Innovation Canada: A Call to Action

Innovation Canada: A Call to Action Innovation Canada: A Call to Action

sedi2.esteri.it
from sedi2.esteri.it More from this publisher
12.07.2015 Views

Innovation Canada: A Call to Actionand succeed. It is essential that this highlyvalued program be made simpler, morepredictable and more cost effective inpromoting business innovation.However, the heavy reliance on the programimplies that federal support for innovation maybe overweighted toward subsidizing the cost ofbusiness R&D rather than other importantaspects of innovation. For this reason, webelieve that the government should rebalancethe mix of direct and indirect funding bydecreasing spending through the SR&EDprogram and directing the savings tocomplementary initiatives outlined in ourother recommendations.For the reasons outlined above, as detailed inChapter 6 of our main report, we make thefollowing recommendations.Recommendation 2Simplify the SR&ED program by basing thetax credit for SMEs on labour-related costs.Redeploy funds from the tax credit to amore complete set of direct supportinitiatives to help SMEs grow into larger,competitive firms.2.1 Simpler compliance andadministration — The tax creditbenefiting small and medium-sizedCanadian-controlled private corporations(CCPCs) should be based on labour-relatedcosts in order to reduce compliance andadministration costs. Because the creditwould be calculated on a smaller cost basethan at present, its rate would be increased.Over time, the government should alsoconsider extending this new labour-basedapproach to all firms, provided it is able toconcurrently provide compensatoryassistance to offset the negative impactsof this approach on large firms with highnon-labour R&D costs.2.2 More predictable qualification —Improve the Canada Revenue Agency’spreclaim project review service to providefirms with pre-approval of their eligibility forthe credit.2.3 More cost effective — Reduce theamount of SR&ED tax credit assistance byintroducing incentives that encourage thegrowth and profitability of small andmedium-sized enterprises (SMEs) whiledecreasing the refundable portion of thecredit over time. Redeploy the savings tofund new and/or enhanced support forinnovation by SMEs, as proposed in thePanel’s other recommendations.2.4 More accountable — Provide data on theperformance of the SR&ED tax credit on aregular basis to permit evaluation of its costeffectivenessin stimulating R&D, innovationand productivity growth.2.5 Phased implementation andconsultation — Adopt the proposedchanges through a phased-in approach togive the business sector time to plan andadjust smoothly. There should be earlyconsultations with the provinces on theproposed changes, given that they maywant to consider adopting the same baseas the federal government.Program GapsThe third question in the Panel’s mandate asks:What, if any, gaps are evident in the currentsuite of programming, and what might be doneto fill these gaps?Based on our consultations, the identificationby the OECD of gaps in Canada’s innovationsystem, and the findings of panels before us —namely, the Competition PolicyE-10

Executive SummaryReview Panel and the Expert Panel onCommercialization — we concluded that threegaps were most significant: (i) the strategic useof public sector procurement to fosterinnovation, (ii) the enhanced use of large-scaleresearch collaboration and (iii) the availability ofrisk capital to finance the development andgrowth of innovative businesses. The followingthree recommendations, as detailed inChapter 7 of our main report, address eachof these gaps in turn.Public Sector ProcurementWe concluded from our consultations andresearch that government support for businessinnovation needs to employ more “demandpull”measures to complement the moretraditional suite of “research-push” measures.To this end, public sector procurement andrelated programming should be used to createopportunity and demand for leading-edgegoods, services and technologies from Canadiansuppliers. This will foster the development ofinnovative and globally competitive Canadiancompanies while also stimulating innovationand greater productivity in the delivery of publicsector goods and services.Recommendation 3Make business innovation one of thecore objectives of procurement, with thesupporting initiatives to achieve thisobjective.3.1 Innovation as an objective — Make theencouragement of innovation in theCanadian economy a stated objective ofprocurement policies and programs.3.2 Scope for innovative proposals —Wherever feasible and appropriate, baseprocurement requests for proposals on adescription of the needs to be met orproblems to be solved, rather than ondetailed technical specifications that leavetoo little opportunity for innovativeproposals.3.3 Demand-pull — Establish targets fordepartments and agencies for contractingout R&D expenditures, including a subtargetfor SMEs, and evolve the current pilotphase of the Canadian InnovationCommercialization Program (CICP) into apermanent, larger program that solicits andfunds the development of solutions tospecific departmental needs so that thegovernment stimulates demand for, andbecomes a first-time user of, innovativeproducts and technologies.3.4 Globally competitive capabilities —Plan and design major Crown procurementsto provide opportunities for Canadiancompanies to become globally competitivesubcontractors.3.5 Working collaboratively — Exploreavenues of collaboration with provincialand municipal governments regarding theuse of procurement to support innovationby Canadian suppliers and to fostergovernments’ adoption of innovativeproducts that will help reduce the cost andimprove the quality of public services.Public–Private Research CollaborationWe believe that public–private researchconsortia in Canada lack the scale needed tohave significant impact on the development ofglobally competitive Canadian companies.Consequently, Canada needs a fundamentallynew approach to building such collaborations inareas of strategic importance and opportunityfor the economy. The existing institutes of theNRC are a unique asset in terms ofinfrastructure, talent and sectoral and regionalcoverage. Consistent with the new directionbeing taken by NRC management, we believethat several of the institutes should be evolvedto become a core national constellation of R&DE-11

Executive SummaryReview Panel and the Expert Panel onCommercialization — we concluded that threegaps were most significant: (i) the strategic useof public sec<strong>to</strong>r procurement <strong>to</strong> fosterinnovation, (ii) the enhanced use of large-scaleresearch collaboration and (iii) the availability ofrisk capital <strong>to</strong> finance the development andgrowth of innovative businesses. The followingthree recommendations, as detailed inChapter 7 of our main report, address eachof these gaps in turn.Public Sec<strong>to</strong>r ProcurementWe concluded from our consultations andresearch that government support for businessinnovation needs <strong>to</strong> employ more “demandpull”measures <strong>to</strong> complement the moretraditional suite of “research-push” measures.To this end, public sec<strong>to</strong>r procurement andrelated programming should be used <strong>to</strong> createopportunity and demand for leading-edgegoods, services and technologies from Canadiansuppliers. This will foster the development ofinnovative and globally competitive Canadiancompanies while also stimulating innovationand greater productivity in the delivery of publicsec<strong>to</strong>r goods and services.Recommendation 3Make business innovation one of thecore objectives of procurement, with thesupporting initiatives <strong>to</strong> achieve thisobjective.3.1 <strong>Innovation</strong> as an objective — Make theencouragement of innovation in theCanadian economy a stated objective ofprocurement policies and programs.3.2 Scope for innovative proposals —Wherever feasible and appropriate, baseprocurement requests for proposals on adescription of the needs <strong>to</strong> be met orproblems <strong>to</strong> be solved, rather than ondetailed technical specifications that leave<strong>to</strong>o little opportunity for innovativeproposals.3.3 Demand-pull — Establish targets fordepartments and agencies for contractingout R&D expenditures, including a subtargetfor SMEs, and evolve the current pilotphase of the Canadian <strong>Innovation</strong>Commercialization Program (CICP) in<strong>to</strong> apermanent, larger program that solicits andfunds the development of solutions <strong>to</strong>specific departmental needs so that thegovernment stimulates demand for, andbecomes a first-time user of, innovativeproducts and technologies.3.4 Globally competitive capabilities —Plan and design major Crown procurements<strong>to</strong> provide opportunities for Canadiancompanies <strong>to</strong> become globally competitivesubcontrac<strong>to</strong>rs.3.5 Working collaboratively — Exploreavenues of collaboration with provincialand municipal governments regarding theuse of procurement <strong>to</strong> support innovationby Canadian suppliers and <strong>to</strong> fostergovernments’ adoption of innovativeproducts that will help reduce the cost andimprove the quality of public services.Public–Private Research CollaborationWe believe that public–private researchconsortia in <strong>Canada</strong> lack the scale needed <strong>to</strong>have significant impact on the development ofglobally competitive Canadian companies.Consequently, <strong>Canada</strong> needs a fundamentallynew approach <strong>to</strong> building such collaborations inareas of strategic importance and opportunityfor the economy. The existing institutes of theNRC are a unique asset in terms ofinfrastructure, talent and sec<strong>to</strong>ral and regionalcoverage. Consistent with the new directionbeing taken by NRC management, we believethat several of the institutes should be evolved<strong>to</strong> become a core national constellation of R&DE-11

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!