12.07.2015 Views

James Phillips Introduction For those of you not famil

James Phillips Introduction For those of you not famil

James Phillips Introduction For those of you not famil

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

2Theodore Kaczynski, the “Unabomber,” <strong>of</strong>fers a singularly vivid and provocative casestudy in the relationship between political extremism and psychopathology. Kaczynski issingular both in the grey area he occupies between ideology and psychopathology, on the onehand, and in the extraordinarily extensive documentation that is available through his ownwritings, 22,000 pages, and the record <strong>of</strong> the legal process that ended in his conviction, on theother.Critique <strong>of</strong> TechnologyIn this presentation I begin with a brief summary <strong>of</strong> Kaczynski’s ‘Manifesto’, and I dothat for a specific purpose - to establish from the outset Kaczynski’s credentials as an articulate,thoughtful critic <strong>of</strong> contemporary industrial society. In his critique he joins the company <strong>of</strong> otheranalysts <strong>of</strong> modern technology such as Jacques Ellul, whom Kaczynski has read andincorporated into his own document. I will <strong>not</strong> attempt to compare the quality <strong>of</strong> Kaczynski’swork with that <strong>of</strong> better known critics <strong>of</strong> technology. I only want establish that his critique iscarefully reasoned, stands on its own merits, and has proved prescient in many ways. The point<strong>of</strong> presenting his work at the outset is that, were I to begin with his biography and save hiscritique for later, <strong>you</strong> would be inclined to dismiss it out <strong>of</strong> hand as the work <strong>of</strong> a derangedcrank.While I will focus in this summary on the ‘Manifesto’ <strong>of</strong> 2005, Kaczynski had long beeninterested in the critique <strong>of</strong> technology and had written a shorter, equally articulate essay in1971, well before he began his career <strong>of</strong> political terrorism. The 1971 document begins: “In thesepages it is argued that continued scientific and technical progress will inevitably result in theextinction <strong>of</strong> individual liberty. I use the word ‘inevitably’ in the following sense: One might -possibly - imagine certain conditions <strong>of</strong> society in which liberty could coexist with technology,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!