12.07.2015 Views

Innovation Canada: A Call to Action

Innovation Canada: A Call to Action

Innovation Canada: A Call to Action

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Overview of Programs <strong>to</strong> Support Business R&Doverall conclusion about the distribution ofSR&ED claims by region. Subject <strong>to</strong> theseimportant caveats, the Panel’s analysis has shownthat, for the years 2000–07, the estimatedaverage distribution of SR&ED tax expenditure forthe firms operating in a single jurisdictionappears <strong>to</strong> correspond closely with the averageprovincial distribution of BERD — that is, mostlyin Ontario and Quebec, with moderate amountsin the four western provinces and some in theAtlantic provinces.The distribution of the direct expenditure <strong>to</strong>tal ismore nearly in line with provincial populationshares, 6 though with a significantly largerproportion in the Atlantic provinces (about12 percent of direct expenditure comparedwith slightly more than 7 percent of <strong>Canada</strong>’spopulation) and somewhat less than proportionalper capita in British Columbia, Alberta, Mani<strong>to</strong>baand Ontario.Envelope Expenditure by Activity SupportedThe great majority of R&D performed by businessis for “experimental development” (Statistics<strong>Canada</strong> 2009), which the Frascati Manual definesas “systematic work, drawing on existingknowledge gained from research and/or practicalexperience, which is directed <strong>to</strong> producing newmaterials, products or devices, <strong>to</strong> installing newprocesses, systems and services, or <strong>to</strong> improvingsubstantially those already produced or installed”(OECD 2002, p. 30). Allocation of the SR&ED taxcredit, averaged over 2000–07, is estimated <strong>to</strong> bemostly in support of experimental development.Direct expenditure programs were more evenlyspread, with 38 percent of 2010–11 expenditureestimated <strong>to</strong> be in support of experimentaldevelopment, a roughly equal amount of35 percent for applied research, 13 percent forbasic research and 11 percent for“commercialization” (planning, marketing andproduction support, which are not eligible forSR&ED credits). Three percent of direct supportwas not categorized.When direct and indirect programs arecombined, it is estimated that the majority offederal support for business and commerciallyoriented R&D is directed <strong>to</strong> experimentaldevelopment. This activity is usually very close <strong>to</strong>the market and therefore is less conducive <strong>to</strong>collaboration and partnership with other playersin the innovation system. There also appears <strong>to</strong>be less spillover <strong>to</strong> the economy at large fromthis “close-<strong>to</strong>-market” R&D, the benefit ofwhich is likely <strong>to</strong> be more fully appropriated bythe R&D-performing business than would be thecase for basic and applied research, which isusually more widely shared and also subject <strong>to</strong>more wide-ranging application.6 With the exception of Ontario and Quebec, provinces have a slightly smaller share of BERD relative <strong>to</strong> their share of<strong>Canada</strong>’s population.3-11

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!