Innovation Canada: A Call to Action
Innovation Canada: A Call to Action Innovation Canada: A Call to Action
Innovation Canada: A Call to ActionFigure 3.2 The Largest Direct Expenditure Programs in the Envelope, 2010–1118%16%14%12%10%8%6%4%2%0%Largest 5 programs: 40%of expendituresLargest 15 programs(shown at right): 72%Industrial Research Assistance Program (NRC)Strategic Aerospace and Defence Initiative (IC)Support for FPInnovations (NRCan)Networks of Centres of Excellence (Tri-Council)SD Tech Fund (SDTC)Western Diversification Program (WD)Atlantic Innovation Fund (ACOA)Strategic Project Grants (NSERC)Collaborative Research and Development Grants (NSERC)Business and Regional Growth Program (CED-Q)Centres of Excellence for Commercialization and Research (Tri-Council)Industrial Materials Institute (NRC)Strategic Network Grants (NSERC)Agricultural Bioproducts Innovation Program (AAFC)Institute for Aerospace Research (NRC)0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12% 14% 16% 18%Source: Based on figures provided by departments and agencies.Envelope Expenditure by Form of SupportThe SR&ED tax credit is by far the largestprogram of federal support for business R&D,projected to comprise about 70 percent ofenvelope expenditure (Figure 3.3).In the category of direct expenditure, nonrepayablegrant and contribution programsmake up the largest proportion — $901 millionin 2010–11, or 60 percent of the directexpenditure category. IRAP is by far the largest,with 2010–11 expenditure of $237.3 million,although it should be noted that this reflects asubstantial two-year increase in budget as partof the government’s stimulus program. (IRAPexpenditure in each of 2007–08 and 2008–09was about $86 million, or only a little more thana third of its 2010–11 budget, and about8–9 percent of direct expenditure in thoseyears.) There is a total of 29 programs orprogram components in the non-repayablegrant and contribution group.Programs providing repayable contributions aresmaller — $248.7 million in 2010–11, or about17 percent of direct spending. The StrategicAerospace and Defence Initiative (SADI) is thelargest of these programs, with 2010–11expenditure of $112.7 million, although thisannual amount will rise substantially as theprogram ramps up. There are seven programs inthis group, with the remaining total largelydelivered by the regional development agencies(see Figure 3.1).Envelope Expenditure by Type of RecipientFigure 3.4 breaks down total expenditure byrecipient and shows that 81 percent is projectedto go to businesses, with the great majoritymade available through the SR&ED program.Much of the direct support for large businessesis repayable. The allocation of expenditure fromdirect programs in 2010–11 was roughly asfollows: 11 percent to large businesses,26 percent to small businesses, 27 percent to3-8
Overview of Programs to Support Business R&DFigure 3.3 Program Envelope, by Form of Support, 2010–11 a5%1% 6% 1%Tax credit support18%70%Non-repayable grants andcontribution programsRepayable contributionprogramsProcurement programs(contract R&D)Federally-peformed R&Dexpenditure – NRC institutesFederally-peformed R&Dexpenditure – otheraAmounts do not add up due to rounding. The value of tax credit support is a projection for the 2010 taxation year.Source: Based on figures provided by departments and agencies.the academic sector (including students),21 percent to NRC institutes and other federallyperformed R&D, 12 percent to Canadian nonprofits,and 3 percent to “other” recipients(including provincial and municipalgovernments, foreign performers and otherCanadian performers). The breakdown ofindirect expenditure in 2007 — the latest yearfor which a breakdown by recipients is available— was as follows: 56 percent to largebusinesses, 40 percent to small Canadiancontrolledprivate corporations (CCPCs), and4 percent to other businesses, that is, smallnon-CCPCs and CCPCs in expenditure limitphase-out range. 5Envelope Expenditure by SectorFigure 3.5 (at the end of this chapter) lays outthe allocation of both direct and SR&ED taxcredit expenditure across all goods and servicesproducing industries. In the case of the directprograms, a sectoral breakdown is providedfor the $1.5 billion in 2010–11 expenditure.In the case of the SR&ED tax credit, the sectoralallocation of about $3.3 billion is for 2007,the most recent year for which a sectoraldistribution is available. The following are somekey observations around the envelopeexpenditure by sector.Direct expenditure. Direct expenditureprograms, in total, are heavily orientedtoward goods-producing industries (about72 percent), reflecting primarily a focus onmanufacturing. Approximately 27 percentof direct spending programs support servicesproducers, notably the professional, scientificand technical services subsector (about12 percent) and information and culturalindustries (about 5 percent). While direct5 The definitions of small and large businesses used by the SR&ED program and the direct programs are not fullycomparable. In the case of many direct programs, the business’s number of employees is used to define the size of thebusiness. For the purposes of the SR&ED program, a “small CCPC” is one with prior-year taxable income of $500 000 orless and prior-year taxable capital of $10 million or less. These companies receive a refundable tax credit on their first$3 million of eligible expenses.3-9
- Page 12 and 13: Innovation Canada: A Call to Action
- Page 14 and 15: Innovation Canada: A Call to Action
- Page 16 and 17: Innovation Canada: A Call to Action
- Page 18 and 19: Innovation Canada: A Call to Action
- Page 20 and 21: Innovation Canada: A Call to Action
- Page 22 and 23: Innovation Canada: A Call to Action
- Page 24 and 25: Innovation Canada: A Call to Action
- Page 26 and 27: Innovation Canada: A Call to Action
- Page 28 and 29: Innovation Canada: A Call to Action
- Page 30 and 31: Innovation Canada: A Call to Action
- Page 32 and 33: Innovation Canada: A Call to Action
- Page 35 and 36: The Context of the ReviewChapterThe
- Page 37 and 38: The Context of the Reviewspreads wi
- Page 39 and 40: The Context of the ReviewBox 2.2 De
- Page 41 and 42: The Context of the ReviewIn absolut
- Page 43 and 44: The Context of the ReviewInnovation
- Page 45 and 46: The Context of the Reviewdevelopmen
- Page 47 and 48: The Context of the ReviewBox 2.4 Wh
- Page 49 and 50: The Context of the ReviewProsperity
- Page 51 and 52: The Context of the ReviewFigure 2.6
- Page 53: The Context of the Review%115110105
- Page 56 and 57: Innovation Canada: A Call to Action
- Page 58 and 59: Innovation Canada: A Call to Action
- Page 60 and 61: Innovation Canada: A Call to Action
- Page 64 and 65: Innovation Canada: A Call to Action
- Page 66 and 67: Innovation Canada: A Call to Action
- Page 69 and 70: Vision and PrinciplesChapterVision
- Page 71 and 72: Vision and Principlesout in Chapter
- Page 73 and 74: Program EffectivenessChapterProgram
- Page 75 and 76: Program Effectivenessand processes.
- Page 77 and 78: Program Effectivenessfull spectrum
- Page 79 and 80: Program EffectivenessFigure 5.2 Rea
- Page 81 and 82: Program EffectivenessFigure 5.4 Sat
- Page 83 and 84: Program EffectivenessBox 5.1 Operat
- Page 85 and 86: Program Effectivenessassessment of
- Page 87 and 88: Program EffectivenessFigure 5.5 Dir
- Page 89 and 90: Program EffectivenessFigure 5.6 Per
- Page 91 and 92: Program Mix and DesignChapterProgra
- Page 93 and 94: Program Mix and DesignBox 6.1 Direc
- Page 95 and 96: Program Mix and Designthe needs of
- Page 97 and 98: Program Mix and DesignFigure 6.3 Ta
- Page 99 and 100: Program Mix and DesignBox 6.3 Stack
- Page 101 and 102: Program Mix and Designcapital costs
- Page 103 and 104: Program Mix and Designportion of th
- Page 105 and 106: Filling the GapsChapterFilling the
- Page 107 and 108: Filling the GapsBox 7.1 Use of Proc
- Page 109 and 110: Filling the GapsBox 7.2 Canadian In
- Page 111 and 112: Filling the Gapscompetitive levels,
Overview of Programs <strong>to</strong> Support Business R&DFigure 3.3 Program Envelope, by Form of Support, 2010–11 a5%1% 6% 1%Tax credit support18%70%Non-repayable grants andcontribution programsRepayable contributionprogramsProcurement programs(contract R&D)Federally-peformed R&Dexpenditure – NRC institutesFederally-peformed R&Dexpenditure – otheraAmounts do not add up due <strong>to</strong> rounding. The value of tax credit support is a projection for the 2010 taxation year.Source: Based on figures provided by departments and agencies.the academic sec<strong>to</strong>r (including students),21 percent <strong>to</strong> NRC institutes and other federallyperformed R&D, 12 percent <strong>to</strong> Canadian nonprofits,and 3 percent <strong>to</strong> “other” recipients(including provincial and municipalgovernments, foreign performers and otherCanadian performers). The breakdown ofindirect expenditure in 2007 — the latest yearfor which a breakdown by recipients is available— was as follows: 56 percent <strong>to</strong> largebusinesses, 40 percent <strong>to</strong> small Canadiancontrolledprivate corporations (CCPCs), and4 percent <strong>to</strong> other businesses, that is, smallnon-CCPCs and CCPCs in expenditure limitphase-out range. 5Envelope Expenditure by Sec<strong>to</strong>rFigure 3.5 (at the end of this chapter) lays outthe allocation of both direct and SR&ED taxcredit expenditure across all goods and servicesproducing industries. In the case of the directprograms, a sec<strong>to</strong>ral breakdown is providedfor the $1.5 billion in 2010–11 expenditure.In the case of the SR&ED tax credit, the sec<strong>to</strong>ralallocation of about $3.3 billion is for 2007,the most recent year for which a sec<strong>to</strong>raldistribution is available. The following are somekey observations around the envelopeexpenditure by sec<strong>to</strong>r.Direct expenditure. Direct expenditureprograms, in <strong>to</strong>tal, are heavily oriented<strong>to</strong>ward goods-producing industries (about72 percent), reflecting primarily a focus onmanufacturing. Approximately 27 percen<strong>to</strong>f direct spending programs support servicesproducers, notably the professional, scientificand technical services subsec<strong>to</strong>r (about12 percent) and information and culturalindustries (about 5 percent). While direct5 The definitions of small and large businesses used by the SR&ED program and the direct programs are not fullycomparable. In the case of many direct programs, the business’s number of employees is used <strong>to</strong> define the size of thebusiness. For the purposes of the SR&ED program, a “small CCPC” is one with prior-year taxable income of $500 000 orless and prior-year taxable capital of $10 million or less. These companies receive a refundable tax credit on their first$3 million of eligible expenses.3-9