QOF Plus Year 1 - Imperial College London
QOF Plus Year 1 - Imperial College London QOF Plus Year 1 - Imperial College London
BackgroundThe United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC) states that all children have aright to be protected from “physical or mental violence, injury or abuse, neglect, maltreatment orexploitation including sexual abuse, while in the care of parent(s), legal guardian(s) or any otherperson who has the care of the child” (Article 19).The proposed indicators relating to child protection have been derived from SafeguardingChildren and Young People in General Practice: A Toolkit, which aims to equip practices with theknowledge and tools to integrate safeguarding children and young people into practice systemsand processes.Child protection is the term used to refer to the activity taken to protect children who aresuffering or at risk of suffering significant harm.A vulnerable adult is a person aged 18 years or over “who is or may be in need of community careservices by reason of mental or other disability, age or illness; and who is or may be unable totake care of him or herself, or unable to protect him or herself against significant harm orexploitation” (DoH, 2000).The publication ‘No Secrets’ (DoH, 2000) states that “in recent years several serious incidentshave demonstrated the need for immediate action to ensure that vulnerable adults, who are atrisk of abuse, receive protection and support.” The publication highlights the need for thecreation of“…a framework for action within which all responsible agencies work together to ensurea coherent policy for the protection of vulnerable adults at risk of abuse and a consistentand effective response to any circumstances giving ground for concern or formalcomplaints or expressions of anxiety. The agencies’ primary aim should be to preventabuse where possible but, if the preventive strategy fails, agencies should ensure thatrobust procedures are in place for dealing with incidents of abuse.”Within existing QOF practices are expected to carry out a minimum number of significant eventaudits (SEA) each year. The purpose of this is to support reflective practice and to ensurechanges are made were necessary to reduce the likelihood of problems recurring.PCTs and hospital trusts now routinely report patient safety incidents via the National Reportingand Learning System (NRLS). This system saves anonymised data from incident reports with theaim of recognising recurrent patterns and feedback learning nationally. The system relies on acritical mass of incident reports being received.86
Priority and relevance to national policyExamples of national legislation and policy relating to safeguarding children, young people andvulnerable adults (including partnership working) include: Children Act 1989United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child(ratified by UK Government in 1991) Human Rights Act 1998 Protection of Children Act 1999 Health and Social Care Act 2001 Adoption and Children Act 2002 Sexual Offences Act 2003 Children Act 2004Working Together to Safeguard Children 2006/Working Together under the Children Act2004 (2006)/Protecting Children- a shared responsibility (1998) Safeguarding Vulnerable Groups Act 2006Recent guidance produced by the National Patient Safety Agency (Bowie and Pringle, 2008)addresses the importance of Significant Event Analyses, including those relating to near missesinvolving potential harm to patients, and of sharing this information with Primary Care Trusts andthe NPSA in order to enable lessons to be shared with others.Achievement of these indicators would provide practice assurance of the following HealthcareCommission core standards: C1a, C2, C5d, C7a, C7c, C11a and C20a.Local contextThe number of children on the child protection register in Hammersmith and Fulham rose from70 in February 2006 to 139 by March 2007. The main reasons for registration continue to beneglect and emotional abuse. Information is collated at case conferences regarding family issues.For the period December 2006 – February 2007 there were 133 conferences. Domestic Violencewas a factor in 42% of all cases. Other factors that are significant are substance misuse andmental health issues (Hammersmith and Fulham Child Protection Annual Report 2006/7).The proposed indicators relating to child protection are in concordance with therecommendations of Hammersmith and Fulham Child Protection Annual Report 2006/7. They aredesigned to strengthen record-keeping and cross-organisational communication in relation tochild protection, which have been identified locally as an area for action, and to embed a systemof regular CRB checks for practice staff.A multi-agency policy and related procedures for the protection of vulnerable adults has beenproduced by the the local social services department and partner agencies to protect vulnerableadults in the borough (LBHF Social Services Department, 2006).87
- Page 55 and 56: Local context24% of adults (35,000)
- Page 57: ReferencesBritish Medical Associati
- Page 60 and 61: The NICE Clinical Guideline on Ante
- Page 62 and 63: Health impactThere are significant
- Page 65 and 66: QOF+ report on breastfeedingPropose
- Page 67 and 68: Local contextIn 2006/7, the percent
- Page 69 and 70: Degree of perceived professional co
- Page 71 and 72: QOF+ report on ethnicityProposed In
- Page 73 and 74: Associated Morbidity and MortalityT
- Page 75: Workload and training implicationsP
- Page 78 and 79: Priority and relevance to national
- Page 80 and 81: Specific reasons for this framework
- Page 82 and 83: Workload and training implicationsT
- Page 85 and 86: QOF+ report on newpatient screening
- Page 87 and 88: Review of evidence to support the p
- Page 89 and 90: QOF+ report onpatient informationPr
- Page 91 and 92: Priority and relevance to national
- Page 93 and 94: Degree of perceived support from pa
- Page 95 and 96: ReferencesCarpenter A and Mayers A
- Page 97 and 98: QOF+ report onpatient experiencePro
- Page 99 and 100: Rosen et al. (2001) categorised ini
- Page 101 and 102: The National 2007 Quality and Outco
- Page 103: ReferencesBaker, R (2007) Quality a
- Page 108 and 109: In March 2008, a PCT audit of signi
- Page 110 and 111: Impact on health inequalitiesPovert
- Page 112 and 113: Training and support requirements f
- Page 114 and 115: Information on self-directed online
- Page 116 and 117: New patient screeningProposed train
- Page 118 and 119: Patient experienceLearning disabili
- Page 120 and 121: Appendix 1Background to the QOF+ de
- Page 122 and 123: Appendix 2Methodology for the exten
- Page 124 and 125: PrevalenceRegistersizeAsthma 5.75%
- Page 126 and 127: While both threshold types are remu
- Page 128 and 129: The low level of remuneration for c
- Page 130 and 131: Exception reportingMany QOF (and a
- Page 132 and 133: indicators compared to national rat
- Page 134 and 135: 114
- Page 136 and 137: Appendix 3Current levels of attainm
- Page 138 and 139: Percentage of practices at or below
- Page 140 and 141: Percentage of practices at or below
- Page 142 and 143: Percentage of practices at or below
- Page 144 and 145: Percentage of practices at or below
- Page 146 and 147: Percentage of practices at or below
- Page 148 and 149: Percentage of practices at or below
- Page 150 and 151: Appendix 4Methodology for the desig
- Page 152 and 153: As a result of the prioritisation p
- Page 154 and 155: Methodology for the development of
BackgroundThe United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC) states that all children have aright to be protected from “physical or mental violence, injury or abuse, neglect, maltreatment orexploitation including sexual abuse, while in the care of parent(s), legal guardian(s) or any otherperson who has the care of the child” (Article 19).The proposed indicators relating to child protection have been derived from SafeguardingChildren and Young People in General Practice: A Toolkit, which aims to equip practices with theknowledge and tools to integrate safeguarding children and young people into practice systemsand processes.Child protection is the term used to refer to the activity taken to protect children who aresuffering or at risk of suffering significant harm.A vulnerable adult is a person aged 18 years or over “who is or may be in need of community careservices by reason of mental or other disability, age or illness; and who is or may be unable totake care of him or herself, or unable to protect him or herself against significant harm orexploitation” (DoH, 2000).The publication ‘No Secrets’ (DoH, 2000) states that “in recent years several serious incidentshave demonstrated the need for immediate action to ensure that vulnerable adults, who are atrisk of abuse, receive protection and support.” The publication highlights the need for thecreation of“…a framework for action within which all responsible agencies work together to ensurea coherent policy for the protection of vulnerable adults at risk of abuse and a consistentand effective response to any circumstances giving ground for concern or formalcomplaints or expressions of anxiety. The agencies’ primary aim should be to preventabuse where possible but, if the preventive strategy fails, agencies should ensure thatrobust procedures are in place for dealing with incidents of abuse.”Within existing <strong>QOF</strong> practices are expected to carry out a minimum number of significant eventaudits (SEA) each year. The purpose of this is to support reflective practice and to ensurechanges are made were necessary to reduce the likelihood of problems recurring.PCTs and hospital trusts now routinely report patient safety incidents via the National Reportingand Learning System (NRLS). This system saves anonymised data from incident reports with theaim of recognising recurrent patterns and feedback learning nationally. The system relies on acritical mass of incident reports being received.86