QOF Plus Year 1 - Imperial College London
QOF Plus Year 1 - Imperial College London QOF Plus Year 1 - Imperial College London
ReferencesAniansson, G., Alm, B., Andersson, B., Hakansson, A., Larsson, P., Nylen, O., Peterson, H., Rigner, P.,Svanborg, M., Sabharwal, H (1994) A prospective cohort study on breast-feeding and otitis media inSwedish infants Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal; 13 (3) 183-188.Bick, D., MacArthur, C., Knowles, H., Winter, H. (2002), Postnatal Care. Evidence and Guidelines forManagement. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone.Bolling K, Grant C, Hamlyn B, Thornton A. (2007) Infant Feeding Survey 2005. The Information Centre.Burr, M. L., Miskelly, F. G., Butland, B. K., Merrett, T. G., & Vaughan-Williams, E. (1989) Environmentalfactors and symptoms in infants at high risk of allergy Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health43 (2) 125-132.Demott K, Bick D, Norman R, Ritchie G, Turnbull N, Adams C, Barry C, Byrom S, Elliman D, Marchant S,Mccandlish R, Mellows H, Neale C, Parkar M, Tait P, Taylor C, (2006) Clinical Guidelines And EvidenceReview For Post Natal Care: Routine Post Natal Care Of Recently Delivered Women And Their BabiesLondon: National Collaborating Centre For Primary Care And Royal College Of General Practitioners.Department of Health. (1996), Breastfeeding: good practice guidance to the NHS Department ofHealth.Department of Health (2004), National Service Framework for Children, Young People and MaternityServices: Core Standards. London: Department of Health.Department of Health (2004) Choosing Health: Making healthy choices easier. The Stationary Office.LondonDyson L, Renfrew M, McFadden A, et al. (2006) Promotion of breastfeeding initiation and duration:Evidence into practice briefing. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence.Dyson L, McCormick F, Renfrew MJ (2007). Interventions for promoting the initiation of breastfeeding.(Cochrane Review). In: Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Issue 2, Chichester: WileyInterscience.Hamlyn, B., Brooker, S, Oleinikova, K. (2002) Infant Feeding 2000: a survey conducted on behalf of theDepartment of Health, the Scottish Executive, the National Assembly for Wales and the Department ofHealth Social Services and Public Health in Northern Ireland. London: Stationary Office.HM Treasury (2007) PSA Delivery Agreement 12: Improve the health and wellbeing of children andyoung people. The Stationary Office: LondonHowie, P. W., Forsyth, J. S., Ogston, S. A., Clark, A., & Florey, C. D.(1990) Protective effect of breastfeeding against infection British Medical Journal; 300(6716) 11-16.NICE Clinical Guideline (2008) Antenatal Care. National Institute for Health and Clinical ExcellenceNICE public health guidance 11 (2008) Improving the nutrition of pregnant and breastfeeding mothersand children in low-income households. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence.Oddy, W. H., Holt, P. G., Sly, P. D., Read, A. W., Landau, L. I., Stanley, F. J., Kendall, G. E., & Burton, P. R.(1999) Association between breast feeding and asthma in 6 year old children: findings of aprospective birth cohort study British Medical Journal; 319(7213) 815-819.Pisacane, A., Graziano, L., Mazzarella, G., Scarpellino, B., & Zona, G. (1992) Breast-feeding and urinarytract infection Journal of Pediatrics; 120 (1). 87-89.UNICEF UK. UNICEF UK baby friendly initiative: seven point plan. 2004 [Accessed 30.7.08]; Availablefrom URL:www.babyfriendly.org.uk/commun.aspWilson, A. C., Forsyth, J. S., Greene, S. A., Irvine, L., Hau, C., & Howie, P. W. (1998) Relation of infantdiet to childhood health: seven year follow up of cohort of children in Dundee infant feeding studyBritish Medical Journal 316 (7124) 21-25.World Health Organisation (2003) Global strategy for infant and young child feeding. Geneva: WorldHealth Organisation.Zeuner, D (2008) Annual Report of the Director of Public Health 2007-2008 Hammersmith and FulhamPCT50
QOF+ report on ethnicityProposed IndicatorsIndicatorQOF+pointsPaymentstages+ ETHNICITY 1. The percentage of patients on one or morepractice registers for: CVD At-Risk, Hypertension, CHD,Diabetes, Mental Health and Stroke and TIA whose notesrecord their ethnicity and first language+ ETHNICITY 2. The percentage of patients who have newlyregistered with the practice on or after December 01 2008whose notes record their ethnicity and first language30 60-90%20 90-100%It is recognised that this indicator set partly overlaps with the existing RECORDS 21 QOF Indicatorand also partly overlaps with the recently announced Directed Enhanced Service (DES) forEthnicity for 2009/10 (which provides incentives for collection of data on ethnicity and religion).BackgroundIt is now recognised that health-seeking behaviour, use of health services, and differential accessto health services among different ethnic groups in the UK may explain patterns of ill-health(Hargreaves, 2007).The cultural appropriateness of health-care provision in the UK has been questioned, and there isevidence of inequity in access to services, both at the referral level from GPs and in the quality ofcare offered, which may differ both within individual ethnic groups and between ethnic groupsand the White population (Arai et al., 2002).Through the use of good and robust ethnic group data on patients and service users, the NHS andcouncils will be in a better position to address health inequalities, difficulties in access anddiscrimination experienced by some black and minority ethnic individuals and communities. As aresult, the NHS will be better placed to contribute to national targets and meet local corestandards (DoH, 2007b).51
- Page 22 and 23: The quality and outcomes framework
- Page 24 and 25: Effect of measurement on health ine
- Page 26 and 27: How might a local QOF operate in pr
- Page 28 and 29: Doran T, Fullwood C, Kontopantelis
- Page 30 and 31: Continued…QOFQOF+IndicatorUpperTh
- Page 32 and 33: Alcohol Chapter 4 (p27)IndicatorQOF
- Page 34 and 35: RecordsIndicator+ PRESCRIPTION 1. T
- Page 36 and 37: Patient experience Chapter 12 (p77)
- Page 39 and 40: C3QOF+ report on cardiovasculardise
- Page 41 and 42: Creation of practice CVD at-risk re
- Page 43 and 44: achieved through primary prevention
- Page 45 and 46: Workload and training implicationsI
- Page 47 and 48: QOF+ report on alcoholProposed indi
- Page 49 and 50: Local contextThe Hammersmith and Fu
- Page 51 and 52: Workload and training implicationsR
- Page 53 and 54: QOF+ report on smokingProposed indi
- Page 55 and 56: Local context24% of adults (35,000)
- Page 57: ReferencesBritish Medical Associati
- Page 60 and 61: The NICE Clinical Guideline on Ante
- Page 62 and 63: Health impactThere are significant
- Page 65 and 66: QOF+ report on breastfeedingPropose
- Page 67 and 68: Local contextIn 2006/7, the percent
- Page 69: Degree of perceived professional co
- Page 73 and 74: Associated Morbidity and MortalityT
- Page 75: Workload and training implicationsP
- Page 78 and 79: Priority and relevance to national
- Page 80 and 81: Specific reasons for this framework
- Page 82 and 83: Workload and training implicationsT
- Page 85 and 86: QOF+ report on newpatient screening
- Page 87 and 88: Review of evidence to support the p
- Page 89 and 90: QOF+ report onpatient informationPr
- Page 91 and 92: Priority and relevance to national
- Page 93 and 94: Degree of perceived support from pa
- Page 95 and 96: ReferencesCarpenter A and Mayers A
- Page 97 and 98: QOF+ report onpatient experiencePro
- Page 99 and 100: Rosen et al. (2001) categorised ini
- Page 101 and 102: The National 2007 Quality and Outco
- Page 103: ReferencesBaker, R (2007) Quality a
- Page 106 and 107: BackgroundThe United Nations Conven
- Page 108 and 109: In March 2008, a PCT audit of signi
- Page 110 and 111: Impact on health inequalitiesPovert
- Page 112 and 113: Training and support requirements f
- Page 114 and 115: Information on self-directed online
- Page 116 and 117: New patient screeningProposed train
- Page 118 and 119: Patient experienceLearning disabili
<strong>QOF</strong>+ report on ethnicityProposed IndicatorsIndicator<strong>QOF</strong>+pointsPaymentstages+ ETHNICITY 1. The percentage of patients on one or morepractice registers for: CVD At-Risk, Hypertension, CHD,Diabetes, Mental Health and Stroke and TIA whose notesrecord their ethnicity and first language+ ETHNICITY 2. The percentage of patients who have newlyregistered with the practice on or after December 01 2008whose notes record their ethnicity and first language30 60-90%20 90-100%It is recognised that this indicator set partly overlaps with the existing RECORDS 21 <strong>QOF</strong> Indicatorand also partly overlaps with the recently announced Directed Enhanced Service (DES) forEthnicity for 2009/10 (which provides incentives for collection of data on ethnicity and religion).BackgroundIt is now recognised that health-seeking behaviour, use of health services, and differential accessto health services among different ethnic groups in the UK may explain patterns of ill-health(Hargreaves, 2007).The cultural appropriateness of health-care provision in the UK has been questioned, and there isevidence of inequity in access to services, both at the referral level from GPs and in the quality ofcare offered, which may differ both within individual ethnic groups and between ethnic groupsand the White population (Arai et al., 2002).Through the use of good and robust ethnic group data on patients and service users, the NHS andcouncils will be in a better position to address health inequalities, difficulties in access anddiscrimination experienced by some black and minority ethnic individuals and communities. As aresult, the NHS will be better placed to contribute to national targets and meet local corestandards (DoH, 2007b).51