Innovation Canada: A Call to Action
Innovation Canada: A Call to Action Innovation Canada: A Call to Action
Innovation Canada: A Call to Actionprograms that support business-focussedR&D through federal granting councils andother departments and agencies, includingresearch performed in universities andcolleges that fosters support for businessR&D, such as the Centres of Excellence forCommercialization and Research program.We were given the latitude to consider otherfederal initiatives relevant to the review’s scope.However, the review was to exclude: (i) researchconducted in federal laboratories to fulfil theirregulatory mandates and (ii) basic researchconducted in institutions of higher educationand not intended to foster support for businessR&D.We were asked specifically to provide advicerelated to the following questions:What federal initiatives are most effective inincreasing business R&D and facilitatingcommercially relevant R&D partnerships?Is the current mix and design of tax incentivesand direct support for business R&D andbusiness-focussed R&D appropriate?What, if any, gaps are evident in the currentsuite of programming, and what might bedone to fill these gaps?Consistent with our mandate, we were asked toaddress any and all federal programs that havean impact on business or commercially orientedR&D, as well as how such programs fit withinthe larger innovation context. The mandatespecified furthermore that ourrecommendations should not result in anincrease or decrease in the overall level offunding required for federal R&D initiatives.Where we have recommended measures thatwould yield savings, we have also identifiedareas in need of the funds that would be freedup. Our primary objective has been to advise onhow the government’s existing outlays insupport of business and commercially orientedR&D can be deployed more effectively topromote innovation, productivity growth andincreased prosperity for Canadians. Therefore,while the immediate effect of ourrecommendations is meant to be budgetneutral, the ultimate impact will be a moreproductive economy and a stronger fiscalposition.The Panel’s ApproachIn fulfilment of our mandate, we have, with theaid of a secretariat seconded from the federalgovernment, overseen a thorough process ofresearch, program assessment and consultation.The research included expert briefings, anextensive literature review and other technicalbackground work by, or on behalf of, thesecretariat. The program assessment, which isdescribed more fully in Chapter 3, encompasseda set of 60 programs covering the gamut offederal initiatives to foster business R&D.Our consultation phase began with the issue ofa public consultation paper in December 2010.This elicited 228 submissions — 96 fromcompanies, 80 from organizations andassociations, 38 from academic institutions,seven from governments or governmentalorganizations, and seven from individuals. Tosupplement written submissions, face-to-faceconsultations were held in Vancouver, Calgary,Winnipeg, Waterloo, Toronto, Ottawa,Montréal, Québec and Halifax. We met a totalof 164 participants during the course of 32sessions, each of which focussed on a theme orsector of relevance to the host region. Meetingswere also held with senior officials from manyfederal departments and agencies and from allprovinces.We extended the scope of in-personconsultations beyond Canada to learn aboutinternational perspectives on issues germane to1-4
Motivation and Mandatethis review. Meetings took place in Australia,Germany, Singapore, the United Kingdom andthe United States, and with officials of theOECD and Tekes 1 in Paris.We complemented our face-to-faceconsultations with a survey conducted by EKOSResearch Associates Inc. of more than athousand R&D-performing businesses of varyingsizes, sectors and provinces. The survey resultsprovided us with a rich base of data, from theclient perspective, on the impact, strengths andweaknesses of federal support for businessR&D.This extensive process of consultations, researchand program assessment, supplemented by ourown deliberations and analyses, formed thebasis upon which we developed our advice forthe government.1 Tekes is a Finnish funding agency for technology and innovation.1-5
- Page 1 and 2: Innovation Canada:A Call to ActionR
- Page 3 and 4: Innovation Canada:A Call to Action
- Page 5: Dear Minister,Please find attached
- Page 8 and 9: Innovation Canada: A Call to Action
- Page 10 and 11: Innovation Canada: A Call to Action
- Page 12 and 13: Innovation Canada: A Call to Action
- Page 14 and 15: Innovation Canada: A Call to Action
- Page 16 and 17: Innovation Canada: A Call to Action
- Page 18 and 19: Innovation Canada: A Call to Action
- Page 20 and 21: Innovation Canada: A Call to Action
- Page 22 and 23: Innovation Canada: A Call to Action
- Page 24 and 25: Innovation Canada: A Call to Action
- Page 26 and 27: Innovation Canada: A Call to Action
- Page 28 and 29: Innovation Canada: A Call to Action
- Page 30 and 31: Innovation Canada: A Call to Action
- Page 35 and 36: The Context of the ReviewChapterThe
- Page 37 and 38: The Context of the Reviewspreads wi
- Page 39 and 40: The Context of the ReviewBox 2.2 De
- Page 41 and 42: The Context of the ReviewIn absolut
- Page 43 and 44: The Context of the ReviewInnovation
- Page 45 and 46: The Context of the Reviewdevelopmen
- Page 47 and 48: The Context of the ReviewBox 2.4 Wh
- Page 49 and 50: The Context of the ReviewProsperity
- Page 51 and 52: The Context of the ReviewFigure 2.6
- Page 53: The Context of the Review%115110105
- Page 56 and 57: Innovation Canada: A Call to Action
- Page 58 and 59: Innovation Canada: A Call to Action
- Page 60 and 61: Innovation Canada: A Call to Action
- Page 62 and 63: Innovation Canada: A Call to Action
- Page 64 and 65: Innovation Canada: A Call to Action
- Page 66 and 67: Innovation Canada: A Call to Action
- Page 69 and 70: Vision and PrinciplesChapterVision
- Page 71 and 72: Vision and Principlesout in Chapter
- Page 73 and 74: Program EffectivenessChapterProgram
- Page 75 and 76: Program Effectivenessand processes.
- Page 77 and 78: Program Effectivenessfull spectrum
- Page 79 and 80: Program EffectivenessFigure 5.2 Rea
- Page 81 and 82: Program EffectivenessFigure 5.4 Sat
Motivation and Mandatethis review. Meetings <strong>to</strong>ok place in Australia,Germany, Singapore, the United Kingdom andthe United States, and with officials of theOECD and Tekes 1 in Paris.We complemented our face-<strong>to</strong>-faceconsultations with a survey conducted by EKOSResearch Associates Inc. of more than athousand R&D-performing businesses of varyingsizes, sec<strong>to</strong>rs and provinces. The survey resultsprovided us with a rich base of data, from theclient perspective, on the impact, strengths andweaknesses of federal support for businessR&D.This extensive process of consultations, researchand program assessment, supplemented by ourown deliberations and analyses, formed thebasis upon which we developed our advice forthe government.1 Tekes is a Finnish funding agency for technology and innovation.1-5