<strong>Innovation</strong> <strong>Canada</strong>: A <strong>Call</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>Action</strong>overcome the disadvantage of small scale or <strong>to</strong>lower the barriers <strong>to</strong> getting started. Forexample, student internships in business canprovide the crucial first experience. In addition,many smaller R&D-focussed companies cannotafford <strong>to</strong> maintain in-house all the specializedexpertise and infrastructure they need, andmust rely on public sec<strong>to</strong>r labs and advisoryservices such as the Industrial ResearchAssistance Program (IRAP). Government as alead cus<strong>to</strong>mer may also help a young innovativebusiness achieve the production scale andcredibility <strong>to</strong> compete in the wider market.Moreover, public sec<strong>to</strong>r contributions <strong>to</strong> seedand venture capital may be needed <strong>to</strong> risk-sharein the early stages of a company’s developmentand thereby enable many technology-basedcompanies in <strong>Canada</strong> <strong>to</strong> grow <strong>to</strong> a viable size.Public intervention has costs as well as benefits.The taxes raised <strong>to</strong> fund government programsdiminish economic performance throughadverse effects on incentives <strong>to</strong> work, save andinvest. All programs generate costs ofadministration and compliance, which must benetted against the benefits. Just as there aremarket failures, there may also be “governmentfailures.” These may be due <strong>to</strong> inadequateinformation or <strong>to</strong> political pressure — forexample, favouring certain vested interests,creating <strong>to</strong>o many small-scale programs orcontinuing <strong>to</strong> support activities that should beterminated.All of these considerations need <strong>to</strong> be borne inmind when deciding whether governmentintervention <strong>to</strong> correct a perceived marketfailure is warranted. These issues are addressedconcretely in subsequent chapters. Theremainder of this chapter describes the universeof programs addressed by the Panel.Profile of FederalGovernment Support forBusiness R&DThe federal government supports business andcommercially oriented R&D through a broadarray of programs, 1 each of which varies acrossa number of salient features:input supported — ideas and knowledge;talented, educated and entrepreneurialpeople; networks, collaborations andlinkages; and capital and financingtype of activity supported — basicresearch, applied research, experimentaldevelopment and commercializationform of support — tax incentives, repayableor non-repayable grants and contributions,provision of services, and procurement ofresearch and of innovative goods and serviceseligible recipient — support provideddirectly <strong>to</strong> a business versus support <strong>to</strong> otherorganizations conducting commerciallyoriented R&D activitiessize — program budget, number of projectssupported, amount of administrative staffand maximum assistance providedscope — national, sec<strong>to</strong>ral and regional.To capture this variety, the Panel established agovernment-wide program database covering60 programs, delivered by 17 federal entities(Figure 3.1). 2 The Panel’s findings are limited <strong>to</strong>the 60 programs, which encompass most butnot all federally supported business andcommercially oriented R&D (Box 3.1). Thisexercise is the first of its kind, and is an essentialstep <strong>to</strong>ward conceptualizing the diversity offederal business R&D programs as an overallportfolio of support.1 “Programs” are broadly defined in this review and include tax credit support, direct spending programs, venture capitalinvestments and federally performed R&D.2 Program expenditure information in the database and cited throughout this report is based on figures provided in July 2011by the departments and agencies that administer the programs within this review. Program expenditure information wasavailable for 58 of the 60 programs.3-2
Overview of Programs <strong>to</strong> Support Business R&DBox 3.1 Expenditure Reviewed by the PanelThe Panel was mandated <strong>to</strong> review federal expenditure encouraging business R&D. Based onfigures provided by departments and agencies, it is estimated that expenditure in support ofbusiness innovation was approximately $6.44 billion in fiscal year 2010–11, which comprisesmore than 100 programs and institutes.Expenditure in Support of Business R&D, 2010–11($ billion, including federal program administration costs)SR&ED tax expenditure(2010 projected amount)$1.30Direct support <strong>to</strong> business R&D$3.53Direct support <strong>to</strong> public/non-profitcommercially-relevant R&D$0.98Direct support not reviewed by the Panel(based on preliminary estimates)$0.63Source: Based on figures provided by departments and agencies.Of this amount, the Panel reviewed 60 programs and institutes <strong>to</strong>talling $5.14 billion (or$4.96 billion when federal program administration costs are removed). These programs weredrawn largely from an illustrative list that accompanied the Panel’s mandate letter. The Panel hadthe flexibility <strong>to</strong> choose the programs for review. It refined the initial list by removing a limitednumber of programs whose primary purpose was not <strong>to</strong> support business innovation. Inaddition, it added others <strong>to</strong> ensure representative coverage of the diversity of instruments in theportfolio. The resulting list (Annex A) captures key programs and the majority (about 80 percent)of federal R&D expenditure supporting business innovation.In the 2010–11 fiscal year, the 60 programs inthe review — hereafter referred <strong>to</strong> collectively asthe “envelope” — had estimated expenditureof approximately $4.96 billion (excluding federalprogram administration costs). 3 Of thisamount, about 70 percent ($3.47 billion) is the3 Business Development Bank of <strong>Canada</strong> (BDC) venture capital is excluded from this <strong>to</strong>tal, since BDC disbursements areinvestments rather than expenditures. In addition, while the government capitalizes BDC, it does not provide specificfunding on a regular basis for this specific activity. As of the third quarter of 2010, the BDC venture capital portfoliocommitment for direct investments was about $550 million and was about $267 million for fund investments. Note as wellthat the federal tax credit provided <strong>to</strong> individuals for the acquisition of shares in labour-sponsored venture capitalcorporations costs the federal government $125 million a year.3-3