Innovation Canada: A Call to Action
Innovation Canada: A Call to Action Innovation Canada: A Call to Action
AcknowledgementsAcknowledgementsSecretariatThe Panel was capably supported in its work bya secretariat comprised of officials from theGovernment of Canada departments withresponsibilities for many of the programs withinthe scope of the review. These officials hadexpertise in aspects of R&D and innovation, andwere seconded to the secretariat for theduration of the review. The secretariat wasresponsible for a range of activities in support ofthe Panel, such as providing strategic advice andanalysis in support of Panel deliberations,organizing the Panel’s consultations, managingits online written submissions process, liaisingwith the 17 Government of Canadadepartments and other entities implicated in thereview, coordinating the travel of Panelmembers, coordinating the Panel’s program ofresearch with external experts, and managingthe review’s logistics, schedule and finances.Iain Stewart was the secretary to the Panel andhead of the secretariat, and was supported bySamuel Millar, the secretariat’s executivedirector. John Lester, Mary Preville and MélanieRobert served as the secretariat’s directors ofresearch, program assessment, andconsultations and communications, respectively.Sarah Charette, David Côté, Thomas Ferguson,Alexandre Hamel and Brandon La Carte servedas policy advisers. Ana Fierro, Gail Gaudreauand Katherine O’Rourke supported the Panel’sadministration and logistics. Gladys Fisherprovided support in financial administration andcontracting.Special AdvisersThe Panel wishes to give its thanks to thefollowing special advisers:Peter Nicholson, who wrote the report withDavid Côté of the secretariat, under thedirection of the PanelAndrei Sulzenko, for his work supporting uson procurement advicePaul Berg Dick, for his work supporting ourunderstanding of the Scientific Research andExperimental Development tax credit.Other ImportantAcknowledgementsThe Panel also wishes to thank andacknowledge the many other individuals andorganizations that contributed to the review.The regional offices of Industry Canada and allof the regional development agencies wereinstrumental in assisting in the domesticconsultations. Similarly, the Canadian missionsto Canberra, Sydney, Singapore, Berlin, Munich,London, the Organisation for EconomicCo-operation and Development (OECD), NewYork and Washington provided essential supportto the Panel’s international fact-finding missions.The governments of Australia, Finland,Germany, Singapore, the United Kingdom andthe United States contributed importantinformation throughout the internationalconsultation process.v
- Page 1 and 2: Innovation Canada:A Call to ActionR
- Page 3 and 4: Innovation Canada:A Call to Action
- Page 5: Dear Minister,Please find attached
- Page 9 and 10: ContentsContentsExecutive Summary .
- Page 11 and 12: ContentsList of Figures1.1 Canadian
- Page 13 and 14: ContentsGDPGERDGOVERDHERDIACICICTIP
- Page 15 and 16: Executive SummaryExecutive SummaryI
- Page 17 and 18: Executive Summaryprovide a national
- Page 19 and 20: Executive SummaryGuiding Principles
- Page 21 and 22: Executive SummaryApproach to Our Ma
- Page 23 and 24: Executive SummaryRecommendation 1Cr
- Page 25 and 26: Executive SummaryReview Panel and t
- Page 27 and 28: Executive SummaryRecommendation 5He
- Page 29 and 30: Motivation and MandateChapterMotiva
- Page 31 and 32: Motivation and MandateFigure 1.1 Ca
- Page 33: Motivation and Mandatethis review.
- Page 36 and 37: Innovation Canada: A Call to Action
- Page 38 and 39: Innovation Canada: A Call to Action
- Page 40 and 41: Innovation Canada: A Call to Action
- Page 42 and 43: Innovation Canada: A Call to Action
- Page 44 and 45: Innovation Canada: A Call to Action
- Page 46 and 47: Innovation Canada: A Call to Action
- Page 48 and 49: Innovation Canada: A Call to Action
- Page 50 and 51: Innovation Canada: A Call to Action
- Page 52 and 53: Innovation Canada: A Call to Action
- Page 55 and 56: Overview of Programs to Support Bus
AcknowledgementsAcknowledgementsSecretariatThe Panel was capably supported in its work bya secretariat comprised of officials from theGovernment of <strong>Canada</strong> departments withresponsibilities for many of the programs withinthe scope of the review. These officials hadexpertise in aspects of R&D and innovation, andwere seconded <strong>to</strong> the secretariat for theduration of the review. The secretariat wasresponsible for a range of activities in support ofthe Panel, such as providing strategic advice andanalysis in support of Panel deliberations,organizing the Panel’s consultations, managingits online written submissions process, liaisingwith the 17 Government of <strong>Canada</strong>departments and other entities implicated in thereview, coordinating the travel of Panelmembers, coordinating the Panel’s program ofresearch with external experts, and managingthe review’s logistics, schedule and finances.Iain Stewart was the secretary <strong>to</strong> the Panel andhead of the secretariat, and was supported bySamuel Millar, the secretariat’s executivedirec<strong>to</strong>r. John Lester, Mary Preville and MélanieRobert served as the secretariat’s direc<strong>to</strong>rs ofresearch, program assessment, andconsultations and communications, respectively.Sarah Charette, David Côté, Thomas Ferguson,Alexandre Hamel and Brandon La Carte servedas policy advisers. Ana Fierro, Gail Gaudreauand Katherine O’Rourke supported the Panel’sadministration and logistics. Gladys Fisherprovided support in financial administration andcontracting.Special AdvisersThe Panel wishes <strong>to</strong> give its thanks <strong>to</strong> thefollowing special advisers:Peter Nicholson, who wrote the report withDavid Côté of the secretariat, under thedirection of the PanelAndrei Sulzenko, for his work supporting uson procurement advicePaul Berg Dick, for his work supporting ourunderstanding of the Scientific Research andExperimental Development tax credit.Other ImportantAcknowledgementsThe Panel also wishes <strong>to</strong> thank andacknowledge the many other individuals andorganizations that contributed <strong>to</strong> the review.The regional offices of Industry <strong>Canada</strong> and allof the regional development agencies wereinstrumental in assisting in the domesticconsultations. Similarly, the Canadian missions<strong>to</strong> Canberra, Sydney, Singapore, Berlin, Munich,London, the Organisation for EconomicCo-operation and Development (OECD), NewYork and Washing<strong>to</strong>n provided essential support<strong>to</strong> the Panel’s international fact-finding missions.The governments of Australia, Finland,Germany, Singapore, the United Kingdom andthe United States contributed importantinformation throughout the internationalconsultation process.v