12.07.2015 Views

statement of claim

statement of claim

statement of claim

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

abridges or impairs the Plaintiffs’ rights and/or title in or over the said TanaPengurip or ancestral or NCR Land for being the source <strong>of</strong> the Plaintiffs’livelihood and for their generations to come.18.1 Since time immemorial the ancestors <strong>of</strong> the Plaintiffs hadestablished and maintained a comprehensive scheme by whichthrough their laws, customs, tradition and practices, havedetermined the questions <strong>of</strong> ownership, land use management andoccupation <strong>of</strong> land, forests and rivers within their said TanaPengurip or ancestral or NCR Land.18.2 By their laws, customs, tradition and practices, they were entitled tothe rights <strong>of</strong> ownership and/or use and/or occupation <strong>of</strong> the saidTana Pengurip or ancestral or NCR Land and access to all theproducts therein, as well as to the hunting grounds and fishingwaters. The Plaintiffs have exercised the aforesaid rights over thesaid Tana Pengurip or ancestral or NCR Land since timeimmemorial until to this day.18.3 Therefore, the Plaintiffs had prior to the enactment <strong>of</strong> the saidlegislation, accrued and acquired vested native customary rightsover the said Tana Pengurip or ancestral or NCR Land.18.4 For the reasons aforesaid, the said accrued rights could not be, andwere never lawfully vested in the state government under article 47<strong>of</strong> the constitution <strong>of</strong> the state <strong>of</strong> Sarawak or howsoever, otherwise.18.5 No timber licence, temporary or otherwise, could therefore beissued over the Plaintiffs’ said Tana Pengurip or ancestral or NCRLand.No Extinguishment Of The Plaintiffs’ NCR19. There was no extinguishment <strong>of</strong> the Plaintiffs’ NCR within the landcovered by the said timber licence before the same were issued and/orgranted to the 1 st Defendant; whereas compensation in accordance withthe Land Code <strong>of</strong> Sarawak and the Federal Constitution is required to bemade or paid to the Plaintiffs to effect such extinguishment. The issuance<strong>of</strong> the said timber licence in such circumstance is therefore unlawful,unconstitutional, and improper and henceforth, their issuance and grantwere null and void.19.1 The said timber licence was issued without the consent <strong>of</strong> thePlaintiffs, who are the rightful owners and/or proprietors and/or9

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!