- Page 1: Towards world class healthcare for
- Page 6 and 7: QOF+ report on breastfeeding ......
- Page 8 and 9: QOF+ report on patient safety .....
- Page 10 and 11: CreditsProject boardJosip CarMiles
- Page 12: AcknowledgementsWe are indebted to
- Page 15 and 16: Executive summaryIntroductionPrevio
- Page 21 and 22: Introduction to QOF+Improving the q
- Page 23 and 24: The Department of Health is current
- Page 25 and 26: QOF indicators may therefore help t
- Page 27 and 28: AimsThis paper describes the design
- Page 29 and 30: Summary of indicatorsHigher thresho
- Page 31 and 32: New clinical QOF+ indicatorsNew ind
- Page 33 and 34: BreastfeedingIndicator+ BREASTFEEDI
- Page 35 and 36: New non-clinical QOF+ indicatorsNew
- Page 37: Patient safety Chapter 13 (p85)Indi
- Page 40 and 41: It is prerequisite that in order to
- Page 42 and 43: Prevalence of conditionThe number o
- Page 44 and 45: Degree of perceived professional co
- Page 46 and 47: ReferencesCholesterol Treatment Tri
- Page 48 and 49: Priority and relevance to national
- Page 50 and 51: Degree of perceived professional co
- Page 52 and 53: Hodgson R, Alwyn T, John B, Thom B,
- Page 54 and 55: Priority and relevance to national
- Page 56 and 57: Health impactThe further incentivis
- Page 59 and 60: QOF+ report onsmoking in pregnancyP
- Page 61 and 62: Evidence to support the proposed in
- Page 63: ReferencesBritish Medical Associati
- Page 66 and 67: Priority and relevance to national
- Page 68 and 69:
The Seven Point Plan for the Protec
- Page 70 and 71:
ReferencesAniansson, G., Alm, B., A
- Page 72 and 73:
The Department of Health states tha
- Page 74 and 75:
Degree of perceived support from pr
- Page 77 and 78:
QOF+ report on recordsProposed indi
- Page 79 and 80:
Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) is an aut
- Page 81 and 82:
Degree of perceived professional co
- Page 83:
References2001 Census web site: htt
- Page 86 and 87:
In 2007 the North West London Secto
- Page 88 and 89:
Workload and training implicationsT
- Page 90 and 91:
Self care has been defined as “th
- Page 92 and 93:
Some refer to a practice website; m
- Page 94 and 95:
Workload and training implicationsI
- Page 96 and 97:
The British Thoracic Society / Scot
- Page 98 and 99:
Continued…Indicator+ PATIENT EXPE
- Page 100 and 101:
The recently published national Pic
- Page 102 and 103:
Degree of perceived professional co
- Page 105 and 106:
QOF+ report onpatient safetyPropose
- Page 107 and 108:
Priority and relevance to national
- Page 109 and 110:
other complex high-technology setti
- Page 111 and 112:
Training and supportrequirements fo
- Page 113 and 114:
As per NICE guidance, all frontline
- Page 115 and 116:
RecordsIt is proposed that the PCT
- Page 117 and 118:
Patient informationDelivery of thes
- Page 119 and 120:
Patient safetyTraining relating to
- Page 121 and 122:
The proposed methodology for select
- Page 123 and 124:
Lower Upper PointsPractices ≥Uppe
- Page 125 and 126:
5-centile step. This lower value is
- Page 127 and 128:
There is, therefore, an outstanding
- Page 129 and 130:
Minimum attainment thresholdsIt was
- Page 131 and 132:
Percentage of practices at or below
- Page 133 and 134:
Exception Reporting Rate (Percentag
- Page 135 and 136:
List turnoverConsultation with prac
- Page 137 and 138:
Using the graphsThe following graph
- Page 139 and 140:
Percentage of practices at or below
- Page 141 and 142:
Percentage of practices at or below
- Page 143 and 144:
Percentage of practices at or below
- Page 145 and 146:
Percentage of practices at or below
- Page 147 and 148:
Percentage of practices at or below
- Page 149 and 150:
Percentage of practices at or below
- Page 151 and 152:
tight timescale of this project, it
- Page 153 and 154:
which additional priority areas wou
- Page 155 and 156:
Consultation with local practicesLo
- Page 157 and 158:
average. It was felt that including
- Page 159 and 160:
A4.10 ReferencesBMA (2006) Revision
- Page 161 and 162:
Results of data analysis of practic
- Page 163:
Additional QOF+ resources and conte