13.07.2015 Views

Methodology for the Evaluation of Natural Ventilation in ... - Cham

Methodology for the Evaluation of Natural Ventilation in ... - Cham

Methodology for the Evaluation of Natural Ventilation in ... - Cham

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

natural-environment features, <strong>the</strong> associated changes <strong>of</strong> chemical and physical composition, and<strong>the</strong> associated stresses <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> immersed solids.A model with <strong>the</strong> same geometry and dimensions as <strong>the</strong> scaled physical model was created us<strong>in</strong>g<strong>the</strong> PHOENICS program. The surround<strong>in</strong>g conditions were made to simulate <strong>the</strong> test chamberconditions, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> dimensions, wall temperature and location with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> chamber. As with<strong>the</strong> scaled physical model, <strong>the</strong>re are cutouts <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> w<strong>in</strong>dow and stack vent open<strong>in</strong>gs with <strong>the</strong>same size as those elements <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> physical model. The CFD model however did not usecolumns <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> simulation, as <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> scaled physical model <strong>the</strong> columns have a negligible effecton both <strong>the</strong> airflow patterns and temperature. A cross-section <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> CFD model is shown <strong>in</strong>Figure 35.Figure 35. PHOENICS Scale Model GeometryThe CFD s<strong>of</strong>tware was found to have limitations <strong>for</strong> use <strong>in</strong> simulations <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> reduced scale airmodel. Surfaces such as walls and floors are considered adiabatic <strong>in</strong> CFD simulations. Therewas no easy way to simulate <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>rmal properties associated with heat loss through <strong>the</strong>envelope or between floor constructions. The surfaces <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> experimental case, <strong>the</strong> reducedscaleair model, were not adiabatic and had some amount <strong>of</strong> heat loss through <strong>the</strong> envelope.Results from <strong>the</strong> reduced scale air model with heat loss <strong>for</strong> each experiment provided data <strong>for</strong>comparison with each correspond<strong>in</strong>g CFD simulation with adiabatic walls. The strength <strong>of</strong> heatsource used <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> reduced-scale air model were also described <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> CFD model. Theprescribed heat sources <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> CFD model were 283W each, to simulate <strong>the</strong> heaters <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>physical scaled model, and <strong>the</strong>re<strong>for</strong>e <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>ternal loads <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> prototype build<strong>in</strong>g. The heatsource, sited <strong>in</strong> approximately <strong>the</strong> same location as <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> scaled physical model, was distributedover <strong>the</strong> entire size <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> alum<strong>in</strong>um plates. In <strong>the</strong> s<strong>in</strong>gle zone model, heat loss through <strong>the</strong> wallswas modeled <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> atrium portion, as is described <strong>in</strong> Section 6.5.1.1 S<strong>in</strong>gle Heated ZoneExperiments.101

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!