- Page 1:
Towards world class healthcare for
- Page 6 and 7:
QOF+ report on breastfeeding ......
- Page 8 and 9:
QOF+ report on patient safety .....
- Page 10 and 11:
CreditsProject boardJosip CarMiles
- Page 12:
AcknowledgementsWe are indebted to
- Page 15 and 16:
Executive summaryIntroductionPrevio
- Page 18:
Support with QOF+If you have a prob
- Page 22 and 23:
The quality and outcomes framework
- Page 24 and 25:
Effect of measurement on health ine
- Page 26 and 27:
How might a local QOF operate in pr
- Page 28 and 29:
Doran T, Fullwood C, Kontopantelis
- Page 30 and 31:
Continued…QOFQOF+IndicatorUpperTh
- Page 32 and 33:
Alcohol Chapter 4 (p27)IndicatorQOF
- Page 34 and 35:
RecordsIndicator+ PRESCRIPTION 1. T
- Page 36 and 37:
Patient experience Chapter 12 (p77)
- Page 39 and 40:
C3QOF+ report on cardiovasculardise
- Page 41 and 42:
Creation of practice CVD at-risk re
- Page 43 and 44:
achieved through primary prevention
- Page 45 and 46:
Workload and training implicationsI
- Page 47 and 48:
QOF+ report on alcoholProposed indi
- Page 49 and 50:
Local contextThe Hammersmith and Fu
- Page 51 and 52:
Workload and training implicationsR
- Page 53 and 54:
QOF+ report on smokingProposed indi
- Page 55 and 56:
Local context24% of adults (35,000)
- Page 57:
ReferencesBritish Medical Associati
- Page 60 and 61:
The NICE Clinical Guideline on Ante
- Page 62 and 63:
Health impactThere are significant
- Page 65 and 66:
QOF+ report on breastfeedingPropose
- Page 67 and 68:
Local contextIn 2006/7, the percent
- Page 69 and 70:
Degree of perceived professional co
- Page 71 and 72:
QOF+ report on ethnicityProposed In
- Page 73 and 74:
Associated Morbidity and MortalityT
- Page 75:
Workload and training implicationsP
- Page 78 and 79:
Priority and relevance to national
- Page 80 and 81:
Specific reasons for this framework
- Page 82 and 83:
Workload and training implicationsT
- Page 85 and 86:
QOF+ report on newpatient screening
- Page 87 and 88:
Review of evidence to support the p
- Page 89 and 90:
QOF+ report onpatient informationPr
- Page 91 and 92:
Priority and relevance to national
- Page 93 and 94:
Degree of perceived support from pa
- Page 95 and 96: ReferencesCarpenter A and Mayers A
- Page 97 and 98: QOF+ report onpatient experiencePro
- Page 99 and 100: Rosen et al. (2001) categorised ini
- Page 101 and 102: The National 2007 Quality and Outco
- Page 103: ReferencesBaker, R (2007) Quality a
- Page 106 and 107: BackgroundThe United Nations Conven
- Page 108 and 109: In March 2008, a PCT audit of signi
- Page 110 and 111: Impact on health inequalitiesPovert
- Page 112 and 113: Training and support requirements f
- Page 114 and 115: Information on self-directed online
- Page 116 and 117: New patient screeningProposed train
- Page 118 and 119: Patient experienceLearning disabili
- Page 120 and 121: Appendix 1Background to the QOF+ de
- Page 122 and 123: Appendix 2Methodology for the exten
- Page 124 and 125: PrevalenceRegistersizeAsthma 5.75%
- Page 126 and 127: While both threshold types are remu
- Page 128 and 129: The low level of remuneration for c
- Page 130 and 131: Exception reportingMany QOF (and a
- Page 132 and 133: indicators compared to national rat
- Page 134 and 135: 114
- Page 136 and 137: Appendix 3Current levels of attainm
- Page 138 and 139: Percentage of practices at or below
- Page 140 and 141: Percentage of practices at or below
- Page 142 and 143: Percentage of practices at or below
- Page 144 and 145: Percentage of practices at or below
- Page 148 and 149: Percentage of practices at or below
- Page 150 and 151: Appendix 4Methodology for the desig
- Page 152 and 153: As a result of the prioritisation p
- Page 154 and 155: Methodology for the development of
- Page 156 and 157: Assessment of new clinical and reco
- Page 158 and 159: Communication with the PCT’s heal
- Page 160 and 161: Appendix 5Methodology for the devel
- Page 162 and 163: Appendix 6Summary of the QOF+ schem