Innovation Canada: A Call to Action
Innovation Canada: A Call to Action Innovation Canada: A Call to Action
Innovation Canada: A Call to Actionprojected contribution of the SR&ED tax credit, 4with the balance of 30 percent ($1.5 billion)coming from 59 direct expenditure programs.The distribution of expenditure across the manydirect spending programs is highly skewed: thelargest five represent about 40 percent of directexpenditure, while the largest 15 account forabout 72 percent (Figure 3.2). Only oneprogram — IRAP — accounted for more than15 percent of direct expenditure in 2010–11,while more than 50 percent of the programseach spent less than 1 percent of the$1.5 billion direct expenditure total.There is considerable diversity among the directprograms, as the examples below show.IRAP is a broad-based program that providesadvisory services and contribution funding tosupport high-risk R&D projects by small andmedium-sized enterprises (SMEs). It alsoprovides support to non-profit and postsecondaryinstitutions for the provision oftechnical and commercialization advice toSMEs.Sector-focussed initiatives include theNational Research Council’s (NRC) Institute forAerospace Research, which performscollaborative R&D with business, in additionto licensing and fee-for-service arrangements.Examples of arm’s-length delivery of businessinnovation support include FPInnovations, apublic–private partnership with the forestproducts sector, and SustainableDevelopment Technology Canada, a federallyfunded non-profit corporation that providesfunding for environmental technologyinitiatives.The Strategic Aerospace and DefenceInitiative (SADI) is the second largest directspending program and, as announced inBudget 2011, will be part of a specific reviewof all federal policies and programs related tothe aerospace industry. The Panelconsequently did not reach specific findingsregarding SADI, although it welcomes theopportunity to provide advice and any otherassistance in support of the review.Seventeen NRC institutes, including theIndustrial Materials Institute and the abovementionedInstitute for Aerospace Research,undertake a great variety of basic and appliedresearch for business and public sectorclients. Expenditure of appropriated funds bythese institutes was $276 million in 2010–11,about 19 percent of federal direct spendingin support of R&D.The Atlantic Innovation Fund, the WesternDiversification Program and the Business andRegional Growth Program (Quebec) areregional development programs. (Smallerprograms, not shown among the 15 largestin Figure 3.2, are provided by the Ontarioregional agencies FedNor and FedDev ON.)The regional agencies, which collectivelyaccounted for about 14 percent of directexpenditure in support of business innovationin 2010–11, generally provide repayablesupport to businesses and non-repayablesupport to not-for-profit entities.Several programs link the post-secondaryeducation sector to business innovation.For example, the Networks of Centres ofExcellence and Strategic Network Grants fundlarge-scale, multisectoral collaborativeresearch, and the Collaborative R&D Grantsaim to support joint research projects amongbusinesses, universities and researchers.4 Note that the 2010 amount for the SR&ED tax credit is a projection for the 2010 taxation year (see Department of Finance2010b).3-4
Overview of Programs to Support Business R&DFigure 3.1 Total Envelope Expenditure a($ million, excluding federal program administration costs)2007–08 2008–09 2009–10 2010–11 % 2010–11DirectExpenditureTotal envelope expenditure 4184.1 4567.6 4668.0 4962.9 —Total indirect expenditure: SR&EDtax credit (FIN and CRA) 3256.0 b 3485.0 3280.0 3470.0 —Total direct expenditure 928.1 1082.6 1388.0 1492.9 100.0%Direct expenditure: repayable contribution programs (amounts given to businesses in parentheses)Strategic Aerospace and Defence 9.7 33.7 61.5 112.7 7.6%Initiative (IC) (9.7) (33.7) (61.5) (112.7)Atlantic Innovation Fund (ACOA) 59.0 58.1 57.6 66.2 4.4%(24.7) (25.0) (28.6) (28.0)Business and Regional Growth 3.1 13.1 38.0 51.2 3.4%Program (CED-Q) (2.1) (5.5) (15.7) (22.7)Business Development Program (ACOA) 17.7 15.6 16.7 13.4 0.9%(9.9) (11.3) (12.1) (11.4)Northern Ontario Development 5.42 12.41 6.12 5.08 0.3%Program (IC – FedNor) (0.48) (1.32) (0.65) (0.41)Investing in Business Innovation Program NA c NA NA 0.1 0.0%(FedDev ON) (NA) (NA) (NA) (0.1)Automotive Innovation Fund (IC) NA 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0%(NA) (0.0) (0.0) (0.0)Subtotal 94.9 132.9 179.9 248.7 16.7%Direct expenditure: non-repayable grant and contribution programsIndustrial Research Assistance Program (NRC) 86.1 86.5 231.0 237.3 15.9%Networks of Centres of ExcellenceProgram (Tri-Council) 72.4 75.7 68.3 78.4 5.3%FPInnovations (NRCan) 28.6 28.4 48.8 78.3 5.2%SD Tech Fund (SDTC) 53.8 101.7 109.8 76.8 5.1%Western Diversification Program (WD) 63.7 69.8 82.7 73.3 4.9%Strategic Project Grants (NSERC) 67.0 73.6 61.1 57.0 3.8%Collaborative Research and DevelopmentGrants (NSERC) 44.4 50.3 52.5 55.5 3.7%Centres of Excellence for Commercializationand Research Program (Tri-Council) 0.0 10.9 30.9 49.8 3.3%Strategic Network Grants (NSERC) 16.5 22.6 31.8 33.5 2.2%Industrial Research Chairs (NSERC) 22.0 23.4 27.0 26.6 1.8%College and Community Innovation (NSERC) NA 2.1 14.6 28.0 1.9%Agricultural Bioproducts InnovationProgram (AAFC) 0.6 7.3 20.5 15.7 1.1%3-5
- Page 8 and 9: Innovation Canada: A Call to Action
- Page 10 and 11: Innovation Canada: A Call to Action
- Page 12 and 13: Innovation Canada: A Call to Action
- Page 14 and 15: Innovation Canada: A Call to Action
- Page 16 and 17: Innovation Canada: A Call to Action
- Page 18 and 19: Innovation Canada: A Call to Action
- Page 20 and 21: Innovation Canada: A Call to Action
- Page 22 and 23: Innovation Canada: A Call to Action
- Page 24 and 25: Innovation Canada: A Call to Action
- Page 26 and 27: Innovation Canada: A Call to Action
- Page 28 and 29: Innovation Canada: A Call to Action
- Page 30 and 31: Innovation Canada: A Call to Action
- Page 32 and 33: Innovation Canada: A Call to Action
- Page 35 and 36: The Context of the ReviewChapterThe
- Page 37 and 38: The Context of the Reviewspreads wi
- Page 39 and 40: The Context of the ReviewBox 2.2 De
- Page 41 and 42: The Context of the ReviewIn absolut
- Page 43 and 44: The Context of the ReviewInnovation
- Page 45 and 46: The Context of the Reviewdevelopmen
- Page 47 and 48: The Context of the ReviewBox 2.4 Wh
- Page 49 and 50: The Context of the ReviewProsperity
- Page 51 and 52: The Context of the ReviewFigure 2.6
- Page 53: The Context of the Review%115110105
- Page 56 and 57: Innovation Canada: A Call to Action
- Page 60 and 61: Innovation Canada: A Call to Action
- Page 62 and 63: Innovation Canada: A Call to Action
- Page 64 and 65: Innovation Canada: A Call to Action
- Page 66 and 67: Innovation Canada: A Call to Action
- Page 69 and 70: Vision and PrinciplesChapterVision
- Page 71 and 72: Vision and Principlesout in Chapter
- Page 73 and 74: Program EffectivenessChapterProgram
- Page 75 and 76: Program Effectivenessand processes.
- Page 77 and 78: Program Effectivenessfull spectrum
- Page 79 and 80: Program EffectivenessFigure 5.2 Rea
- Page 81 and 82: Program EffectivenessFigure 5.4 Sat
- Page 83 and 84: Program EffectivenessBox 5.1 Operat
- Page 85 and 86: Program Effectivenessassessment of
- Page 87 and 88: Program EffectivenessFigure 5.5 Dir
- Page 89 and 90: Program EffectivenessFigure 5.6 Per
- Page 91 and 92: Program Mix and DesignChapterProgra
- Page 93 and 94: Program Mix and DesignBox 6.1 Direc
- Page 95 and 96: Program Mix and Designthe needs of
- Page 97 and 98: Program Mix and DesignFigure 6.3 Ta
- Page 99 and 100: Program Mix and DesignBox 6.3 Stack
- Page 101 and 102: Program Mix and Designcapital costs
- Page 103 and 104: Program Mix and Designportion of th
- Page 105 and 106: Filling the GapsChapterFilling the
- Page 107 and 108: Filling the GapsBox 7.1 Use of Proc
<strong>Innovation</strong> <strong>Canada</strong>: A <strong>Call</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>Action</strong>projected contribution of the SR&ED tax credit, 4with the balance of 30 percent ($1.5 billion)coming from 59 direct expenditure programs.The distribution of expenditure across the manydirect spending programs is highly skewed: thelargest five represent about 40 percent of directexpenditure, while the largest 15 account forabout 72 percent (Figure 3.2). Only oneprogram — IRAP — accounted for more than15 percent of direct expenditure in 2010–11,while more than 50 percent of the programseach spent less than 1 percent of the$1.5 billion direct expenditure <strong>to</strong>tal.There is considerable diversity among the directprograms, as the examples below show.IRAP is a broad-based program that providesadvisory services and contribution funding <strong>to</strong>support high-risk R&D projects by small andmedium-sized enterprises (SMEs). It alsoprovides support <strong>to</strong> non-profit and postsecondaryinstitutions for the provision oftechnical and commercialization advice <strong>to</strong>SMEs.Sec<strong>to</strong>r-focussed initiatives include theNational Research Council’s (NRC) Institute forAerospace Research, which performscollaborative R&D with business, in addition<strong>to</strong> licensing and fee-for-service arrangements.Examples of arm’s-length delivery of businessinnovation support include FP<strong>Innovation</strong>s, apublic–private partnership with the forestproducts sec<strong>to</strong>r, and SustainableDevelopment Technology <strong>Canada</strong>, a federallyfunded non-profit corporation that providesfunding for environmental technologyinitiatives.The Strategic Aerospace and DefenceInitiative (SADI) is the second largest directspending program and, as announced inBudget 2011, will be part of a specific reviewof all federal policies and programs related <strong>to</strong>the aerospace industry. The Panelconsequently did not reach specific findingsregarding SADI, although it welcomes theopportunity <strong>to</strong> provide advice and any otherassistance in support of the review.Seventeen NRC institutes, including theIndustrial Materials Institute and the abovementionedInstitute for Aerospace Research,undertake a great variety of basic and appliedresearch for business and public sec<strong>to</strong>rclients. Expenditure of appropriated funds bythese institutes was $276 million in 2010–11,about 19 percent of federal direct spendingin support of R&D.The Atlantic <strong>Innovation</strong> Fund, the WesternDiversification Program and the Business andRegional Growth Program (Quebec) areregional development programs. (Smallerprograms, not shown among the 15 largestin Figure 3.2, are provided by the Ontarioregional agencies FedNor and FedDev ON.)The regional agencies, which collectivelyaccounted for about 14 percent of directexpenditure in support of business innovationin 2010–11, generally provide repayablesupport <strong>to</strong> businesses and non-repayablesupport <strong>to</strong> not-for-profit entities.Several programs link the post-secondaryeducation sec<strong>to</strong>r <strong>to</strong> business innovation.For example, the Networks of Centres ofExcellence and Strategic Network Grants fundlarge-scale, multisec<strong>to</strong>ral collaborativeresearch, and the Collaborative R&D Grantsaim <strong>to</strong> support joint research projects amongbusinesses, universities and researchers.4 Note that the 2010 amount for the SR&ED tax credit is a projection for the 2010 taxation year (see Department of Finance2010b).3-4