Innovation Canada: A Call to Action
Innovation Canada: A Call to Action Innovation Canada: A Call to Action
Innovation Canada: A Call to ActionFigure 5.3 Program from Which Funding Received“In the last three fiscal years, from which program did your firm receive fundingor support from the federal government in relation to business R&D?”[Open ended - multiple responses accepted]Scientific Research and ExperimentalDevelopment Program73%Industrial Research Assistance Program17%Western Diversification Programdelivered by Western Economic Diversification CanadaNSERC university–business partnership programSustainable Development Technology Canada’sSD Tech FundAtlantic Innovation Fund delivered bythe Atlantic Canada Opportunities AgencyMITACSNational Research Council program1%1%1%1%1%1%Other5%Did not know/no response14%0 20 40 60 80 100Percentn = 488Source: Results from a survey of firms conducted for the Panel by EKOS Research Associates Inc., 2011.improve the impact of federal direct supportprograms for business innovation. Of foremostimportance, the Government of Canada mustbuild a focal point for direct supportprogramming — a new funding and deliveryagency for business innovation support.5-8
Program EffectivenessFigure 5.4 Satisfaction with Various Aspects of the Program“For this same program, please rate your firm’s satisfaction withdifferent aspects of the program.”Overall quality of program deliveryForm of supportConditions on eligibility to receive supportEligible expensesLength of time between decisionand receipt of fundsSkills and expertise for the assessment of projectAmount of supportReporting requirements for firmLength of time between application and decisionSelection process3 6 176 7 163 11 182 13 192 13 228 8 234 13 222 12 273 16 2316 5 22747168666361615958560 20 40 60 80 100PercentDid not know/no response Not satisfied (1–2) Neither (3) Satisfied (4–5)n = 488Source: Results from a survey of firms conducted for the Panel by EKOS Research Associates Inc., 2011.Recommendation 1Create an Industrial Research andInnovation Council (IRIC), with aclear business innovation mandate(including delivery of business-facinginnovation programs, developmentof a business innovation talentstrategy, and other duties overtime), and enhance the impact ofprograms through consolidationand improved whole-of-governmentevaluation.The Vision of the PanelFederal programs to foster business innovationmust play the central role in the government’sstrategy to boost Canada’s lagging productivitygrowth so as to ensure ongoing prosperity forCanadians. Programs to promote businessinnovation should be designed to address aspecific problem for which a governmentinitiative is needed as part of the solution.They should have a scale appropriate for theproblem at hand, be well known to business, beeasy and timely to access and use, be deliveredin coordination with other federal and provincialinitiatives, and have clear performance measuresto track progress and success.5-9
- Page 30 and 31: Innovation Canada: A Call to Action
- Page 32 and 33: Innovation Canada: A Call to Action
- Page 35 and 36: The Context of the ReviewChapterThe
- Page 37 and 38: The Context of the Reviewspreads wi
- Page 39 and 40: The Context of the ReviewBox 2.2 De
- Page 41 and 42: The Context of the ReviewIn absolut
- Page 43 and 44: The Context of the ReviewInnovation
- Page 45 and 46: The Context of the Reviewdevelopmen
- Page 47 and 48: The Context of the ReviewBox 2.4 Wh
- Page 49 and 50: The Context of the ReviewProsperity
- Page 51 and 52: The Context of the ReviewFigure 2.6
- Page 53: The Context of the Review%115110105
- Page 56 and 57: Innovation Canada: A Call to Action
- Page 58 and 59: Innovation Canada: A Call to Action
- Page 60 and 61: Innovation Canada: A Call to Action
- Page 62 and 63: Innovation Canada: A Call to Action
- Page 64 and 65: Innovation Canada: A Call to Action
- Page 66 and 67: Innovation Canada: A Call to Action
- Page 69 and 70: Vision and PrinciplesChapterVision
- Page 71 and 72: Vision and Principlesout in Chapter
- Page 73 and 74: Program EffectivenessChapterProgram
- Page 75 and 76: Program Effectivenessand processes.
- Page 77 and 78: Program Effectivenessfull spectrum
- Page 79: Program EffectivenessFigure 5.2 Rea
- Page 83 and 84: Program EffectivenessBox 5.1 Operat
- Page 85 and 86: Program Effectivenessassessment of
- Page 87 and 88: Program EffectivenessFigure 5.5 Dir
- Page 89 and 90: Program EffectivenessFigure 5.6 Per
- Page 91 and 92: Program Mix and DesignChapterProgra
- Page 93 and 94: Program Mix and DesignBox 6.1 Direc
- Page 95 and 96: Program Mix and Designthe needs of
- Page 97 and 98: Program Mix and DesignFigure 6.3 Ta
- Page 99 and 100: Program Mix and DesignBox 6.3 Stack
- Page 101 and 102: Program Mix and Designcapital costs
- Page 103 and 104: Program Mix and Designportion of th
- Page 105 and 106: Filling the GapsChapterFilling the
- Page 107 and 108: Filling the GapsBox 7.1 Use of Proc
- Page 109 and 110: Filling the GapsBox 7.2 Canadian In
- Page 111 and 112: Filling the Gapscompetitive levels,
- Page 113 and 114: Filling the GapsBox 7.4 Institutes
- Page 115 and 116: Filling the GapsThe budgetary impli
- Page 117 and 118: Filling the GapsSuch concerns are i
- Page 119 and 120: Filling the GapsAngel InvestmentAt
- Page 121 and 122: Filling the GapsWith the foregoing
- Page 123 and 124: Filling the GapsBearing this in min
- Page 125 and 126: Leadership for InnovationChapterLea
- Page 127 and 128: Leadership for InnovationThe approp
- Page 129 and 130: Leadership for Innovationinnovation
Program EffectivenessFigure 5.4 Satisfaction with Various Aspects of the Program“For this same program, please rate your firm’s satisfaction withdifferent aspects of the program.”Overall quality of program deliveryForm of supportConditions on eligibility <strong>to</strong> receive supportEligible expensesLength of time between decisionand receipt of fundsSkills and expertise for the assessment of projectAmount of supportReporting requirements for firmLength of time between application and decisionSelection process3 6 176 7 163 11 182 13 192 13 228 8 234 13 222 12 273 16 2316 5 22747168666361615958560 20 40 60 80 100PercentDid not know/no response Not satisfied (1–2) Neither (3) Satisfied (4–5)n = 488Source: Results from a survey of firms conducted for the Panel by EKOS Research Associates Inc., 2011.Recommendation 1Create an Industrial Research and<strong>Innovation</strong> Council (IRIC), with aclear business innovation mandate(including delivery of business-facinginnovation programs, developmen<strong>to</strong>f a business innovation talentstrategy, and other duties overtime), and enhance the impact ofprograms through consolidationand improved whole-of-governmentevaluation.The Vision of the PanelFederal programs <strong>to</strong> foster business innovationmust play the central role in the government’sstrategy <strong>to</strong> boost <strong>Canada</strong>’s lagging productivitygrowth so as <strong>to</strong> ensure ongoing prosperity forCanadians. Programs <strong>to</strong> promote businessinnovation should be designed <strong>to</strong> address aspecific problem for which a governmentinitiative is needed as part of the solution.They should have a scale appropriate for theproblem at hand, be well known <strong>to</strong> business, beeasy and timely <strong>to</strong> access and use, be deliveredin coordination with other federal and provincialinitiatives, and have clear performance measures<strong>to</strong> track progress and success.5-9