Innovation Canada: A Call to Action
Innovation Canada: A Call to Action Innovation Canada: A Call to Action
Innovation Canada: A Call to Actionovercome the disadvantage of small scale or tolower the barriers to getting started. Forexample, student internships in business canprovide the crucial first experience. In addition,many smaller R&D-focussed companies cannotafford to maintain in-house all the specializedexpertise and infrastructure they need, andmust rely on public sector labs and advisoryservices such as the Industrial ResearchAssistance Program (IRAP). Government as alead customer may also help a young innovativebusiness achieve the production scale andcredibility to compete in the wider market.Moreover, public sector contributions to seedand venture capital may be needed to risk-sharein the early stages of a company’s developmentand thereby enable many technology-basedcompanies in Canada to grow to a viable size.Public intervention has costs as well as benefits.The taxes raised to fund government programsdiminish economic performance throughadverse effects on incentives to work, save andinvest. All programs generate costs ofadministration and compliance, which must benetted against the benefits. Just as there aremarket failures, there may also be “governmentfailures.” These may be due to inadequateinformation or to political pressure — forexample, favouring certain vested interests,creating too many small-scale programs orcontinuing to support activities that should beterminated.All of these considerations need to be borne inmind when deciding whether governmentintervention to correct a perceived marketfailure is warranted. These issues are addressedconcretely in subsequent chapters. Theremainder of this chapter describes the universeof programs addressed by the Panel.Profile of FederalGovernment Support forBusiness R&DThe federal government supports business andcommercially oriented R&D through a broadarray of programs, 1 each of which varies acrossa number of salient features:input supported — ideas and knowledge;talented, educated and entrepreneurialpeople; networks, collaborations andlinkages; and capital and financingtype of activity supported — basicresearch, applied research, experimentaldevelopment and commercializationform of support — tax incentives, repayableor non-repayable grants and contributions,provision of services, and procurement ofresearch and of innovative goods and serviceseligible recipient — support provideddirectly to a business versus support to otherorganizations conducting commerciallyoriented R&D activitiessize — program budget, number of projectssupported, amount of administrative staffand maximum assistance providedscope — national, sectoral and regional.To capture this variety, the Panel established agovernment-wide program database covering60 programs, delivered by 17 federal entities(Figure 3.1). 2 The Panel’s findings are limited tothe 60 programs, which encompass most butnot all federally supported business andcommercially oriented R&D (Box 3.1). Thisexercise is the first of its kind, and is an essentialstep toward conceptualizing the diversity offederal business R&D programs as an overallportfolio of support.1 “Programs” are broadly defined in this review and include tax credit support, direct spending programs, venture capitalinvestments and federally performed R&D.2 Program expenditure information in the database and cited throughout this report is based on figures provided in July 2011by the departments and agencies that administer the programs within this review. Program expenditure information wasavailable for 58 of the 60 programs.3-2
Overview of Programs to Support Business R&DBox 3.1 Expenditure Reviewed by the PanelThe Panel was mandated to review federal expenditure encouraging business R&D. Based onfigures provided by departments and agencies, it is estimated that expenditure in support ofbusiness innovation was approximately $6.44 billion in fiscal year 2010–11, which comprisesmore than 100 programs and institutes.Expenditure in Support of Business R&D, 2010–11($ billion, including federal program administration costs)SR&ED tax expenditure(2010 projected amount)$1.30Direct support to business R&D$3.53Direct support to public/non-profitcommercially-relevant R&D$0.98Direct support not reviewed by the Panel(based on preliminary estimates)$0.63Source: Based on figures provided by departments and agencies.Of this amount, the Panel reviewed 60 programs and institutes totalling $5.14 billion (or$4.96 billion when federal program administration costs are removed). These programs weredrawn largely from an illustrative list that accompanied the Panel’s mandate letter. The Panel hadthe flexibility to choose the programs for review. It refined the initial list by removing a limitednumber of programs whose primary purpose was not to support business innovation. Inaddition, it added others to ensure representative coverage of the diversity of instruments in theportfolio. The resulting list (Annex A) captures key programs and the majority (about 80 percent)of federal R&D expenditure supporting business innovation.In the 2010–11 fiscal year, the 60 programs inthe review — hereafter referred to collectively asthe “envelope” — had estimated expenditureof approximately $4.96 billion (excluding federalprogram administration costs). 3 Of thisamount, about 70 percent ($3.47 billion) is the3 Business Development Bank of Canada (BDC) venture capital is excluded from this total, since BDC disbursements areinvestments rather than expenditures. In addition, while the government capitalizes BDC, it does not provide specificfunding on a regular basis for this specific activity. As of the third quarter of 2010, the BDC venture capital portfoliocommitment for direct investments was about $550 million and was about $267 million for fund investments. Note as wellthat the federal tax credit provided to individuals for the acquisition of shares in labour-sponsored venture capitalcorporations costs the federal government $125 million a year.3-3
- Page 5: Dear Minister,Please find attached
- Page 8 and 9: Innovation Canada: A Call to Action
- Page 10 and 11: Innovation Canada: A Call to Action
- Page 12 and 13: Innovation Canada: A Call to Action
- Page 14 and 15: Innovation Canada: A Call to Action
- Page 16 and 17: Innovation Canada: A Call to Action
- Page 18 and 19: Innovation Canada: A Call to Action
- Page 20 and 21: Innovation Canada: A Call to Action
- Page 22 and 23: Innovation Canada: A Call to Action
- Page 24 and 25: Innovation Canada: A Call to Action
- Page 26 and 27: Innovation Canada: A Call to Action
- Page 28 and 29: Innovation Canada: A Call to Action
- Page 30 and 31: Innovation Canada: A Call to Action
- Page 32 and 33: Innovation Canada: A Call to Action
- Page 35 and 36: The Context of the ReviewChapterThe
- Page 37 and 38: The Context of the Reviewspreads wi
- Page 39 and 40: The Context of the ReviewBox 2.2 De
- Page 41 and 42: The Context of the ReviewIn absolut
- Page 43 and 44: The Context of the ReviewInnovation
- Page 45 and 46: The Context of the Reviewdevelopmen
- Page 47 and 48: The Context of the ReviewBox 2.4 Wh
- Page 49 and 50: The Context of the ReviewProsperity
- Page 51 and 52: The Context of the ReviewFigure 2.6
- Page 53: The Context of the Review%115110105
- Page 58 and 59: Innovation Canada: A Call to Action
- Page 60 and 61: Innovation Canada: A Call to Action
- Page 62 and 63: Innovation Canada: A Call to Action
- Page 64 and 65: Innovation Canada: A Call to Action
- Page 66 and 67: Innovation Canada: A Call to Action
- Page 69 and 70: Vision and PrinciplesChapterVision
- Page 71 and 72: Vision and Principlesout in Chapter
- Page 73 and 74: Program EffectivenessChapterProgram
- Page 75 and 76: Program Effectivenessand processes.
- Page 77 and 78: Program Effectivenessfull spectrum
- Page 79 and 80: Program EffectivenessFigure 5.2 Rea
- Page 81 and 82: Program EffectivenessFigure 5.4 Sat
- Page 83 and 84: Program EffectivenessBox 5.1 Operat
- Page 85 and 86: Program Effectivenessassessment of
- Page 87 and 88: Program EffectivenessFigure 5.5 Dir
- Page 89 and 90: Program EffectivenessFigure 5.6 Per
- Page 91 and 92: Program Mix and DesignChapterProgra
- Page 93 and 94: Program Mix and DesignBox 6.1 Direc
- Page 95 and 96: Program Mix and Designthe needs of
- Page 97 and 98: Program Mix and DesignFigure 6.3 Ta
- Page 99 and 100: Program Mix and DesignBox 6.3 Stack
- Page 101 and 102: Program Mix and Designcapital costs
- Page 103 and 104: Program Mix and Designportion of th
- Page 105 and 106: Filling the GapsChapterFilling the
<strong>Innovation</strong> <strong>Canada</strong>: A <strong>Call</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>Action</strong>overcome the disadvantage of small scale or <strong>to</strong>lower the barriers <strong>to</strong> getting started. Forexample, student internships in business canprovide the crucial first experience. In addition,many smaller R&D-focussed companies cannotafford <strong>to</strong> maintain in-house all the specializedexpertise and infrastructure they need, andmust rely on public sec<strong>to</strong>r labs and advisoryservices such as the Industrial ResearchAssistance Program (IRAP). Government as alead cus<strong>to</strong>mer may also help a young innovativebusiness achieve the production scale andcredibility <strong>to</strong> compete in the wider market.Moreover, public sec<strong>to</strong>r contributions <strong>to</strong> seedand venture capital may be needed <strong>to</strong> risk-sharein the early stages of a company’s developmentand thereby enable many technology-basedcompanies in <strong>Canada</strong> <strong>to</strong> grow <strong>to</strong> a viable size.Public intervention has costs as well as benefits.The taxes raised <strong>to</strong> fund government programsdiminish economic performance throughadverse effects on incentives <strong>to</strong> work, save andinvest. All programs generate costs ofadministration and compliance, which must benetted against the benefits. Just as there aremarket failures, there may also be “governmentfailures.” These may be due <strong>to</strong> inadequateinformation or <strong>to</strong> political pressure — forexample, favouring certain vested interests,creating <strong>to</strong>o many small-scale programs orcontinuing <strong>to</strong> support activities that should beterminated.All of these considerations need <strong>to</strong> be borne inmind when deciding whether governmentintervention <strong>to</strong> correct a perceived marketfailure is warranted. These issues are addressedconcretely in subsequent chapters. Theremainder of this chapter describes the universeof programs addressed by the Panel.Profile of FederalGovernment Support forBusiness R&DThe federal government supports business andcommercially oriented R&D through a broadarray of programs, 1 each of which varies acrossa number of salient features:input supported — ideas and knowledge;talented, educated and entrepreneurialpeople; networks, collaborations andlinkages; and capital and financingtype of activity supported — basicresearch, applied research, experimentaldevelopment and commercializationform of support — tax incentives, repayableor non-repayable grants and contributions,provision of services, and procurement ofresearch and of innovative goods and serviceseligible recipient — support provideddirectly <strong>to</strong> a business versus support <strong>to</strong> otherorganizations conducting commerciallyoriented R&D activitiessize — program budget, number of projectssupported, amount of administrative staffand maximum assistance providedscope — national, sec<strong>to</strong>ral and regional.To capture this variety, the Panel established agovernment-wide program database covering60 programs, delivered by 17 federal entities(Figure 3.1). 2 The Panel’s findings are limited <strong>to</strong>the 60 programs, which encompass most butnot all federally supported business andcommercially oriented R&D (Box 3.1). Thisexercise is the first of its kind, and is an essentialstep <strong>to</strong>ward conceptualizing the diversity offederal business R&D programs as an overallportfolio of support.1 “Programs” are broadly defined in this review and include tax credit support, direct spending programs, venture capitalinvestments and federally performed R&D.2 Program expenditure information in the database and cited throughout this report is based on figures provided in July 2011by the departments and agencies that administer the programs within this review. Program expenditure information wasavailable for 58 of the 60 programs.3-2