QOF Plus Year 1 - Imperial College London
QOF Plus Year 1 - Imperial College London QOF Plus Year 1 - Imperial College London
The recently published national Picker Institute survey of patient satisfaction with GP serviceshighlighted the many positive aspects of the patient experience. The majority of Hammersmithand Fulham patients reported that:69% could pre-plan or get an appointment within 2 working days,60% were seen within 15 minutes of their appointment time,76% thought the doctor listened carefully to what they had to say,66% thought they had enough time with the doctor,56% thought they were involved as much as they wanted to be in decision about theircare and treatment,66% had confidence and trust in their doctor and 89% felt they were treated with respectand dignity,71% thought the doctor knew enough about their condition/treatment, and58% thought that the main reason for their visit to a practice had been dealt with to theirsatisfaction.Most patients are highly appreciative of the care they receive. However, the survey resultshighlight that there is also room for improving the patient experience. The Picker Institute uses asimple summary score to show where patients think there is a problem or room for improvementregarding a specific aspect of care. Hammersmith and Fulham scored worse than the nationalaverage in 2 particular categories: ‘Making an Appointment’ and ‘Seeing a Doctor’. While thenational survey is a useful high level tool it does not allow analysis of individual practiceperformance and for this reason the plan is to carry out a local version of this survey. It isproposed that the PCT involves practices in innovative interactive feedback sessions resulting inindividual plans for addressing areas of concern.Review of evidence to support the proposed indicatorsPatient surveysA review by Coulter et al. (2006) concludes that direct and indirect feedback from patients is seenas a means of stimulating quality improvements, and that one of the main ways in whichfeedback can be obtained is through patient surveys.Patient surveys generally show relatively high levels of satisfaction with primary care. However, areview by Coulter (2006) of findings of patient surveys in six countries has shown that patientengagement tends to be lower in the United Kingdom (the comparison countries were the UnitedStates (US), Australia, Canada, New Zealand and Germany). This review found that doctors in theUK were reported as less likely than doctors in other countries to involve patients in decisionmaking,to give information on self-help or self-management, or to give information about theside-effects of medication.The two currently approved patient survey instruments (IPQ and GPAQ) have several limitationsand have not been designed to address important areas such as engagement and continuity.80
The National 2007 Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF) Report on Patient Experiencehighlights that “having undertaken an annual survey for several years with the same instruments,many practices have stopped learning anything new about the experience of their patients. Theprocess has therefore become, for at least some practices, a relatively sterile and routine processwith little or no benefit for patients” (Baker, 2007).The report further states that“If the goal is to promote improvement in patient experience through rewardingpractices according to patient survey results, or by creating competition throughpublication of comparative performance data, the development of a standard nationalsurvey that enables comparison between practices would be needed. Evidence wouldalso be needed to show how patient characteristics influence ratings.”This evidence is currently lacking, and an appropriate national survey has not yet been developedsuitable for use as part of QOF.In view of this, the proposed indicators are designed instead to promote genuine patientengagement within practices enabling practices to better understand and respond to patientexperiences of care.The Picker General Practice questionnaire is based on the Primary Care Trust (PCT) questionnaire,developed by Picker Institute Europe for use in the NHS Patient Survey Programme. The localversion of the Picker Institute survey has been selected in order to take account of the concernsof local patients.It is proposed that practices should make the survey results available to practice patients, andalso to discus the findings with the PCT in order to produce an action plan. This approach issupported by the conclusions and recommendations of the Department of Health’s recentlypublished report, ‘No Patient Left Behind’ (Lakhani, 2008).Availability of long appointment slots for patients who require interpreting or signingsupport or for those with learning disabilitiesFor patients with particular needs or problems, e.g. those whose first language is not English orthose who need signing support or who have a learning disability, the availability of longerappointments can improve the quality of clinical care provided for patients in these groups. Theproposed patient experience indicators are designed to help address issues raised in the ‘Nopatient left behind’ report (Lakhani, 2008) which highlighted particularly how communicationdifficulties impact on the overall quality of care received by Black and Minority Ethnic (BME)patients, and also has implications for patient safety.Carers of people with learning disabilitiesPeople with learning disabilities typically do not seek out health care. They also experiencebarriers in accessing appropriate services and support for their health needs, health promotionneeds and lifestyle choices. Carers therefore play a potentially crucial role in the lives andexperiences of these patients. Carers are unpaid for their caring role, and they may havesignificant health and financial consequences as a result of their role. These consequences maybe further compounded if the carer is from a disadvantaged group.81
- Page 49 and 50: Local contextThe Hammersmith and Fu
- Page 51 and 52: Workload and training implicationsR
- Page 53 and 54: QOF+ report on smokingProposed indi
- Page 55 and 56: Local context24% of adults (35,000)
- Page 57: ReferencesBritish Medical Associati
- Page 60 and 61: The NICE Clinical Guideline on Ante
- Page 62 and 63: Health impactThere are significant
- Page 65 and 66: QOF+ report on breastfeedingPropose
- Page 67 and 68: Local contextIn 2006/7, the percent
- Page 69 and 70: Degree of perceived professional co
- Page 71 and 72: QOF+ report on ethnicityProposed In
- Page 73 and 74: Associated Morbidity and MortalityT
- Page 75: Workload and training implicationsP
- Page 78 and 79: Priority and relevance to national
- Page 80 and 81: Specific reasons for this framework
- Page 82 and 83: Workload and training implicationsT
- Page 85 and 86: QOF+ report on newpatient screening
- Page 87 and 88: Review of evidence to support the p
- Page 89 and 90: QOF+ report onpatient informationPr
- Page 91 and 92: Priority and relevance to national
- Page 93 and 94: Degree of perceived support from pa
- Page 95 and 96: ReferencesCarpenter A and Mayers A
- Page 97 and 98: QOF+ report onpatient experiencePro
- Page 99: Rosen et al. (2001) categorised ini
- Page 103: ReferencesBaker, R (2007) Quality a
- Page 106 and 107: BackgroundThe United Nations Conven
- Page 108 and 109: In March 2008, a PCT audit of signi
- Page 110 and 111: Impact on health inequalitiesPovert
- Page 112 and 113: Training and support requirements f
- Page 114 and 115: Information on self-directed online
- Page 116 and 117: New patient screeningProposed train
- Page 118 and 119: Patient experienceLearning disabili
- Page 120 and 121: Appendix 1Background to the QOF+ de
- Page 122 and 123: Appendix 2Methodology for the exten
- Page 124 and 125: PrevalenceRegistersizeAsthma 5.75%
- Page 126 and 127: While both threshold types are remu
- Page 128 and 129: The low level of remuneration for c
- Page 130 and 131: Exception reportingMany QOF (and a
- Page 132 and 133: indicators compared to national rat
- Page 134 and 135: 114
- Page 136 and 137: Appendix 3Current levels of attainm
- Page 138 and 139: Percentage of practices at or below
- Page 140 and 141: Percentage of practices at or below
- Page 142 and 143: Percentage of practices at or below
- Page 144 and 145: Percentage of practices at or below
- Page 146 and 147: Percentage of practices at or below
- Page 148 and 149: Percentage of practices at or below
The recently published national Picker Institute survey of patient satisfaction with GP serviceshighlighted the many positive aspects of the patient experience. The majority of Hammersmithand Fulham patients reported that:69% could pre-plan or get an appointment within 2 working days,60% were seen within 15 minutes of their appointment time,76% thought the doctor listened carefully to what they had to say,66% thought they had enough time with the doctor,56% thought they were involved as much as they wanted to be in decision about theircare and treatment,66% had confidence and trust in their doctor and 89% felt they were treated with respectand dignity,71% thought the doctor knew enough about their condition/treatment, and58% thought that the main reason for their visit to a practice had been dealt with to theirsatisfaction.Most patients are highly appreciative of the care they receive. However, the survey resultshighlight that there is also room for improving the patient experience. The Picker Institute uses asimple summary score to show where patients think there is a problem or room for improvementregarding a specific aspect of care. Hammersmith and Fulham scored worse than the nationalaverage in 2 particular categories: ‘Making an Appointment’ and ‘Seeing a Doctor’. While thenational survey is a useful high level tool it does not allow analysis of individual practiceperformance and for this reason the plan is to carry out a local version of this survey. It isproposed that the PCT involves practices in innovative interactive feedback sessions resulting inindividual plans for addressing areas of concern.Review of evidence to support the proposed indicatorsPatient surveysA review by Coulter et al. (2006) concludes that direct and indirect feedback from patients is seenas a means of stimulating quality improvements, and that one of the main ways in whichfeedback can be obtained is through patient surveys.Patient surveys generally show relatively high levels of satisfaction with primary care. However, areview by Coulter (2006) of findings of patient surveys in six countries has shown that patientengagement tends to be lower in the United Kingdom (the comparison countries were the UnitedStates (US), Australia, Canada, New Zealand and Germany). This review found that doctors in theUK were reported as less likely than doctors in other countries to involve patients in decisionmaking,to give information on self-help or self-management, or to give information about theside-effects of medication.The two currently approved patient survey instruments (IPQ and GPAQ) have several limitationsand have not been designed to address important areas such as engagement and continuity.80