Innovation Canada: A Call to Action

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Innovation Canada: A Call to ActionFigure 3.1 Total Envelope Expenditure a($ million, excluding federal program administration costs) (cont.)2007–08 2008–09 2009–10 2010–11 % 2010–11DirectExpenditureCollaborative Health Research Projects (NSERC) 9.2 9.1 11.7 13.7 0.9%Canadian Agri-Science Clusters (AAFC) NA NA 1.3 12.6 0.8%Engage Grants (NSERC) NA NA 1.4 11.6 0.8%Industrial R&D Internship Program(Tri-Council) NA 3.2 6.3 7.3 0.5%Idea to Innovation (NSERC) 5.5 7.4 6.3 5.7 0.4%Proof of Principle Program (CIHR) 6.6 4.4 1.8 5.4 0.4%Industrial Postgraduate Scholarships (NSERC) 6.0 5.6 5.1 5.3 0.4%Developing Innovative Agri-Products (AAFC) NA NA 1.4 5.2 0.4%Automotive Partnership Canada(Tri-Council, CFI and NRC) NA NA 0.2 5.1 0.3%Industrial R&D Fellowships (NSERC) 3.7 3.7 4.6 4.7 0.3%Industry Partnered Collaborative ResearchProgram (CIHR) 8.0 8.6 6.2 4.5 0.3%Business-led Networks of Centres ofExcellence Program (Tri-Council) NA 0.0 4.0 4.3 0.3%Industrial Undergraduate StudentsResearch Awards (NSERC) 3.4 3.4 3.3 3.9 0.3%Applied Research and CommercializationInitiative (FedDev ON) NA NA NA 0.9 0.1%Partnership Workshops Program (NSERC) 0.1 0.4 0.2 0.3 0.0%Interaction Grants Program (NSERC) NA NA 0.1 0.2 0.0%Technology Development Program (FedDev ON) NA NA NA 0.0 0.0%Subtotal 497.5 598.1 832.6 901.0 60.4%Direct expenditure: procurement programsTechnology Demonstration Program (DRDC) 31.2 30.1 23.4 23.5 1.6%Space Technology Development Program (CSA) 14.6 9.7 15.3 7.7 0.5%Subtotal 45.8 39.8 38.7 31.2 2.1%Direct expenditure: federally performed R&D – National Research Council institutes dIndustrial Materials Institute (NRC) 25.1 34.0 37.1 33.8 2.3%Institute for Aerospace Research (NRC) 36.7 28.7 33.1 30.1 2.0%Biotechnology Research Institute (NRC) 28.0 27.6 32.1 27.0 1.8%Institute for Research in Construction (NRC) 26.3 29.3 29.6 26.8 1.8%Institute for Microstructural Sciences (NRC) 24.1 25.1 25.9 24.3 1.6%Institute for Information Technology (NRC) 22.1 21.0 21.8 20.1 1.3%3-6
Overview of Programs to Support Business R&DFigure 3.1 Total Envelope Expenditure a($ million, excluding federal program administration costs) (cont.)2007–08 2008–09 2009–10 2010–11 % 2010–11DirectExpenditureInstitute for Marine Biosciences (NRC) 16.3 18.4 18.6 16.6 1.1%Plant Biotechnology Institute (NRC) 14.7 14.7 15.1 13.7 0.9%Institute for Biological Sciences (NRC) 15.3 14.9 16.1 13.4 0.9%Institute for Biodiagnostics (NRC) 13.3 13.1 15.5 13.3 0.9%National Institute for Nanotechnology (NRC) 12.5 12.2 12.7 12.3 0.8%Institute for Fuel Cell Innovation (NRC) 10.7 13.0 13.8 11.8 0.8%Steacie Institute for Molecular Sciences (NRC) 13.1 12.1 12.8 11.0 0.7%Institute for Chemical Process andEnvironmental Technology (NRC) 10.6 12.1 12.3 10.3 0.7%Institute for Ocean Technology (NRC) 10.9 10.4 11.0 10.1 0.7%Centre for Surface TransportationTechnology (NRC) 1.3 1.6 1.9 1.1 0.1%Canadian Hydraulics Centre (NRC) 1.0 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.0%Subtotal 281.9 288.9 310.1 276.3 18.5%Direct expenditure: federally performed R&D – otherAgricultural Bioproducts InnovationProgram (AAFC) 1.7 16.6 17.2 15.4 1.0%Canadian Agri-Science Clusters (AAFC) 0.0 0.0 0.9 6.7 0.4%Developing Innovative Agri-Products (AAFC) 0.0 0.0 0.5 5.8 0.4%FPInnovations – Canadian Wood FibreCentre (NRCan) 6.4 6.4 8.2 7.9 0.5%Subtotal 8.1 23.0 26.8 35.8 2.4%a BDC venture capital investments are not included above. SR&ED tax expenditures are projections for 2009 and 2010.SR&ED values are for taxation years and not fiscal years. Some of the programs listed as “repayable contribution programs”also provide non-repayable assistance, notably to not-for-profit entities. NRC expenditure for the Technology ClustersProgram and expenditure in support of Automotive Partnership Canada are included in the NRC institute totals. Theprograms listed under “federally performed R&D – other” all have a grant and contribution component in addition tofederally performed R&D — these activity totals are reported separately in the table. Subtotals may be subject to rounding.See List of Acronyms (page x) for the full name of sponsoring bodies (in parentheses).bcdThe 2007 figure for the SR&ED tax credit reported in Tax Expenditures and Evaluations 2010 is slightly higher at$3.35 billion (Department of Finance 2010b). That figure is based on updated data obtained after the Panel began itsanalysis.NA indicates a program did not exist in that particular fiscal year.Figures for the NRC institutes refer to the expenditure of appropriated funds.Source: Based on figures provided by departments and agencies.3-7
Page 1 and 2:
Innovation Canada:A Call to ActionR
Page 3 and 4:
Innovation Canada:A Call to Action
Page 5:
Dear Minister,Please find attached
Page 8 and 9:
Innovation Canada: A Call to Action
Page 10 and 11: Innovation Canada: A Call to Action
Page 35 and 36: The Context of the ReviewChapterThe
Page 37 and 38: The Context of the Reviewspreads wi
Page 39 and 40: The Context of the ReviewBox 2.2 De
Page 41 and 42: The Context of the ReviewIn absolut
Page 43 and 44: The Context of the ReviewInnovation
Page 45 and 46: The Context of the Reviewdevelopmen
Page 47 and 48: The Context of the ReviewBox 2.4 Wh
Page 49 and 50: The Context of the ReviewProsperity
Page 51 and 52: The Context of the ReviewFigure 2.6
Page 53: The Context of the Review%115110105
Page 69 and 70: Vision and PrinciplesChapterVision
Page 71 and 72: Vision and Principlesout in Chapter
Page 73 and 74: Program EffectivenessChapterProgram
Page 75 and 76: Program Effectivenessand processes.
Page 77 and 78: Program Effectivenessfull spectrum
Page 79 and 80: Program EffectivenessFigure 5.2 Rea
Page 81 and 82: Program EffectivenessFigure 5.4 Sat
Page 83 and 84: Program EffectivenessBox 5.1 Operat
Page 85 and 86: Program Effectivenessassessment of
Page 87 and 88: Program EffectivenessFigure 5.5 Dir
Page 89 and 90: Program EffectivenessFigure 5.6 Per
Page 91 and 92: Program Mix and DesignChapterProgra
Page 93 and 94: Program Mix and DesignBox 6.1 Direc
Page 95 and 96: Program Mix and Designthe needs of
Page 97 and 98: Program Mix and DesignFigure 6.3 Ta
Page 99 and 100: Program Mix and DesignBox 6.3 Stack
Page 101 and 102: Program Mix and Designcapital costs
Page 103 and 104: Program Mix and Designportion of th
Page 105 and 106: Filling the GapsChapterFilling the
Page 107 and 108: Filling the GapsBox 7.1 Use of Proc
Page 109 and 110: Filling the GapsBox 7.2 Canadian In
Page 111 and 112:
Filling the Gapscompetitive levels,
Page 113 and 114:
Filling the GapsBox 7.4 Institutes
Page 115 and 116:
Filling the GapsThe budgetary impli
Page 117 and 118:
Filling the GapsSuch concerns are i
Page 119 and 120:
Filling the GapsAngel InvestmentAt
Page 121 and 122:
Filling the GapsWith the foregoing
Page 123 and 124:
Filling the GapsBearing this in min
Page 125 and 126:
Leadership for InnovationChapterLea
Page 127 and 128:
Leadership for InnovationThe approp
Page 129 and 130:
Leadership for Innovationinnovation
Page 131 and 132:
ConclusionChapterConclusion9We are
Page 133 and 134:
Programs in the ReviewAnnexPrograms
Page 135:
Programs in the ReviewDepartment or
Page 138 and 139:
Page 140 and 141:
Page 142 and 143:
Page 144 and 145:
Page 146 and 147:
Page 148:
show all

Innovation Canada: A Call to Action

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?