13.07.2015 Views

Etiology of diarrheal disease in India - The INCLEN Trust

Etiology of diarrheal disease in India - The INCLEN Trust

Etiology of diarrheal disease in India - The INCLEN Trust

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Etiology</strong> <strong>of</strong> Diarrheal Disease <strong>in</strong><strong>India</strong>Anuradha BoseChristian Medical College,Vellore


Objectives1. Why is etiology <strong>of</strong> diarrhea important?2. Describe the challenges <strong>in</strong> determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g diarrheaetiology3. Characterize the etiology <strong>of</strong> diarrhea <strong>in</strong> South Asia4. Describe key f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs from locally relevant andpivotal <strong>in</strong>ternational sources <strong>of</strong> data5. Describe the epidemiology <strong>of</strong> rotavirus2


Why is etiology important?• For l<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g cl<strong>in</strong>ical presentations to organismscaus<strong>in</strong>g them• To facilitate evidence based treatmentprotocols• To provide estimates <strong>of</strong> burden <strong>of</strong> <strong>disease</strong>,particularly <strong>in</strong> <strong>disease</strong>s for which vacc<strong>in</strong>es areavailable.3


Cl<strong>in</strong>ical management <strong>of</strong> diarrhoea• Syndromic approach as <strong>in</strong> IMNCI• ORS• Z<strong>in</strong>c• Promotion <strong>of</strong> (cont<strong>in</strong>ued) breast feed<strong>in</strong>g• Water, Sanitation and Hygiene <strong>in</strong>terventions.• Protocols vary where there is blood <strong>in</strong> stools.4


Methods for determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g etiology <strong>of</strong> diarrhea<strong>Etiology</strong> generally determ<strong>in</strong>ed by exam<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>of</strong> astood sample from a child with diarrhea:Culture: bacteriaImmunoassay: viruses and parasitesAntigen detection: virusesNucleic acid detection: viruses5


Lead<strong>in</strong>g Pathogens Caus<strong>in</strong>g Diarrhea <strong>in</strong> ChildrenBacterial pathogensEscherichia coliShigella sp.Salmonella speciesCampylobacter jejuniVibrio choleraeParasitic PathogensGiardia lambliaCryptosporidium speciesViral PathogensRotavirusMeasles virusNorwalk virusAdenovirusesAstrovirusEffective vacc<strong>in</strong>esavailable6


Challenges <strong>in</strong> determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the etiology <strong>of</strong> diarrhea• Diagnosis based on caregiver’s report• Availability <strong>of</strong> a well equipped cl<strong>in</strong>ical microbiologylaboratory is a prerequisite• Conventional assays, immunological and moleculardetection methods• Enteric pathogens isolation <strong>in</strong> asymptomatic controls• Colonization with potential pathogenic bacteria• Isolation <strong>of</strong> multiple pathogens <strong>in</strong> same case• Prior antibiotic exposure7


Global data <strong>of</strong> relevance:• Global Enteric Multicentric study; GEMS• Malnutrition and Enteral Diseases:Mal-ED8


<strong>Etiology</strong> <strong>of</strong> diarrhea: GEMS studyObjective: Estimate the population-based burden, microbiologicetiology, and adverse cl<strong>in</strong>ical consequences <strong>of</strong> moderate to severediarrhea among children 0 to 59 months <strong>of</strong> age liv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> sub-Saharan Africa and S. AsiaSites: Countries with moderate/high under 5 mortalityAfrica: <strong>The</strong> Gambia, Mali, Mozambique, KenyaAsia: <strong>India</strong>, Bangladesh, PakistanMethods:Eligible cases enrolled throughout the year with<strong>in</strong> age strataAge, gender, village-matched controls enrolledAll children provided a stool sample or rectal swab prior toantibiotic use9


Frequency Distribution <strong>of</strong> Putative Pathogens <strong>in</strong> Casesand Controls, Africa (0-11 mos.) exclud<strong>in</strong>g Giardia0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30%RotavirusCryptosporidiumEAEC (aata only)GiardiaEAEC (aaic only)ETEC (LT/ST or ST)EPEC (eae+bfpA+)Norovirus GIIETEC (LT only)C. jejuniEPEC (eae- bfpA+)Adenovirus (non-40/41)EPEC (eae+ bfpA-)SapovirusShigella (any)EAEC (aata/aaic)E. histolyticaAstrovirusNon-typhoidal SalmonellaNorovirus GICampylobacter coliAdenovirus 40/41AeromonasV. cholerae O1V. cholerae O139S. typhiCases (n=1578)Controls (n=1787)1


GEMS study <strong>India</strong>; results 588 casesRotavirus 151 Astrovirus 19Giardia 138 tEPEC 18Cryptosporidium 98 ETEC - LT only 17Campylobacter jejuni 83 E. histolytica 14EAEC 72 Adenovirus non-40-41 11Norovirus GII 51 Campylobacter coli 5Shigella 40 Norovirus GI 4Adenovirus 40/41 29 Aeromonas 2ST-onlyETEC 26 EHEC 2Sapovirus 24 Non-typhoidal Salm 1V. cholerae O1 21 ETEC - LT/S 2111


Most Common Etiologic Agents by Age0-11 12-23 24-59Rotavirus X X XShigella X X XCryptosporidium X X XETEC (ST or LT/ST) X X XV. cholerae O1 X XC. jejuni (Asia only) X XAeromonas (ma<strong>in</strong>ly Asia) X X XNTS (Africa) X XtEPEC X XaEPECXEAggECAdenoviruses 40/41XNorovirus GII X XSapovirusXE. histolytica X X12


Risk factors for death <strong>in</strong> GEMSIn a multivariate model, risk <strong>of</strong> death was<strong>in</strong>creased <strong>in</strong>• Younger age• Low weight for age• Offer<strong>in</strong>g less fluids dur<strong>in</strong>g illness• Isolation <strong>of</strong> tEPEC and Cryptosporidium13


Nationally available data:14


Comparison <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>fection status by different enteric pathogens <strong>in</strong> < 5 and ≥5age groups. GB Nair et al; Gut Pathol 2010; Vol2 :415


Emerg<strong>in</strong>g trends observed <strong>in</strong> diarrhoeal <strong>disease</strong> surveillance <strong>in</strong>Kolkata: GB Nair: Gut path 2010 : 2 ;4Increase <strong>in</strong> V. cholerae O1 <strong>in</strong>fection among


<strong>Etiology</strong> <strong>of</strong> Diarrhea: <strong>India</strong>Cases with Specific Pathogen Isolated, %<strong>Etiology</strong> <strong>of</strong> diarrhea <strong>in</strong> hospitalized children


Global and national estimates<strong>of</strong> rotavirus <strong>disease</strong>18


Estimated rotavirus deaths for children under 5, 2008Global estimate: 435,00020


Estimated rotavirus deaths for children under 5, 2008Global estimate: 435,000<strong>India</strong> (21.8%)Nigeria (9.1%)Pakistan (8.6%)DR Congo (7.2%)Ethiopia (6.2%)Afghanistan (5.6%)Uganda (2.3%)Indonesia (2.2%)Bangladesh (2.2%)Angola (1.9%)10,6379,9709,8578,78832,65328,21825,42341,05739,14498,621% is percent <strong>of</strong> total globalrotavirus deaths67% <strong>of</strong> all rotavirus deathsoccur <strong>in</strong> these 10 countriesSource: http://www.who.<strong>in</strong>t/immunization_monitor<strong>in</strong>g/burden/rotavirus_estimates/en/<strong>in</strong>dex.html21


Estimated rotavirus morbidity <strong>in</strong> <strong>India</strong> for children under 5EventsRisk122,000-153,000 deaths 1 <strong>in</strong> every 177-196 children457,000-884,000 hospitalizations 1 <strong>in</strong> every 31-59 children2 million outpatient visits1 <strong>in</strong> every 13 childrenTate et al. Vacc<strong>in</strong>e 2009: F18-F24 22


Epidemiology <strong>of</strong> Rotavirus23


RotavirusRNA virus <strong>in</strong> the family ReoviridaeFive types: A, B, C, D, ERotavirus A causes >90% <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>fections <strong>in</strong> humansWith<strong>in</strong> rotavirus A there are differentstra<strong>in</strong>sSerotypes classified based on two surfaceprote<strong>in</strong>s (G and P)Charles D. Humphrey, CDC24


Common stra<strong>in</strong>s worldwide4-5 rotavirus stra<strong>in</strong>s are common worldwideP[8]G47.5%P[4]G211.5%P[8]G32.8%P[8]G152.2%other18.2%P[6]; G1 toG4, G85%P[6]G9P[8]G92.3%Gentsch JID 200525


Common stra<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong> <strong>India</strong>Rotavirus G serotype diversity <strong>in</strong> Northern and Southern <strong>India</strong>*Northern <strong>India</strong>9%Southern <strong>India</strong>5%G110%38%18%35%G2G411%8%4%21%5%7%8%21%G9GMGNTOther* Southern <strong>India</strong> was def<strong>in</strong>ed as Andhra Pradesh, Maharashtra, and states south <strong>of</strong> theseKahn et al. 201226


Common stra<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong> <strong>India</strong>Rotavirus P serotype diversity <strong>in</strong> Northern and Southern <strong>India</strong>*Northern <strong>India</strong>Southern <strong>India</strong>13%12%1%37%26%0%36%P[8]P[4]P[6]6%P[M]14%4%P[NT]22%27%Other* Southern <strong>India</strong> was def<strong>in</strong>ed as Andhra Pradesh, Maharashtra, and states south <strong>of</strong> theseKahn et al. 201227


Age <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>fectionPrimarily affects childrenBy five years <strong>of</strong> age nearly all children will have been <strong>in</strong>fected withrotavirus at least onceImmunity develops with each <strong>in</strong>fectionSubsequent <strong>in</strong>fections are less severeAdults rarely develop cl<strong>in</strong>ical <strong>disease</strong>28


PercentageAge Distribution <strong>of</strong> Rotavirus Infections Identified through the<strong>India</strong>n Rotavirus Surveillance Network, 2007-200950454035302520151050Kolkata Pune Vellore & Trichy Delhi Mumbai0 - 2 3 - 5 6 - 11 12 - 23 24 - 35 36 - 47 48 - 59Age (Months)Kang et al, JID, 2009 29


Distribution <strong>of</strong> community and hospital rotavirus<strong>in</strong>fections by age : Banerjee et al: Jl Cl<strong>in</strong> Micro 2006 JulAgeNo. <strong>of</strong><strong>diarrheal</strong>episodes <strong>in</strong>communityNo. (%) <strong>of</strong> RVpositive cases<strong>in</strong> communityNo. <strong>of</strong> <strong>diarrheal</strong>episodes <strong>in</strong>hospitalNo. (%) <strong>of</strong> RVpositive cases<strong>in</strong> hospital0-5 522 25 (4.8) 85 11 (12.9)6-11 431 39 (9.0) 123 52 (42.3)12-17 157 18 (11.5) 71 19 (26.7)18 and 42 0 (0.0) 57 12 (21.1)aboveUnknown 0 0 7 0Total 1152 82 (7.1) 343 94 (27.4)


AgeRelationship <strong>of</strong> age with severity <strong>of</strong> rotavirusdiarrhea <strong>in</strong> the community and the hospitalBanerjee et al: Jl Cl<strong>in</strong> Micro 2006 JulNo. <strong>of</strong>children withrotavirusdiarrhea <strong>in</strong>communityNo. (%) <strong>of</strong>severe cases <strong>in</strong>communityNo. <strong>of</strong>children withrotavirusdiarrhea <strong>in</strong>hospitalNo. <strong>of</strong> severecases / totalno.<strong>of</strong> cases <strong>in</strong>hospital (%)0-5 25 6 (24) 11 5/10 (50.0)6-11 39 6 (15.4) 52 31/50 (62.0)12-17 18 6 (33.3) 19 11/19 (57.9)18 and 0 0 12 4/11 (36.4)aboveTotal 82 18 (22.0) 94 51/90 (56.7)


What does this <strong>disease</strong> mean <strong>in</strong> terms <strong>of</strong>how much it costs society?32


Economic Burden <strong>of</strong> Rotavirus <strong>in</strong> <strong>India</strong>Total direct medical cost burden <strong>of</strong> rotavirus diarrhea<strong>in</strong> children


Economic evaluation <strong>of</strong> vacc<strong>in</strong>es:• Cost-sav<strong>in</strong>g: averted costs are greater than<strong>in</strong>tervention.• Cost-effectiveness: compare net costs withhealth ga<strong>in</strong>s• Decisions for vacc<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong>tro depend, amongother factors, on: Health burdenVacc<strong>in</strong>e effectivenessCost effectiveness <strong>of</strong> the programRhe<strong>in</strong>gans et al: JID 2009; 20034


• Vacc<strong>in</strong>ation would be cost sav<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Lower andupper middle <strong>in</strong>come countries with a vacc<strong>in</strong>eprice <strong>of</strong> < $0.53 -$2.00 per dose• <strong>The</strong> cost effectiveness is reduced if vacc<strong>in</strong>ecoverage is lowered or with delays <strong>in</strong>vacc<strong>in</strong>ation35


Recommendations based on prelim<strong>in</strong>aryGEMS results:Introduce licensed Rotavirus vacc<strong>in</strong>es <strong>in</strong>to the EPI <strong>of</strong>high burden countries.Consider cholera vacc<strong>in</strong>es <strong>in</strong> high risk pre-schoolchildrenGiven the burden <strong>of</strong> Cryptosporidium, <strong>in</strong>vest <strong>in</strong>development <strong>of</strong> diagnostics, therapy and vacc<strong>in</strong>esImplement WASH <strong>in</strong>terventions36


Summary• Rotavirus <strong>disease</strong> is present <strong>in</strong> <strong>India</strong>• It largely affects the vulnerable young• Mortality with diarrhoea is <strong>in</strong>creased withassociated malnutrition• (<strong>India</strong> has a lot <strong>of</strong> malnutrition)• Death due to diarrhoea <strong>in</strong> children occurs<strong>of</strong>ten <strong>in</strong> cases which have not accessed healthcare for the diarrhoeal episode• Vacc<strong>in</strong>es might help avert these deaths.37


Thank youwww.<strong>in</strong>dvac.org38

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!