12.07.2015 Views

Innovation Canada: A Call to Action

Innovation Canada: A Call to Action

Innovation Canada: A Call to Action

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Program EffectivenessBox 5.1 Operating Principles of the Proposed IndustrialResearch and <strong>Innovation</strong> Council1. Be mandated <strong>to</strong> stimulate Canadian economic growth and <strong>to</strong> foster a culture ofinnovation by encouraging and supporting business innovation in <strong>Canada</strong> through anoptimal mix of programs.2. Provide a single point of contact for Canadian businesses seeking <strong>to</strong> undertakeR&D/innovation activities, and guide business “clients” <strong>to</strong> the program and serviceproviders that best meet the timelines and supports that the industry client needs. Thiswill reduce the confusion of multiple points of entry.3. Be industry sec<strong>to</strong>r agnostic and emphasize that innovation occurs in all sec<strong>to</strong>rs of theeconomy, in urban and rural areas, and within micro, small, medium and largeCanadian companies, and that innovation can be enabled by talent from a range ofservice providers.4. Work collaboratively with businesses, the federal and provincial governments as wellas the Canadian research community <strong>to</strong> design new programs and remove existingbarriers and impediments in order <strong>to</strong> improve <strong>Canada</strong>’s commercialization outputs,competitiveness and productivity. Encourage, as appropriate, cross-sec<strong>to</strong>r,cross-platform, cross-disciplinary collaboration.5. Use common definitions, a common program/project application form, and offer clearand consistent advice <strong>to</strong> Canadian business from coast <strong>to</strong> coast.6. Enable and encourage novel program design and delivery. Where appropriate, solici<strong>to</strong>utside program delivery agents through a competitive process designed <strong>to</strong> maximizeprogram outcomes. In such cases, IRIC must ensure clear lines of accountability withthese delivery agents, allowing them <strong>to</strong> compete and avoiding any conflict of interestin which IRIC competes with delivery agents for program funding.7. Require that businesses put “skin in the game” for programs/projects commensuratewith the level of return <strong>to</strong> the partner. Generally, as projects are further downstream<strong>to</strong>ward the market in the innovation chain, businesses must be required <strong>to</strong> increase theproportion of their own investment.8. Maintain an uncompromising focus on quality. Where appropriate, peer review shouldbe used <strong>to</strong> determine research funding <strong>to</strong> ensure that the right problem and audienceare being targeted with the right methodology.9. Respect stakeholder timelines and commitments. For example, peer review processesmust be designed <strong>to</strong> ensure against protracted delays in either starting projects orreleasing business contributions.10. Track, measure and report <strong>to</strong> the proposed <strong>Innovation</strong> Advisory Committee (IAC,described in Chapter 8) and the public on outcomes and indica<strong>to</strong>rs for all businessfacingR&D programs offered by the Government of <strong>Canada</strong>. Where needed, developnew metrics, approved by the IAC, and keep a scorecard of performance. Create linesof accountability <strong>to</strong> the IAC for program outcomes and delivery.5-11

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!