strong>gle duct open<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> corner, and air wasexhausted through a grill ceil<strong>in</strong>g exhaust. Care was taken to ensure that <strong>the</strong>re were no significantdrafts from <strong>the</strong> supply diffuser blow<strong>in</strong>g on <strong>the</strong> model that might have affected <strong>the</strong> measurements.The heat<strong>in</strong>g, ventilation, and air-condition<strong>in</strong>g (HVAC) system that conditioned <strong>the</strong> test chamber102

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!