12.07.2015 Views

QOF Plus Year 1 - Imperial College London

QOF Plus Year 1 - Imperial College London

QOF Plus Year 1 - Imperial College London

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Percentage of practices at or below given rate of exceptingNumber of H&F practices at or below given rate of exceptingException reporting patterns in Hammersmith and FulhamThe metric used to report exception reporting here is that published by the NHS InformationCentre: the effective exception rate, . The for a given practice or group of practices iscalculated by summing all the exception counts across all numeric indicators , and dividing thisinto the sum of the [denominator + exception counts]:∑ ∑(9)∑ (∑ ( ))While dealing with absolute numbers of exceptions rather than averaging reported ratesminimises the skew caused by practices with small numbers of patients, it also disproportionatelyweights large-denominator indicators (e.g. CS 1), and this should be kept in mind while reviewingthe figures. Those quoted here are derived from <strong>QOF</strong> 07/08 data. They differ slightly from thosepublished by the Information Centre because we disagree with their practice of assuming thatunreported data should be equivalent to an exception rate of zero for a given practice-indicator.Our view is more conservative (practice-indicators without a stated exception rate are simplyomitted) and yields a pessimistic upper bound on exception reporting.100%90%80%National <strong>QOF</strong> 07/08H&F June 083028262470%60%50%40%30%20%10%2220181614121086420%00.1% 0.5% 1.0% 5.0% 10.0% 50.0% 100.0%Exception reporting rateMediansFigure A2.7Cumulative distribution plot comparing rates of exception reporting in NHS Hammersmith and Fulham(June 2008 data, solid red line) with national rates (<strong>QOF</strong> 07/08 data, dotted purple line) for the 12 <strong>QOF</strong>indicators subject to <strong>QOF</strong>+ incentivisation. Data sourced from QMAS and the NHS Information Centre.The EER in national <strong>QOF</strong> 07/08 was 6.08% for all indicators and 7.50% when the 12 clinicalindicators included in <strong>QOF</strong>+ are considered in isolation. Hammersmith and Fulham’s rates are6.01% and 6.12%, respectively, ranking it 75 th and 9 th lowest for exception reporting by PCTnationally. Compared to <strong>London</strong> PCTs (EER 6.43% and 7.81%) Hammersmith and Fulham currentlyranks 8 th and 2 nd lowest. The cumulative distribution of exception reporting for the 12 clinical111

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!