- Page 1: Towards world class healthcare for
- Page 6 and 7: QOF+ report on breastfeeding ......
- Page 8 and 9: QOF+ report on patient safety .....
- Page 12: AcknowledgementsWe are indebted to
- Page 15 and 16: Executive summaryIntroductionPrevio
- Page 18: Support with QOF+If you have a prob
- Page 22 and 23: The quality and outcomes framework
- Page 24 and 25: Effect of measurement on health ine
- Page 26 and 27: How might a local QOF operate in pr
- Page 28 and 29: Doran T, Fullwood C, Kontopantelis
- Page 30 and 31: Continued…QOFQOF+IndicatorUpperTh
- Page 32 and 33: Alcohol Chapter 4 (p27)IndicatorQOF
- Page 34 and 35: RecordsIndicator+ PRESCRIPTION 1. T
- Page 36 and 37: Patient experience Chapter 12 (p77)
- Page 39 and 40: C3QOF+ report on cardiovasculardise
- Page 41 and 42: Creation of practice CVD at-risk re
- Page 43 and 44: achieved through primary prevention
- Page 45 and 46: Workload and training implicationsI
- Page 47 and 48: QOF+ report on alcoholProposed indi
- Page 49 and 50: Local contextThe Hammersmith and Fu
- Page 51 and 52: Workload and training implicationsR
- Page 53 and 54: QOF+ report on smokingProposed indi
- Page 55 and 56: Local context24% of adults (35,000)
- Page 57: ReferencesBritish Medical Associati
- Page 60 and 61:
The NICE Clinical Guideline on Ante
- Page 62 and 63:
Health impactThere are significant
- Page 65 and 66:
QOF+ report on breastfeedingPropose
- Page 67 and 68:
Local contextIn 2006/7, the percent
- Page 69 and 70:
Degree of perceived professional co
- Page 71 and 72:
QOF+ report on ethnicityProposed In
- Page 73 and 74:
Associated Morbidity and MortalityT
- Page 75:
Workload and training implicationsP
- Page 78 and 79:
Priority and relevance to national
- Page 80 and 81:
Specific reasons for this framework
- Page 82 and 83:
Workload and training implicationsT
- Page 85 and 86:
QOF+ report on newpatient screening
- Page 87 and 88:
Review of evidence to support the p
- Page 89 and 90:
QOF+ report onpatient informationPr
- Page 91 and 92:
Priority and relevance to national
- Page 93 and 94:
Degree of perceived support from pa
- Page 95 and 96:
ReferencesCarpenter A and Mayers A
- Page 97 and 98:
QOF+ report onpatient experiencePro
- Page 99 and 100:
Rosen et al. (2001) categorised ini
- Page 101 and 102:
The National 2007 Quality and Outco
- Page 103:
ReferencesBaker, R (2007) Quality a
- Page 106 and 107:
BackgroundThe United Nations Conven
- Page 108 and 109:
In March 2008, a PCT audit of signi
- Page 110 and 111:
Impact on health inequalitiesPovert
- Page 112 and 113:
Training and support requirements f
- Page 114 and 115:
Information on self-directed online
- Page 116 and 117:
New patient screeningProposed train
- Page 118 and 119:
Patient experienceLearning disabili
- Page 120 and 121:
Appendix 1Background to the QOF+ de
- Page 122 and 123:
Appendix 2Methodology for the exten
- Page 124 and 125:
PrevalenceRegistersizeAsthma 5.75%
- Page 126 and 127:
While both threshold types are remu
- Page 128 and 129:
The low level of remuneration for c
- Page 130 and 131:
Exception reportingMany QOF (and a
- Page 132 and 133:
indicators compared to national rat
- Page 134 and 135:
114
- Page 136 and 137:
Appendix 3Current levels of attainm
- Page 138 and 139:
Percentage of practices at or below
- Page 140 and 141:
Percentage of practices at or below
- Page 142 and 143:
Percentage of practices at or below
- Page 144 and 145:
Percentage of practices at or below
- Page 146 and 147:
Percentage of practices at or below
- Page 148 and 149:
Percentage of practices at or below
- Page 150 and 151:
Appendix 4Methodology for the desig
- Page 152 and 153:
As a result of the prioritisation p
- Page 154 and 155:
Methodology for the development of
- Page 156 and 157:
Assessment of new clinical and reco
- Page 158 and 159:
Communication with the PCT’s heal
- Page 160 and 161:
Appendix 5Methodology for the devel
- Page 162 and 163:
Appendix 6Summary of the QOF+ schem